I did some background research and this is what I found. Two news sources disproved the story, Three had proof and two were suspicious of Omar because she didn't respond for quite some time. There are twice as many for as against. I wasn't surprised that NO MSM outlet even mentioned the story, rumor, wh**ever you want to call it. She is their rock star right now.
This one thing is proven though; there is mo divorce on record for the UK man she legally married. She said they divorced per their faith. That might be OK with Alla, but not for the American legal system. In effect, she is legally married to one man and living with another. Whether or not he is her brother, that's pretty far out there. I mean look at all the hoopla raised about Trump having sex with a s**t 10 years ago while this senator is married to one man while living with and having children with another man. No big deal for Hollywooders or maybe some others, but it's a pretty big deal for the US Congress. PLUS, she is a r****t. Now, that's all we heard there for a while about Trump, but her r****m is no rumor. AND she refuses to apologize for it. Look at all the people who have went down the tubes over r****m since Trumps e******n, yet she suffers nothing for it.
I will give you this; it's possible and "maybe" likely that the man she is living with is NOT her husband, but enough people are convinced of it that I have to say I'm divided about it.
One source said there was no marriage certificate for her and the UK man, but another source says there is. She says that she and the UK man got a license but never used it. The she says she IS married but is working on a divorce. How many versions of the facts are we going to find here?
I'll say this, if she IS married, she should get a legal divorce and then marry the man she is living with to be respectable in the eyes of the nation.
While she may NOT be married to her brother, there is certainly enough reasonable doubt amid all the versions she herself has given, that I am comfortable in repeating the story. Prove me wrong and I'll retract my statements and apologize to you.

After I posted this, I saw that she indeed WAS married legally and has divorced and married the man she is living with. Neither was her brother, which I said was possible and maybe likely, but the rest of my statements were true it seems. I said I was divided on the brother thing, and the sources I used were wrong, making me wrong and I retract that part of my statements.
It was a 3 part story and I was right on 2 parts of it, but if you feel that I owe you the apology I promised, just let me know and I'll do as I said.

To my knowledge Trump's campaign was surveilled by the past administration...
I believe that Trump's original tweet about this used quotation marks around the term 'tapped'...
Not a conspiracy theory.. Although people often mix up the terminology...

Do you believe that the past Administration surveilled Teump and his campaign?

And no... I can't see why you would lash out...
Maximus has been nothing but civil to you (on this thread at least) and has offered his opinion and understanding of the facts...
I watch only Fox and MSNBC (both rarely) But I have heard of these incidents... Articles I usually end up doing more research, But the tapping of Trump tower was not one of the topics that evoked my interest...

Here's the quandary...I don't believe that the Obama ordered wire tap was a legitimate investigation because Obama denied it, AND the wire tap was illegal. Never...ever...has it come to light that a sitting president ordered an illegal wire tap on a p**********l candidate or had loyal followers be a plant in the president elects cabinet.
Also I'm not alt right, BTW. You believe that you seek the right sources and what you find is correct, and I feel the same way. I DO watch Lester Holt, IMO is as crooked as a dogs hind leg, for my liberal views, and sometimes I can watch a little of CNN, but not for long as they ARE the h**e wagon.
The question is who says that your "facts" are correct and mine are not, and vice versa, who says that my "facts" are right and yours are wrong. We each have to believe what we trust in our hearts is true.

