One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
More voter fraud uncovered in Pennsylvania The Local Conservative, April7
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 7, 2021 21:38:20   #
Iliamna1
 
Liberals fuming after lawsuit forces them to remove 21K dead people from voter rolls

Pennsylvania has deleted over 20,000 voters from its registration rolls because of their status of no longer being alive.

That's right - the state of Pennsylvania had tens of thousands of dead people still registered to vote. And the only reason they're being removed is because of a lawsuit.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation sued the state back in November, claiming that about 21,000 dead individuals were still registered to vote in the 2020 presidential election. It turns out they were right.

"This marks an important victory for the integrity of elections in Pennsylvania," PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said.

The numbers were so bad that the state decided to settle the case outside of court. Part of the agreement includes Pennsylvania officials cross-referencing the state voter registration roll to look for any irregularities while purging dead voters from the list.

It makes you wonder what else has gone unnoticed in other states.

It makes me wonder how many of them voted in this last election and how many dead voters voted in the other states. HMMMMM ? ? ?

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 22:59:06   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
Liberals fuming after lawsuit forces them to remove 21K dead people from voter rolls

Pennsylvania has deleted over 20,000 voters from its registration rolls because of their status of no longer being alive.

That's right - the state of Pennsylvania had tens of thousands of dead people still registered to vote. And the only reason they're being removed is because of a lawsuit.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation sued the state back in November, claiming that about 21,000 dead individuals were still registered to vote in the 2020 presidential election. It turns out they were right.

"This marks an important victory for the integrity of elections in Pennsylvania," PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said.

The numbers were so bad that the state decided to settle the case outside of court. Part of the agreement includes Pennsylvania officials cross-referencing the state voter registration roll to look for any irregularities while purging dead voters from the list.

It makes you wonder what else has gone unnoticed in other states.

It makes me wonder how many of them voted in this last election and how many dead voters voted in the other states. HMMMMM ? ? ?
Liberals fuming after lawsuit forces them to remov... (show quote)


Gee whiz. Any clues at to which party they voted for?

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 23:12:07   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Gee whiz. Any clues at to which party they voted for?



Reply
 
 
Apr 7, 2021 23:21:32   #
Iliamna1
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Gee whiz. Any clues at to which party they voted for?


I haven't a clue. Would anyone care to give me odds on this?

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 23:22:22   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
Liberals fuming after lawsuit forces them to remove 21K dead people from voter rolls

Pennsylvania has deleted over 20,000 voters from its registration rolls because of their status of no longer being alive.

That's right - the state of Pennsylvania had tens of thousands of dead people still registered to vote. And the only reason they're being removed is because of a lawsuit.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation sued the state back in November, claiming that about 21,000 dead individuals were still registered to vote in the 2020 presidential election. It turns out they were right.

"This marks an important victory for the integrity of elections in Pennsylvania," PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said.

The numbers were so bad that the state decided to settle the case outside of court. Part of the agreement includes Pennsylvania officials cross-referencing the state voter registration roll to look for any irregularities while purging dead voters from the list.

It makes you wonder what else has gone unnoticed in other states.

It makes me wonder how many of them voted in this last election and how many dead voters voted in the other states. HMMMMM ? ? ?
Liberals fuming after lawsuit forces them to remov... (show quote)


Oh please !



Reply
Apr 7, 2021 23:28:23   #
jdw57 Loc: Almost Heaven
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
I haven't a clue. Would anyone care to give me odds on this?


All dead people vote democrat, just check the death certificates for party affiliation.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 07:18:42   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Oh please !


You don't find it amusing to watch the lemmings drop into a chasm of illogical 'thinking'?

1) the title says voter fraud uncovered, yet mentions nothing about any voting or fraud
2) the respondents assume any of the dead folks still on the rolls, actually 'voted'
3) they also assume that none of the 'dead voters' were Republican
4) the credulous peanut gallery just assumes, without any research, or even a link, that something untoward happened.

No wonder Donald Trump chose to run as a Republican...he knew they would swallow anything he told them, and do so willingly. They deserve each other: he lies as easily as he breathes and they want to be lied to....beats thinking for themselves.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2021 08:25:11   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
jdw57 wrote:
All dead people vote democrat, just check the death certificates for party affiliation.


Maybe you should take a trip to the "other side" and ask them? Btw, I read somewhere 1000+ votes were not counted in WI because they arrived after Nov 3rd. Not enough to change the outcome and there's no count of who the cord were cast. Anotherwords, nothing's changed.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 08:29:19   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
working class stiff wrote:
You don't find it amusing to watch the lemmings drop into a chasm of illogical 'thinking'?

