rumitoid wrote:
I can see a difference in the terms that has nothing to do with politics, but see no need to quibble as they did. "Evacuation" suggests an imminent or engaged threat, such as with being in the direct path of a tornado or a river about to flood. "Removal" seems to downsize what was happening, making it just precautionary without a direct threat. They're gone, is the point, for safety concerns.
Here we go again having to explain to rumitoid that evacuation could be interpreted as retreat. Again showing weakness on the part of America. I assume as a liberal you have no problem with retreating but I on the other hand do. Had Bill Clinton not retreated so many times during his tenure I personally do not believe we would have had 9/11. Now do you understand the politics!!! :evil: