Why is Obama "A Socialist And A Muslim"?
Aug 25, 2013 12:51:21 #
You're 110% right! That's why I get all of my news here, at onepoliticalplaza.com. The Truth and nothing but the Truth! Well OK, quite a bit of circular reasoning, liberal bashing (fucking commies!) tinfoil hat ranting and self-pity, but hey, we're all (white people) getting pretty damned sick of being oppressed in this country. Am I right? I said, AM I RIGHT?!
Squatty Baudy wrote:
~~~~~~ br Don't kid yourself - there ARE stupid Am... (show quote)
Aug 25, 2013 12:54:23 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
You are very naïve, but I admire your tenaciousness. It must be difficult to breath with your head so far up your fanny. I also see you are enamored with pigs, wonder why? Perhaps that is a personal problem.
Regardless, news channels, newspapers, and yes even the internet get their revenue from some place. Often you will see a dramatic shift in how news is reported based on the political affiliations of the owner. Notice the sudden shift in Fox News after it was sold.
Because you and those who share similar beliefs as yourself like to use Wikipedia, here is a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias also see the study presented by Washington University and published in Behavorial Research Methods. http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/22166.aspx
.
Regardless, news channels, newspapers, and yes even the internet get their revenue from some place. Often you will see a dramatic shift in how news is reported based on the political affiliations of the owner. Notice the sudden shift in Fox News after it was sold.
Because you and those who share similar beliefs as yourself like to use Wikipedia, here is a link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias also see the study presented by Washington University and published in Behavorial Research Methods. http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/22166.aspx
.
AnnMarie wrote:
Soros does not own media matters either. Media Matters, and Politifact are news organizations that are apolitical, and simply get the facts out. They call BS on either party, or "news" organization that reports a WHOPPER, like Fox did. OK, Old Gringo, I see that facts do not change your opinion, I am in teaching a pig to sing mode here, so I will sign off.
Aug 25, 2013 13:20:30 #
No need to argue or bring light into to the mosquito brain mentality on this forum. Most of this web sites used in reference are own either by Ultra conservative Nazis and according to them own by extreme Liberals. This leaves all in the dark, so stop quoting or sending us to read in the posted web sites; beacuse everything in those web sites are LIES and distortion of the truth.
ginnyt wrote:
You are right in saying that Soros does not have t... (show quote)
Aug 25, 2013 13:36:43 #
Let's see you prove your comment. Shoot off your mouth and to hell with facts and reality. The right has been the ones eager to do away with the Constitution as it stands. They have said so several times.
Old_Gringo wrote:
You must be aware of his response. The Prog Obamacrats can't live with the Constitution as written They want to rewrite it or dissolve it altogether. No satisfying them, they don't even want "compromise" on this issue.
Aug 25, 2013 13:43:34 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
I appreciate your candor. I try to get to the heart of situations and the only other sources than the news media is going directly to those involved. That is impracticable. I am sorry that you do not trust the sites I referenced and doubt my sincerity. In which case, I ask you not to read my comments as I do not have any intention of offending you nor do I have intention of showing just one source for my conclusions. Therefore, if you feel impassioned about retaining your beliefs, regardless of what they are, it is recommended that stay clear of people who do their research and try to present with sources and their rationale for comments.
I have respect for many who post on this forum. I have checked out their sources and done my own research on the subjects. Many that post are correct in their assumptions and I can find no fault in their logic. Yes, there are many who are clueless, some who take everything as a personal affront, and some who have only 4 or 5 phrases in their vocabulary. But, when you weed the ones out who are lackluster in their research skills and are illogical, you will find the gifted people. Those men and women deserve respect.
I have respect for many who post on this forum. I have checked out their sources and done my own research on the subjects. Many that post are correct in their assumptions and I can find no fault in their logic. Yes, there are many who are clueless, some who take everything as a personal affront, and some who have only 4 or 5 phrases in their vocabulary. But, when you weed the ones out who are lackluster in their research skills and are illogical, you will find the gifted people. Those men and women deserve respect.
Vic Freits wrote:
No need to argue or bring light into to the mosquito brain mentality on this forum. Most of this web sites used in reference are own either by Ultra conservative Nazis and according to them own by extreme Liberals. This leaves all in the dark, so stop quoting or sending us to read in the posted web sites; beacuse everything in those web sites are LIES and distortion of the truth.
Aug 25, 2013 13:48:42 #
Vic Freits wrote:
No need to argue or bring light into to the mosquito brain mentality on this forum. Most of this web sites used in reference are own either by Ultra conservative Nazis and according to them own by extreme Liberals. This leaves all in the dark, so stop quoting or sending us to read in the posted web sites; beacuse everything in those web sites are LIES and distortion of the truth.
Conservatives can't be Nazi's. That is reserved for Socialists.
Aug 25, 2013 13:54:02 #
Don Overton wrote:
Let's see you prove your comment. Shoot off your mouth and to hell with facts and reality. The right has been the ones eager to do away with the Constitution as it stands. They have said so several times.
The Conservatives are for strict Constitutional adherence. It is the Progs, meaning those of your persuasion, that want to disassemble it to their liking.