1) the title says voter fraud uncovered, yet mentions nothing about any voting or fraud
2) the respondents assume any of the dead folks still on the rolls, actually 'voted'
3) they also assume that none of the 'dead voters' were Republican
4) the credulous peanut gallery just assumes, without any research, or even a link, that something untoward happened.

No wonder Donald Trump chose to run as a Republican...he knew they would swallow anything he told them, and do so willingly. They deserve each other: he lies as easily as he breathes and they want to be lied to....beats thinking for themselves.
You don't find it amusing to watch the lemmings dr... (show quote)


In my state, you could legally vote by mail starting in oct. If you died before Nov 3rd, your vote still counted and yes, you would be considered to have voted as a dead person. I only point this anomaly put because while true, I suspect out of millions that voted by mail in my state, only a few died between mailing their ballot & election day.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 08:48:13   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
You don't find it amusing to watch the lemmings drop into a chasm of illogical 'thinking'?

1) the title says voter fraud uncovered, yet mentions nothing about any voting or fraud
2) the respondents assume any of the dead folks still on the rolls, actually 'voted'
3) they also assume that none of the 'dead voters' were Republican
4) the credulous peanut gallery just assumes, without any research, or even a link, that something untoward happened.

No wonder Donald Trump chose to run as a Republican...he knew they would swallow anything he told them, and do so willingly. They deserve each other: he lies as easily as he breathes and they want to be lied to....beats thinking for themselves.
You don't find it amusing to watch the lemmings dr... (show quote)


"There is no surge at the border"
"We are only letting children into the country"
"We are sending all the families back where they came from"
"There was no vaccine distribution plan in place"
"The Georgia law stops anyone from drinking or eating while in line"
"The Georgia law stops all voting at 5pm so that working stiffs can not vote"
"I never NEVER said that South Americans should come to the United States"
"Walls do not work"

So who exactly swallows anything they are told? And who is it that lies as easily as he breathes?

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 09:18:55   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
RandyBrian wrote:
"There is no surge at the border"
"We are only letting children into the country"
"We are sending all the families back where they came from"
"There was no vaccine distribution plan in place"
"The Georgia law stops anyone from drinking or eating while in line"
"The Georgia law stops all voting at 5pm so that working stiffs can not vote"
"I never NEVER said that South Americans should come to the United States"
"Walls do not work"

So who exactly swallows anything they are told? And who is it that lies as easily as he breathes?
"There is no surge at the border" br &qu... (show quote)


Way to change the subject. What about this here 'voter fraud' that's the subject of the thread? Care to weigh in some more?

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2021 09:44:07   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
Way to change the subject. What about this here 'voter fraud' that's the subject of the thread? Care to weigh in some more?


Sorry you took it that way. I was not trying to change the subject, just illustrate the silliness of calling Trump a liar and his supporters gullible when President Biden and his supporters are doing EXACTLY what they claim Trump did. As far as the voter fraud is concerned: Here is my thoughts on it:
Your points are valid in this particular thread. No proof that any dead people voted. And yet when republicans try to clean up the voter registration lists and keep them accurate, democrats scream "voter suppression". If republicans make ANY attempt to verify that each voter is eligible, or make sure voting locations are secure from malfeasance, then dems again scream "suppression". Republicans do not like mail in ballots because they are hard to verify legality. The same reason, apparently, that dems WANT them.
So my answer to you is that voting should be reasonably easy, reasonably fast, and absolutely only legal voters and that it should be verifiable and easily and efficiently recounted when necessary. I have and do encourage EVERYONE to learn the issues and vote. However, if anyone is not going to learn the issues, and is going to vote based on what CNN or FOX says or simply vote for whoever had the most ads on TV....I would personally rather they did bother with it. But I will fight and die, if needed, for their right TO vote!
Despite comments to the contrary, there have been a lot of scattered instances of voter fraud.
So why do you think the democrats desire unverifiable voting? I have my opinion. I do not believe the democrats will be happy until all voting is done by anonymous unverifiable text. After all....everyone has a cell phone, even if no photo ID.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 10:24:18   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Sorry you took it that way. I was not trying to change the subject, just illustrate the silliness of calling Trump a liar and his supporters gullible when President Biden and his supporters are doing EXACTLY what they claim Trump did. As far as the voter fraud is concerned: Here is my thoughts on it:
Your points are valid in this particular thread. No proof that any dead people voted. And yet when republicans try to clean up the voter registration lists and keep them accurate, democrats scream "voter suppression". If republicans make ANY attempt to verify that each voter is eligible, or make sure voting locations are secure from malfeasance, then dems again scream "suppression". Republicans do not like mail in ballots because they are hard to verify legality. The same reason, apparently, that dems WANT them.
So my answer to you is that voting should be reasonably easy, reasonably fast, and absolutely only legal voters and that it should be verifiable and easily and efficiently recounted when necessary. I have and do encourage EVERYONE to learn the issues and vote. However, if anyone is not going to learn the issues, and is going to vote based on what CNN or FOX says or simply vote for whoever had the most ads on TV....I would personally rather they did bother with it. But I will fight and die, if needed, for their right TO vote!
Despite comments to the contrary, there have been a lot of scattered instances of voter fraud.
So why do you think the democrats desire unverifiable voting? I have my opinion. I do not believe the democrats will be happy until all voting is done by anonymous unverifiable text. After all....everyone has a cell phone, even if no photo ID.
Sorry you took it that way. I was not trying to c... (show quote)


