rumitoid wrote:
Sorry, I should look at what you have to say but the facts about Issa makes him as creepy and evil as Cheney.
bull s**t , when you cant have your way attack the the person .now i want the republicans to demand all subversives be removed from congress and the white house then we will have progress.
son of witless wrote:
Democrats are making an issue of Congressman Issa cutting off the mike of Congressman Cummings. Does anyone believe that Cummings merely wished to ask a question? I saw the video clip and it was clear that Congressman Cummings was about to do more than ask a question.
I have not seen every minute of every hearing the committee has convened, but what I have seen from Cummings is his opposition to the committee moving forward on getting to the bottom of the Obama IRS scandal.
cummings iq is about 65 which is high for them.
3jack wrote:
There's always someone willing to embellish a statement to make things look worse than they actually are. The aid to Ukraine is 1 billion. The IMF does not tax your money. The proposed Myra is nothing more than a different version of the IRA (INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNT). You currently pay taxes when you withdraw funds from your IRA, so what's the difference?
if you check youll find out you dont pay taxes on iras you pay up front.
Kevyn wrote:
You need to watch late night TV the infomercials will tell you how to invest in gold. If you cash in your IRA, bank accounts and retirement savings and buy guns, ammo, gold, whiskey and lots of canned goods you will be one of the few ready for the coming apocalypse!
yes she will need the weapons to fight off dumasses like you.
Patty wrote:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-12/imf-wants-you-pay-71-income-tax
They are going to take it out of our pocket one way or the other.
Lets see, IMF takes 71% and Obama's MyRA takes 15%. The state, county and local takes 10% (if your lucky). Arent they nice to leave us with 4% of our own money.
just where are they getting the 15 bil.to give away?they dont have enough money to buy a roll of toilet paper.
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
Who is this "Fool" Vaclav Klaus?
oh just another bruce kennedy
banjojack wrote:
I'm still on Democrats. The Republican pond scum will have to wait their turn. I will say that I don't see why Nixon needed 6 pallbearers at his funeral, there are only 2 handles on a trash can.
just remember every thing that nixon was accused of obama has done only nixon had the balls to resign.obama is a cancer on this country and will have to be carried out of office.
Mr Shako wrote:
"Both parties have dinos that need to go...."
Well...at least John "jack-booted thugs" Dingell has decided to call it quits. Oh, wait...his old lady is going to run for his seat!
Man...you can't beat that s**t with an electric mixmaster!
how old it she,i would guess 13
skott wrote:
I'm sure the Hatfields and McCoys would agree.
thats the most stupid remark of the day.
[quote=Tasine]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, I did know these went back some years, and "to protect the innocent?", I almost didn't post it. Then I decided everyone [b]needs[\b] to see this clip. When people move their lips and it looks like they are saying what the words being formed look like, one should pay attention. I don't think the people in the organization are about what the "conspiracy nuts" think it is about, but one cannot deny that IF such plans are serious, in good hands they could be good, but in bad hands, things could not be more disastrous. That's how things have escalated so much today - bad people are taking the US, using its fine qualities against us, and destroying the country we love. IOW, playing right into One World Planning. One World Plans could never reach fruition as long as conservatives have any voice. They MUST shut us up, and they are well on their way to doing just that.[/quote]
they dont have an exporation date,they are still with us.
no propaganda please wrote:
Yes, he finally admitted that he lived with his uncle Frank. We still don't know if Frank was his father, or sexual partner, or both. We do however that Frank was his mentor and a member of the American C*******t Party, and taught him the Saul Alinsky way of being a community organizer. That is sufficient to cause me to never v**e for him for any job more important that dog catcher.
there was two franks the first frank is q***r frank and he is dead.he was very close to our queen .
MrEd wrote:
While it is true that a lot of this is "OLD" and seems like nothing to talk about, it is none the less true. They couldn't get it all up and running back then and it really wasn't a big problem back them. The problem comes in now that they can get away with a lot of this stuff, or they think they can, so they are starting to implement this stuff. Granted it is old, but the idea's behind it are even older. This has always been the dream of the "One World Order" crowd and as soon as they can implement all of it they will. Obama is only to happy to try.
While it is true that a lot of this is "OLD&q... (
show quote)
their laws and nobody has repealed them.
SchoonerPete wrote:
You just didn't pay attention.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
lpnmajor wrote:
Your argument would only hold water if everyone was capable of and committed to using reason as a first resort. Those of us ARE capable of reason, know that premise to be false. This is neither a "left" or "right" question, regardless of some sentiments. "Guns for everyone!" would be a "l*****t" concept, "guns for the privileged few" would be a "rightist" concept. Obviously the "best thing to do" is somewhere in the middle - just like everything else should be.
Your argument would only hold water if everyone wa... (
show quote)
that is an ignorant statement the left wants no guns in the hand of anyone but them selves that way they will truley be our masters.
and im still wating for an answer.