One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PeterS
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 ... 2660 next>>
Jul 23, 2016 17:34:32   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Noted and agreed in part, but you're wasting your time with Congress as Ron and Rand Paul have explained to some of us...

They are in on it...

Nothing will change until these entities are removed from offices and V****g will not do that.

Occupy Washington approaches armed & Heavy !


Well grab your gun and do something about it Sici! I thought you said you were going to do that during the convention?
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 17:29:11   #
Kevyn wrote:
While I know some of you feel that the newspapers of record in our nation are not trustworthy and instead rely on Crossburners Quarterly, Wing Nut Digest and Rush Limbaughs 3 hours of dope fueled h**e as information sources the fact remains that The Washington Post is a paper of record for our nation and has won countless awards for their even handed journalism and investigative reporting. Here is a link to their editorial boards opinion on Donald Trumps p**********l aspirations. Please take a few minutes to read the piece and comment on it thoughtfully.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-a-unique-threat-to-american-democracy/2016/07/22/a6d823cc-4f4f-11e6-aa14-e0c1087f7583_story.html?wpisrc=nl_az_most
While I know some of you feel that the newspapers ... (show quote)


"He is mounting a campaign of snarl and sneer, not substance."

Great sentence. Watching Donald's speech was as entertaining as listening to it: he would give you a profile where he sticks his chin up in a bit in sort-of a Hitchcock pose--this was his 'Hitchcock Donald;' then he would give you the dead on serious pose--this was 'serious Donald;' then he has the pose where he looks like he just ate a sour lemon--this is 'lemon face Donald' pose; then there is the pose where he makes an O with his mouth as he speaks, this is 'O face Donald' and one of his more funny IMHO.

I am sure there are more I just can't watch him long enough to know all that he has for the world. You have to wonder just how he became so wealthy as he has to spend hours daily just practicing one face after another...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 16:50:01   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Okay Boys and Girls; Can we get back to tthe subject at hand?
Correct me if I am wrong:

Melania didn't write the speech. That was admitted in advance. The speech was worked on for 5 weeks; it just contained her sentiments and perspective.
IMO - Melania meant those words. That is what counts. Words are words. The heart is the heart.
We have been over Michelle's quotes and back ground too many times to to go over again.


She didn't write the speech? So why did Melania say she did and does she not know what plagiarism is? I mean, after all, she clearly read Michelle's speech(s) and knew that the words and phrases contained in her speech were close enough that they could be considered the same; or are you trying to imply she lacks the mental capacity to understand what plagiarism is? Melania seemed a pretty sharp cookie to me; certainly sharp enough to know that what she was doing was wrong.

And I am sure Melania meant those words--Michelle certainly did when she wrote them--which is why one credits the REAL author to let people know you not only appreciate the words but the person who first said them--or did your teachers not teach you the importance of not stealing from others--clearly Melania's didn't...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 16:21:51   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
http://www.teaparty.org/l-times-suggests-military-c**p-president-trump-177339/


God, I know I missed things while on vacation--but when did Trump become president and why am I not finding out until now?
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 16:18:51   #
mwdegutis wrote:
Led by our fearless leader…



Well that's certainly more important then standing united around America's first black president. Now I see why you guys don't like him. I'll bet Trump never makes the same staging mistake. How bad would that look right! And that's what's really important--how thinks look, not how they really are...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 12:18:22   #
bmac32 wrote:
And you teach children, 'A church may not interfere in governments business'. It was written the other way but the left decided government is no wrong doer so let's enforce it when it fits are need. It was brought up because the Church of England was run by the government, no church has ever run this government. The government may not interfere in church business that is one the reasons church property is NOT taxed!

It would depend on what the churches business was whether government can interfere in it. As for Church's not being taxed--all non profits aren't taxed. When their business is to line the pockets of their 'leaders' every penny they make should be taxed--but sadly too many think they should skate by not paying a penny.
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 12:09:18   #
straightUp wrote:
What does factual have to do with bigotry? Here let me show you something... This is a quote from the dickbag himself...

"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're sending people that have lots of problems. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists." - Donald Trump.

