PeterS wrote:
And what is there to acknowledge? Anecdotal "evidence" is not evidenced JW. Trump's lawyers tried using it over 60 times and every time, whether a liberal or conservative judge, threw the cases out. File this with all the rest of the vomit you've committed to text. If you find a judge who will hear it then let us know. Until then, it's just more anecdotal evidence and nothing more...
There is a serious legal difference between throwing a case out and refusing to hear it. Not a single case has been thrown out and 2/3 of those actually heard were decided for Trump/Trump side.