TexaCan wrote:
I know what he meant...........but perhaps you should worry about correcting your own mistakes FIRST! 😎
“Of course compared to the Trump train the of the tracks, any one else is a much better candidate.”
Would you like to rephrase that sentence and clarify what you attempted to say! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hard to understand, must be wearing a mask.
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
"unqualified"???? she's gonna get on...get used to it!!!!!
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
Calling ACB unqualified tells me all I need to know. I watched the hearings.
Yep! Happens every time! Lack of oxygen!
He lives in the “state of denial” and the “country of confusion!” 😱🤪🧐🤣
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
She’s probably smarter than everyone else in the room!
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Calling ACB unqualified tells me all I need to know. I watched the hearings.
She refused to answer most of the questions. One easy yes or no question she could not answer. She has spent most of her time in a class room.
moldyoldy wrote:
She refused to answer most of the questions. One easy yes or no question she could not answer. She has spent most of her time in a class room.
And you were one cutting classes.
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
That statement is so asinine! Her qualifications extend beyond any political party affiliation.
What is wrong with you that you can't see someone decent within your midst... that goes beyond your prejudices???
I've dealt with 7 year old that made a living for himself on the streets because the parents were so sorry that they laid around drunk collecting welfare checks neglecting the little boy.
Inept and/or immoral judges would remand the child to the biological mother every time that the Police Officers and Social Workers presented his case. Is this the type of judge you want... they were democrats? The hell with their incompetence; they're democrats, so they must be good?
Ginsburg is probably your ideal of a judge being pro-pedophile without qualms of smashing a baby's brains till they stop screaming! I'm not playing political games, Ginsburg was one of the worst people to sit on a bench... probably thought that her prune bitter look was cute.
An article from CNS News reports “Given that homosexual advocates are in a full court press to lower the age of consent as low as it can go, and pro-pedophile sitting Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s documented advocacy of lowering the age of consent to 12 years old, parents should be horrified…”
PulletSurprise wrote:
That statement is so asinine! Her qualifications extend beyond any political party affiliation.
What is wrong with you that you can't see someone decent within your midst... that goes beyond your prejudices???
I've dealt with 7 year old that made a living for himself on the streets because the parents were so sorry that they laid around drunk collecting welfare checks neglecting the little boy.
Inept and/or immoral judges would remand the child to the biological mother every time that the Police Officers and Social Workers presented his case. Is this the type of judge you want... they were democrats? The hell with their incompetence; they're democrats, so they must be good?
Ginsburg is probably your ideal of a judge being pro-pedophile without qualms of smashing a baby's brains till they stop screaming! I'm not playing political games, Ginsburg was one of the worst people to sit on a bench... probably thought that her prune bitter look was cute.
An article from CNS News reports “Given that homosexual advocates are in a full court press to lower the age of consent as low as it can go, and pro-pedophile sitting Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s documented advocacy of lowering the age of consent to 12 years old, parents should be horrified…”
That statement is so asinine! Her qualifications e... (
show quote)
Is this person supposed to be able to rule on the constitution or on the Bible? Her stated beliefs make her unable to be an impartial judge.
moldyoldy wrote:
Is this person supposed to be able to rule on the constitution or on the Bible? Her stated beliefs make her unable to be an impartial judge.
Give one example in her entire career that she has made a ruling based on the Bible instead of the Constitution or the Law! Do you not realize that every judge has personals beliefs, but that does not mean that they will judge on those beliefs. What you have expressed is based only on your opinion, not a fact, unless you can prove it!
moldyoldy wrote:
She refused to answer most of the questions. One easy yes or no question she could not answer. She has spent most of her time in a class room.
It's not at all that she couldn't answer them - it's that she didn't feel it appropriate to enter that area and comment on it. She obviously put those Senators in their place. She is going to make a great justice.
moldyoldy wrote:
Is this person supposed to be able to rule on the constitution or on the Bible? Her stated beliefs make her unable to be an impartial judge.
You're going down a dead end, Moldy.
TexaCan wrote:
Give one example in her entire career that she has made a ruling based on the Bible instead of the Constitution or the Law! Do you not realize that every judge has personals beliefs, but that does not mean that they will judge on those beliefs. What you have expressed is based only on your opinion, not a fact, unless you can prove it!
He can not so he’ll change the subject... Or not reply at all...
Well said, Tex...
lindajoy wrote:
He can not so he’ll change the subject... Or not reply at all...
Well said, Tex...
I see nothing that indicates that she will not be anything but truthful and follow the law, whether it supports the conservative view or the liberal view! I think she will make our country proud of our Judicial System! 👍
TexaCan wrote:
Give one example in her entire career that she has made a ruling based on the Bible instead of the Constitution or the Law! Do you not realize that every judge has personals beliefs, but that does not mean that they will judge on those beliefs. What you have expressed is based only on your opinion, not a fact, unless you can prove it!
She has few legal rulings but she has a lot of opinions expressed in writing and speeches.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.