1. Mexico doesn't "send" ANYONE. The immigrants are operating on their own free will.
2. He is making a reference to an entire group of people and he is implying that they are ALL rapists. That is not a fact, but it *IS* bigoted. He is implying that they all bring crime. That is NOT a fact either, but it *IS* bigoted.
3. He is implying that they have lots of problems. That *IS* a fact and it's also bigoted. It's a fact because it's problems like poverty and danger that brings them here in the first place, it's bigoted because his intention isn't to understand the problems but to encourage fear and loathing toward them.

We are the nation with a giant statue that says “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” That means people with problems. If we want to build a wall then we should take the Statue of Liberty down because all it represents now is a lie.
What does factual have to do with bigotry? Here le... (show quote)


Damn, you are on fire. Nicely done. I love reading your posts. Keep it up...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 12:06:34   #
straightUp wrote:
Wrong.

Banana Republic is a term that was first coined in the 1920s to describe the Latin American countries that fell under the control of pro-US dictatorships that forced the people to stop producing food for their own needs and to use all their land to produce bananas for export to the U.S. market, which in turn forced them to import staples from the U.S. at a much higher cost. That's the part you apparently didn't know about. Of course in many of these countries the people didn't stand for it and it led to efforts for land reform which were defeated by the dictatorships that were being supported by U.S. government, sometimes to the point of sending in the Marines. During the Cold War, the Soviets offered the people the only recourse they had against an oppressive U.S. policy. That's the part that probably caused you're misunderstanding.

just to be clear... banana republics are pro-US. The revolutions against them were pro-Soviet.

That's how drastic your misunderstanding is.
Wrong. br br Banana Republic is a term that was f... (show quote)


Nice explanation. Want to bet they still don' understand!
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 12:04:51   #
son of witless wrote:
Well, , , would I be a bigot if I said I will v**e for Mr. Trump because we are both White Males? Well , , , , would I? I am pretty damn sure I would be called a bigot. Now if you are some other persuasion other than White Male and you v**e for a candidate because that person is not a White Male then you will never be called a bigot.

Samuel L. Jackson, the famous actor, excuse me, the famous Black
Actor said that he v**ed for Barak Obama because he was Black.

Hillary openly uses her g****r as a campaign issue as if g****r is a qualification to be President. Those who only v**e for Hillary because they want a woman as President will never be called bigots.
Well, , , would I be a bigot if I said I will v**e... (show quote)

No, you are a bigot because of your beliefs not because of your actions. Actions are simply a reflection of your beliefs. If I believed only a white woman was qualified to be president then I would be bigoted. That isn't what I believe though nor is it a reason to v**e for Hillary Clinton.
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 11:54:12   #
America Only wrote:
Oh course..in your opinion Melania should be booted out for a mere speech...so now if THAT is so warranted,....you must be all for dropping an atomic bomb on Obama and the Clintons for THEIR crimes against the USA, right????? Or do you think just an ordinary firing squad for Hillary and the Obama's will be enough?


Oh, a firing squad would be more than sufficient. The point is that there was a time where the theft of someone else's work was taken more seriously, which of course, begs the question of why you are so concerned about Hillary when clearly you could care less if people have any intellectual honesty at all...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 01:37:37   #
DJRich wrote:
The usual liars, like the fools at fox, fat limbah, the trump organization and especially the i***t manafort, are busy whipping the egg off of their ugly faces, since a trump "speech writer" has admitted that she "cribbed" lines and passages from Michelle Obama's 2008 speech. During a phone conversation with millennial trump, she heard the millennial one gush over how great the Michelle speech was, and how she admired the content of the speech. That was all McIver needed to plagiarize key lines.

To her credit, McIver offered to resign for being a plagiarist, but true to form, trump refused to accept her resignation, showing once again his complete failure to make decisions, even when his wife is getting bashed, and the media continues to run with this story.

Of course, the usual OPP i***ts, who know absolutely nothing except what they get from the fools at fox, rightwingnut media and trumps paid liars, refuse to admit that trump was wrong.

