One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Money Magazine explains Obamacare
Page <<first <prev 8 of 11 next> last>>
Sep 27, 2013 10:42:49   #
Artemis
 
American wrote:
I put my trust in my saviour Jesus Christ. I pray every day that he will give Ted Cruz and all the others the strength to stand their ground. People don't understand that instead of waiting two or three hours to see a doctor, it will be two or three days!!! How are they going to feel when no one can see their sick child for two days!


Hypothetical ...fear based has no merit as yet. Give it a chance and than base it on facts.

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 10:42:57   #
vernon
 
Billhuggins wrote:
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT 1977, TITLE 7, 91 stat 1147. Google it! Clinton was not president in 1977.


but clinton supercharged it

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 10:44:08   #
Artemis
 
AnnMarie wrote:
http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/01/pf/obamacare-insurance.moneymag/3.html?iid=EL

Seems to be a lot of misunderstanding of Obamacare on this site, and I found this article, by Money Magazine (neutral source, we would all agree) that explains Obamacare


Thank you Ann Marie, this will be a help for many :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2013 10:45:09   #
vernon
 
maelstrom wrote:
Hypothetical ...fear based has no merit as yet. Give it a chance and than base it on facts.


anyone who dosent distrust government doesnt know history and how corrupt politicans can be.

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 10:48:14   #
VladimirPee
 
The CNN MONEY article conveniently ignores the negative aspects of Obamacare. Its a propaganda piece at best.

maelstrom wrote:
Thank you Ann Marie, this will be a help for many :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 10:51:18   #
Comment Loc: California
 
AnnMarie wrote:
I think most people (even the people who were most against it) came to like Medicare. I think the same thing will happen to Obamacare. I don't see how that opinion makes me a Marxist. We DO have majority rule. The majority of people chose Obama. The majority of people (1 million more votes) chose Democratic congresspeople, but the republicans gerrymandered the districts. If we DID HAVE majority rule, we would not have a republican congress.

Be careful what you wish for.


AM : your opinion has foster a nanny state. In a nanny state people don't move forward on their own. You, liberals don't understand that. People don't save, don't buy insurance; they spend every dollar thay make on today. Frack! tomorrow. It's the people's fault. Can't you see that? I don't and couldn't live on SS alone because I looked into the future and saw my future. I worked and I saved. I didn't take vacations. I didn't buy new cars. I did it myself with no female help.

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:01:18   #
Artemis
 
DennisDee wrote:
Democrats didn't gerrymander districts? Are you kidding? They created Black Congressional majority districts for decades. Check this one out. Carved out to increase the black vote.


Read carefully this is her direct quote from AM post "but the
republicans gerrymandered the districts." I am from NC which has been in the news a lot lately because we are democratic majority based per vote state, but because of gerrymandering /redistricting from the republican majority rule legislature we are in complete control under the GOP and have a new REP. Governor even though the majority of the votes were for the democratic constituent.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2013 11:08:11   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Confused wrote:
Just for the record let's break down that asinine 47 % comment from the corporate raider / candidate Romney . 50 % of them are drawing S.S. , which has been taxed in the year it was earned . Another 25 % use the tax codes to avoid paying anything . ( Romney paid NO income tax in 2008 & 2009 ) . That leaves about 25 % which includes students with summer jobs and low income earners ( like Wal Mart employees who we subsidize directly with SNAP and other programs already ) Why in the world should we subsidize Wal Mart's labor costs ?
Next class we will cover corporate welfare ( about 10 times the actual amount as the " welfare " you spoke of ) and tax loopholes ( 2.8 trillion a year ) .
Just for the record let's break down that asinine ... (show quote)


you are inconsistent you throw in the s/s recipients that have already paid tax on what they receive but when it comes to Romney who has already paid tax on his investments you want him to pay again when he spends the interest form those investments

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:09:10   #
VladimirPee
 
But the GOP won the Governorship in NC with a clear majority over 20%

Popular vote
2,447,988 to 1,931,750



maelstrom wrote:
Read carefully this is her direct quote from AM post "but the
republicans gerrymandered the districts." I am from NC which has been in the news a lot lately because we are democratic majority based per vote state, but because of gerrymandering /redistricting from the republican majority rule legislature we are in complete control under the GOP and have a new REP. Governor even though the majority of the votes were for the democratic constituent.

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:11:40   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
1965 I believe.



alex wrote:
it says the medicare part is 1.45% while s/s is 6.2% I was aware of the s/s part what year did the medicare withholding start does anybody know?

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:14:18   #
Artemis
 
vernon wrote:
anyone who dosent distrust government doesnt know history and how corrupt politicans can be.


That's not what I'm saying.There is a balance of listening,going cautiously with doubt, but not total distrust, along with some trust. If you don't have a certain amount of trust for your own country, than why be here. Being a Patriot is having faith not only the USA but also its governing system.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2013 11:47:57   #
vernon
 
maelstrom wrote:
Read carefully this is her direct quote from AM post "but the
republicans gerrymandered the districts." I am from NC which has been in the news a lot lately because we are democratic majority based per vote state, but because of gerrymandering /redistricting from the republican majority rule legislature we are in complete control under the GOP and have a new REP. Governor even though the majority of the votes were for the democratic constituent.


the gov vote is state wide , if he had the votes he would have won.this is just more ignorant lies by demorats

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:50:13   #
vernon
 
maelstrom wrote:
That's not what I'm saying.There is a balance of listening,going cautiously with doubt, but not total distrust, along with some trust. If you don't have a certain amount of trust for your own country, than why be here. Being a Patriot is having faith not only the USA but also its governing system.


i dam sure distrust until i know for sure

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:52:20   #
VladimirPee
 
Vernon they just make shit up instead of researching the facts.


vernon wrote:
the gov vote is state wide , if he had the votes he would have won.this is just more ignorant lies by demorats

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 11:56:23   #
vernon
 
Billhuggins wrote:
AM : your opinion has foster a nanny state. In a nanny state people don't move forward on their own. You, liberals don't understand that. People don't save, don't buy insurance; they spend every dollar thay make on today. Frack! tomorrow. It's the people's fault. Can't you see that? I don't and couldn't live on SS alone because I looked into the future and saw my future. I worked and I saved. I didn't take vacations. I didn't buy new cars. I did it myself with no female help.


ann marie you are wrong the states are divided into cong districts and there is no way the rep. didnt win a huge majority

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.