Could be. They already have no problem with killing the unborn for convenience sake.
JFlorio wrote:
Could be. They already have no problem with killing the unborn for convenience sake.
I knew baby Trudeau loved the CCP, I didn't quite get that he wanted to emulate their disregard for human life and dignity. 😠
There is no good argument for a "living wage guaranteed income".
Do you think you have one?
Where and why did the pandemic bring world Chaos??
Is this possible, it’s not something I would readily dismiss that much I can say. Follows along the same guidelines of that “supposed conspiracy theory” of the one world order which Trudeau is a part of… The little dictator should be very careful.
American Vet wrote:
There is no good argument for a "living wage guaranteed income".
Do you think you have one?
In 2018 Colorado passed a right to die statute (Colorado End-of-Life Options Act ) voted on by the people that gives the person terminally ill the right to assist themselves with a “dignified death” versus the pain and agony they may experience until the end. Of course it requires two certifications from Physicians that the person is terminal and will not recover… That achieved they can be put in a hospice center setting and administer drugs until the person passes.
Debating the issue was quite intense some viewing it as inhumane as well as religious beliefs the creator being the only one able to decide when it is your time… The other side of the spectrum gbelieve it or not was based on putting down an animal that is sick and suffering and that human beings should have the same consideration afforded to them. Ultimately it went to the ballot and was voted on with the majority which was surprising approving the bill..
American Vet wrote:
There is no good argument for a "living wage guaranteed income".
Do you think you have one?
People who advocate for this are just uneducated useful idiots. Want everyone to have a guaranteed income? Expect incomes to decrease. None of the idiots on the left can even define what a living wage is.
American Vet wrote:
There is no good argument for a "living wage guaranteed income".
Do you think you have one?
Tucker trashed Ontario because these women did not have enough to live on and you are trashing the idea of giving them enough to live on.
RascalRiley wrote:
Tucker trashed Ontario because these women did not have enough to live on and you are trashing the idea of giving them enough to live on.
"Give" being the operative word.
Change that to "earn".....
It's not...there, you feel better?
American Vet wrote:
"Give" being the operative word.
Change that to "earn".....
Did you read the article? These were not people who could “earn”.
RascalRiley wrote:
Tucker trashed Ontario because these women did not have enough to live on and you are trashing the idea of giving them enough to live on.
Welfare payments would get her by. Guaranteed income offers no incentive to better herself. And if she was a senior, did she not have her husband's survivor benefits? Or her own from her working life for that matter? Or does Canada not have a Social Security system?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.