He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (
show quote)
Maybe advertising the Depends he is wearing.
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (
show quote)
Biden was reading all of his "canned" responses off the tele-prompter, blame his programmers.
At least Biden can still read, comprehension escaped Biden at "partial birth", only his brain was aborted.
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (
show quote)
But he has such a nice smile and calming voice, no reasonable person would be unable to vote for him.
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (
show quote)
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.
The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?
Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (
show quote)
It seems to me that "Packing the Court" has acquired a somewhat negative connotation and I believe that answering it in the affirmative is seen as cutting your throat. That is why I think Biden doesn't want to say, yes on it. Therefore, I think that an "It depends" answer is equivalent to saying "Yes, I intend to support that." He is trying to avoid anything which he thinks is going to look bad for him, like saying it is not anyone's right to know what he is thinking. It didn't get him many points.
bilordinary wrote:
But he has such a nice smile and calming voice, no reasonable person would be unable to vote for him.
You meant unable "not" to vote for him. Of course compared to the Trump train the of the tracks, any one else is a much better candidate.
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.
Ya right, replace her with Mad Max (AKA "The missing link") Waterhead.
bilordinary wrote:
But he has such a nice smile and calming voice, no reasonable person would be unable to vote for him.
Thank God for the unreasonable..............and that Basketfull of Deplorables! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
May our basket grow in size and number! 😎
Tiptop789 wrote:
You meant unable "not" to vote for him. Of course compared to the Trump train the of the tracks, any one else is a much better candidate.
I know what he meant...........but perhaps you should worry about correcting your own mistakes FIRST! 😎
“Of course compared to the Trump train the of the tracks, any one else is a much better candidate.”
Would you like to rephrase that sentence and clarify what you attempted to say! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.