One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
I thought CO2 levels were the highest EVER??
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 20, 2019 09:42:03   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I think that is a big part of it.


along with cutting too many trees. Plant more trees, then you will have more O2.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 10:21:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Owl32 wrote:
along with cutting too many trees. Plant more trees, then you will have more O2.


More trees would be great...

Fewer trees is also fine...

Equilibrium is always achieved in the end...

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 10:46:56   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
More trees would be great...

Fewer trees is also fine...

Equilibrium is always achieved in the end...


I feel certain the decrease in the rain forest has had an impact, at least on CO2 levels, not necessarily warming.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 11:07:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I feel certain the decrease in the rain forest has had an impact, at least on CO2 levels, not necessarily warming.


Absolutely...

Vegetation is an excellent CO2 scrubber...

Now... To connect CO2 to CC (the dangerous kind)...

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 12:35:54   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Absolutely...

Vegetation is an excellent CO2 scrubber...

Now... To connect CO2 to CC (the dangerous kind)...


Exactly. The alarmists make that the "obvious" connection. They are not correct, but in their heads, it's a given.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 12:48:20   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Exactly. The alarmists make that the "obvious" connection. They are not correct, but in their heads, it's a given.

Is it because our schools and colleges are teaching (brain washing) the students who think they are learning
the truth when it is lies rather than FACT. Sad to be educated and still not know the truth.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 13:12:58   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.

The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.

BAD SCIENCE!!!!!!

http://www.newsweek.com/co2-climate-change-early-eocene-scary-1459956
This is an informative article which again, makes ... (show quote)


I saw an article that had made a point of the earthquake in Japan being a 9.0 caused the earth to tip on its axis. This was minute by earth standards but never the less it may have caused conditions to change around the world.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 14:32:30   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Owl32 wrote:
Is it because our schools and colleges are teaching (brain washing) the students who think they are learning
the truth when it is lies rather than FACT. Sad to be educated and still not know the truth.


Ive gotta think you're right.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 14:32:57   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Louie27 wrote:
I saw an article that had made a point of the earthquake in Japan being a 9.0 caused the earth to tip on its axis. This was minute by earth standards but never the less it may have caused conditions to change around the world.


Tiny acts add up.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 16:06:01   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Antartic ice cores revel that CO2 climbing follows global warming not preceeds it. Also, higher CO2 in the atmosphere is better for growing things like food.


Yes it's a very important part of life's cycle.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 16:09:52   #
Carol Kelly
 
Tug484 wrote:
We learned we breathe out carbon dioxide and the plants turn it into CO2.
It makes them green and it keeps us breathing.
Maybe the problem is they've made to many parking lots and cut down too much green stuff .


Also keeps us fed.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 17:21:08   #
Tug484
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I think that is a big part of it.


I do too.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 17:23:14   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.

The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.

BAD SCIENCE!!!!!!

http://www.newsweek.com/co2-climate-change-early-eocene-scary-1459956
This is an informative article which again, makes ... (show quote)


If you want high CO2 you'll have to go to China, but you wouldn't want all the rest.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 22:21:14   #
Auntie Lulu
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Thought the early Eocene was full of plants and critters (large and small)...

Agreed...Not great science..



Reply
Sep 21, 2019 05:56:02   #
William Stewart
 
The bubble heads should be concerned about the falling levels of oxygen. Oxygen levels are down almost 50% below levels in the distant past. last I heard we all HAVE to have oxygen. Also they should Google Maluten Malinkovic if they want to know the real reason for our climate changes.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.