Oh well, it is a god given right to be stupid and ignorant, and conservatards prove it daily.


http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/melania-trump-speech/2016/07/20/id/739632/
The usual liars, like the fools at fox, fat limbah... (show quote)


Since Melania knew the phrases were lifted from Michelle's speech then she willingly committed plagiary. That a speech writer put the words in the speech makes no difference--the words were there at Melania's request...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 01:30:07   #
Morgan wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/melania-trump-republican-convention-plagiarism-michelle-obama

Does Melania steal enough of the speech in part to no be accused of plagiarism? Maybe this is why the right gets accused for no original concepts, view for yourself ...and tell us what you think

Steal enough to be considered plagiarism? When you take the thoughts and words of someone else and use them as your own, without any form of accreditation to the author, you've committee plagiary. In high school plagiary will get you a zero and in College it will get you booted out. The real irony of this though is that Melania used, of all people, Michelle Obama to plagiarize. The right has demonize Michelle for 7 and a half years and Melania uses Michelle's words to sell Trump to the rest of the v**ers. If it wasn't so god damn funny I would say to strip Melania of her citizenship and boot her out but I am actually laughing so hard to ask for something so reasonable...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 01:10:51   #
whole2th wrote:
PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION fit the tactics and the agenda.

The US is Israel's b***h.


Trumps ego controls Trump and it always has.
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 01:03:31   #
PawneeCounty wrote:
I am just going to write in a name for President I cannot v**e for Trump or Clinton. Just look at what Trump has said things like, “I will surround myself with the best people.” Just where does he stand and how do we know he will keep with what he says?

We already know what Hillary Clinton will do she will keep the ACA, she will tax those evil corporations and those rich people even more, she will raise the minimum wage to fifteen dollars per hour and cause prices to go up and increase unemployment, she will put as many liberals in the Supreme Court as she can, she will open up the boarder so anyone who wants to can come in whether they are terrorist, or just poor old thieves who have to steal, rape, murder, kidnap, and rob for a living not to mention take jobs from legal Americans. So we know Clinton will continue to run the United Stated into a third world nation and grow government to the point it is out of control.

So why should I v**e for Trump when Hillary has so much to offer?

What has Trump offered to do if elected? The answer is dumb policies like securing the borders, promoting trade deals that are fair to both the USA and the foreign nations, appoint fair and conservative Supreme Court Justices, improve the Veteran Administration, give the military what they need to succeed in their efforts to defend the nation, cut taxes on corporations to promote job growth and economic development, reduce taxes on middle and lower class workers.

How does he think that if he appoints the best people to the cabinet and other offices, to offer advise, which he will listen to, and act accordingly will achieve results?

If you want to turn the United States into a third world nation with total government control then keep your stubbornness and write in or v**e third party and turn the nation over to the likes of Hillary Clinton. By golly that is what I am going to do you betcha that for sure. I mean who knows what a Trump Presidency will do.

Keep America in the gutter where we like it v**e for Hillary Clinton → 2016 but never Trump.
I am just going to write in a name for President I... (show quote)

Your're funny PC. I like the part where he is going to lower taxes on the middle and low income workers. If you ever listened to Rush Limbaugh you would know that these workers don't pay any taxes in the first place. Maybe you meant that Trump will cut payroll and state taxes--is that it? And if Trump can't even run his own convention what makes you think he is going to be able to run something as complected as a government? Oh, that's right, he said he is going to leave foreign and domestic policy to Pence but how do we know that Pence is the "best available?" In fact, since Trump hasn't been able to load his own campaign committee with the "best available" what make's you think what makes you think he can do the same with government...
Go to
Jul 23, 2016 00:46:30   #
oldroy wrote:
I don't know about this but the chances are very strong that they may try this. Of course, they need only to win to put our first dictator in office. Do they have enough control of the military for Obama to do anything like this? If he allows the e******n to take place I have to wonder if he can pull off something like this.


http://constitution.com/left-planning-military-c**p-trump-wins/


Of course we are. The purpose of the second amendment was so we could eliminate a free standing army but since conservatives don't feel secure unless we have the biggest and baddest available we might as well use it to show conservatives why the founders didn't want one in the first place!!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 ... 2660 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.