I don't know why you think that it's only Democrats that are pushing for mail in voting (why did you change it to 'unverifiable'?). Plenty of Republicans and Republican controlled states have and encourage mail in voting.
This was especially true because of the pandemic. But mail in voting was popular with many Republicans even before that.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/voting-by-mail-in-the-swing-states/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/19/republicans-mail-in-voting-trump-398774

Despite the increase in mail in voting in 2020, the Republicans who claim that the system is rife for abuse have been unable to show, much less prove, that any such massive fraud occurred. You mentioned 'scattered' incidents of voter fraud....but that happens every election. There is no evidence that the increase in mail in votes led to an increase in voter fraud. Unless everyone verifying the elections is wrong, and that includes the Justice Dep't., FBI, Dep't of Homeland Security, and all the states certifying the results, and the Congress for electing Biden, and the conspiracists are right, massive voter fraud should be easy to prove.

I suspect if the 'cleaning up' of state voter rolls were actually a bipartisan effort, it could be done fairly quickly. By that I mean as a necessary bureaucratic task, not a political cudgel. Too bad that's not the case. Cleaning up voter rolls is also a different issue than claiming dead people voted massively for the Democrats or that voting machines flipped votes or whatever conspiracy of the day justifies the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

BTW, I do enjoy interacting with you and hope you have a good day today.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 11:03:12   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
I don't know why you think that it's only Democrats that are pushing for mail in voting (why did you change it to 'unverifiable'?). Plenty of Republicans and Republican controlled states have and encourage mail in voting.
This was especially true because of the pandemic. But mail in voting was popular with many Republicans even before that.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/voting-by-mail-in-the-swing-states/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/19/republicans-mail-in-voting-trump-398774

Despite the increase in mail in voting in 2020, the Republicans who claim that the system is rife for abuse have been unable to show, much less prove, that any such massive fraud occurred. You mentioned 'scattered' incidents of voter fraud....but that happens every election. There is no evidence that the increase in mail in votes led to an increase in voter fraud. Unless everyone verifying the elections is wrong, and that includes the Justice Dep't., FBI, Dep't of Homeland Security, and all the states certifying the results, and the Congress for electing Biden, and the conspiracists are right, massive voter fraud should be easy to prove.

I suspect if the 'cleaning up' of state voter rolls were actually a bipartisan effort, it could be done fairly quickly. By that I mean as a necessary bureaucratic task, not a political cudgel. Too bad that's not the case. Cleaning up voter rolls is also a different issue than claiming dead people voted massively for the Democrats or that voting machines flipped votes or whatever conspiracy of the day justifies the 'stolen election' conspiracy.

BTW, I do enjoy interacting with you and hope you have a good day today.
I don't know why you think that it's only Democrat... (show quote)


I acknowledge your points, without necessarily agreeing with them, and I too wish you the very best of everything. I wish everyone on OPP was as nice to have serious discussions of ideas with.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 13:45:51   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
In my state, you could legally vote by mail starting in oct. If you died before Nov 3rd, your vote still counted and yes, you would be considered to have voted as a dead person. I only point this anomaly put because while true, I suspect out of millions that voted by mail in my state, only a few died between mailing their ballot & election day.


In NY? Those were the seniors in nursing homes that Cuomo killed.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.