Aug 25, 2013 13:54:24 #
Don Overton wrote:
Let's see you prove your comment. Shoot off your mouth and to hell with facts and reality. The right has been the ones eager to do away with the Constitution as it stands. They have said so several times.
The Conservatives are for strict Constitutional adherence. It is the Progs, meaning those of your persuasion, that want to disassemble and change it to their liking.
Aug 25, 2013 18:34:26 #
Ginnyt, The book I read said that Sadam used the Earthquake aid to Syria to move the WMDs, If we could match the dates with the dates that the UN tried to enter Iraq we could confirm the story! There! that should give the liberals an opening to re-inforce their lies on the WMDs!
Aug 25, 2013 18:47:37 #
Don Overton wrote:
Let's see you prove your comment. Shoot off your mouth and to hell with facts and reality. The right has been the ones eager to do away with the Constitution as it stands. They have said so several times.
Don, You have everything reversed, the leftists have said many times "the constitution was written by old white men" "it needs to be updated" remember that one? Your idol Klinton!, And the Constitution needs to be replaced by the "Right of the People" (one of the origional Communist ones) Remember who said that one?? Hillary Klinton! But I'm sure THEY are conservatives ????? And the best one......The United States Constitution is pure colonialism! And has to be destroyed! by a elusive guy named Barry Soetero! Of course I wouldn't know who he is........ DO YOU?
Aug 25, 2013 19:42:54 #
AnnMarie
Loc: Madison, Wi
Old_Gringo wrote:
Your 'facts' are skewered. Soros bankrolled both your 'news outlets, in addition to many other left wing organizations, another of which is Huffy Post. Surely you jest when stating said publications are apolitical. Next you will be telling us you are apolitical. I hope you enjoy your singing lessons and are successful in learning how to sing.
Soros has nothing to do with Media Matters or Politifact. Sorry. Do you know who bankrolls (owns, actually) fox news?
Aug 25, 2013 19:52:45 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
I do not know if all the WMDs were moved after the earthquake, but I believe that the most probable date of movement would have been in June 2002 when Iraq sent 20 planeloads of assistance after the damn burst. That happened on 9 June 2002. The link below gives the timeline for UN activity and the progression of events dealing with Iraq.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4996218
The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force, General George Sada says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed. This was in 2006, can't recall the exact date, but he wrote a book "Saddam's Secrets," which I found interesting.
Anyway, Syria said today that they would allow UN inspectors in to search for WMDs. Of course it is late in the game, especially if they used them in the attack last week. And, they have had time to clean up and move any that remain. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_SYRIA?SITE=FLMYR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Also see: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/25/syria-chemical-weapons/2696649/
In a report
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4996218
The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force, General George Sada says Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed. This was in 2006, can't recall the exact date, but he wrote a book "Saddam's Secrets," which I found interesting.
Anyway, Syria said today that they would allow UN inspectors in to search for WMDs. Of course it is late in the game, especially if they used them in the attack last week. And, they have had time to clean up and move any that remain. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_SYRIA?SITE=FLMYR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Also see: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/25/syria-chemical-weapons/2696649/
In a report
astrolite wrote:
Ginnyt, The book I read said that Sadam used the Earthquake aid to Syria to move the WMDs, If we could match the dates with the dates that the UN tried to enter Iraq we could confirm the story! There! that should give the liberals an opening to re-inforce their lies on the WMDs!
Aug 25, 2013 20:07:20 #
AnnMarie wrote:
Soros has nothing to do with Media Matters or Politifact. Sorry. Do you know who bankrolls (owns, actually) fox news?
Better go back and check your 'facts'. Soros did indeed bankroll Media Matters, I'm not sure about Poitifact but it wouldn't surprise me if he bankrolled it also. There are a plethora of others he bankrolled, including Huffy Post. Ignorance on your part doesn't cut it here. Oh, and Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdock.
Aug 25, 2013 20:09:39 #
Old_Gringo wrote:
Conservatives can't be Nazi's. That is reserved for Socialists.
The fact that the Nazi party had socialist in its name does not mean it was a socialist movement. The policies of Hitler are condisidered a fanatical example of Right Wing policies. Fascism is politically deemed Far Right, while dictatorships are simply an authoritarian takeover using any excuse or facade of leaning: power is without leaning, purely utilitarian.
Aug 25, 2013 20:15:40 #
Old_Gringo wrote:
Better go back and check your 'facts'. Soros did indeed bankroll Media Matters, I'm not sure about Poitifact but it wouldn't surprise me if he bankrolled it also. There are a plethora of others he bankrolled, including Huffy Post. Ignorance on your part doesn't cut it here. Oh, and Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdock.
Old gringo, facts to the contrary, why promote something you cannot prove and merely rely on ideofactoids for your "facts." Distrusting or disputing everything that does not perfectly aligned with what your conservative friends swear is true, which by repeating has become reality, weakens credibility. Evidence, or it is just plain silly. Ah, but the evidence is missing because the NWO has agents everywhere working with great vigilance and tirelessly to suppress or alter "facts." Again, what proof many point to is actually the lack of evidence to support their claim: "See how good this pinko machine is."
P.S. "Ideofactoids" is my recent invention; look for it becoming quite popular; of course this is not exclusive to the right but all who cannot find their way to be either earnest in their search for truth or objective in their view, persuaded by lean or emotion.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.