I did some background research and this is what I found. Two news sources disproved the story, Three had proof and two were suspicious of Omar because she didn't respond for quite some time. There are twice as many for as against. I wasn't surprised that NO MSM outlet even mentioned the story, rumor, wh**ever you want to call it. She is their rock star right now.
This one thing is proven though; there is mo divorce on record for the UK man she legally married. She said they divorced per their faith. That might be OK with Alla, but not for the American legal system. In effect, she is legally married to one man and living with another. Whether or not he is her brother, that's pretty far out there. I mean look at all the hoopla raised about Trump having sex with a s**t 10 years ago while this senator is married to one man while living with and having children with another man. No big deal for Hollywooders or maybe some others, but it's a pretty big deal for the US Congress. PLUS, she is a r****t. Now, that's all we heard there for a while about Trump, but her r****m is no rumor. AND she refuses to apologize for it. Look at all the people who have went down the tubes over r****m since Trumps e******n, yet she suffers nothing for it.
I will give you this; it's possible and "maybe" likely that the man she is living with is NOT her husband, but enough people are convinced of it that I have to say I'm divided about it.
One source said there was no marriage certificate for her and the UK man, but another source says there is. She says that she and the UK man got a license but never used it. The she says she IS married but is working on a divorce. How many versions of the facts are we going to find here?
I'll say this, if she IS married, she should get a legal divorce and then marry the man she is living with to be respectable in the eyes of the nation.
While she may NOT be married to her brother, there is certainly enough reasonable doubt amid all the versions she herself has given, that I am comfortable in repeating the story. Prove me wrong and I'll retract my statements and apologize to you.

After I posted this, I saw that she indeed WAS married legally and has divorced and married the man she is living with. Neither was her brother, which I said was possible and maybe likely, but the rest of my statements were true it seems. I said I was divided on the brother thing, and the sources I used were wrong, making me wrong and I retract that part of my statements.
It was a 3 part story and I was right on 2 parts of it, but if you feel that I owe you the apology I promised, just let me know and I'll do as I said.

Ohhh...I don't know about government sources being factual where Trump is concerned. It's pretty far alt left for a sitting president to order an illegal wire tap on a p**********l candidate, and for the CIA and FBI to take part in an investigation to take down the president elect, for a judge to issue a FISA on an unproven document obtained from a foreign agent from another foreign (Russian) agent, was paid for by the Democratic party. You won't find any of this on those particular government sources. I got this information from various sources and I trust that it is true. That being said, can ANYONE prove that I'm wrong? Show me your proof. If I'm wrong, I will retract my statements and apologize for spreading false facts.

Facts are arbitrary. I have posted some facts that I was sure were correct and true, only to be called out on them, and then further research proved me to be wrong. I retracted my false "facts". If I'm wrong, I WANT to be called out because I want only the t***h. All lefties tell the tale about Trump not trusting the CIA and the FBI. When you just throw it out there, it sounds bad. The thing they fail to mention is that BOTH agencies were actively involved in spying by electronics, by infiltrating Trump's cabinet, all on orders and loyalty to a past president from the opposing party. That changes things. Trump was saying that he could trust Putin more than his own intelligence agencies, because they were working against him. Both statements are true, but the second of these 2 statements turn #1 from a fools jibber, to a man stating that he is well aware of sabotage going on in his shadow by the very agents who are expected to back him without political influence, and that, no, he doesn't trust them. Now, the l*****ts,concerning this thread, are saying that THEY have the true facts. When you say only that Trump said he trusted Putin but not his intelligence agencies, you are telling only half of the story. Maybe not even half because a past president started it, almost all high ranking officials in the CIA, FBI, and DOJ were involved in it, and add to that, the DNC hired a foreign agent to get a dossier from another foreign agent, namely a Russian. They paid for this false document. A judge granted a FISA even though none of the statements were vetted. Even individual agents were involved in the plot.
I didn't say all this to try to insult ANYBODY on either side of the aisle, but IMHO, these actions were not only illegal, they were treasonous!
Now, there are lots of thing to argue ( or debate) concerning Trump, but this one situation is more than enough to establish a pattern. I believe that there are facts that are reliable to back up my statements. I won't post them because we have all read about it. What I ask the left is this...can any of you prove that I am wrong? If I see your proof, I will retract my statements. If you can't prove me wrong, will you admit it?

And for all that "center" media and aloof points of view, your every utterance seems to take the perspective of the far left.

There was another commenter who, like you, "camouf**ged" his leftism with an almost identical brand of pontification, but the homogeneous context of his arguments rendered his persona utterly t***sparent very quickly.

Don't worry, I have an uncle who is a gated community "progressive," and I've heard it all from him. Same far left perspective delivered in disguise as "impartial, reasonable views."

Wh**ever floats your boat, I guess.

One thing I like about my fellow conservatives is that we tend to be more plain spoken and less surreptitious about who we are.