One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Intelligence IG Job Is To Protect This Country Against Intelligence Threats
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 20, 2019 11:41:33   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Every word is true and even dick wrote a book Bop and bragged about being a war criminal so do me a favor don't even bother reading my post I could give a s*** less who what you think or say


Link there clueless. Who's Bop?

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 11:53:22   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Full of what evidence?


Of obstruction, including indictments on others that support it. Evidence that Barr is keeping from congress by the way, evidence supporting the report by number that is part of what gets handed over to the house.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 12:01:12   #
woodguru
 
JFlorio wrote:
Your wasting your time with this stupid troll. Biden actually committed a crime and bragged about it. Woododo had nothing to say. When Biden threatened the President of the Ukraine with the Obama administration withholding 1.2 billion in loans if the Ukraine President didn’t fire the prosecutor investigating Biden’s son.

So far all we know is the phone call had to do with the Ukraine. If the newscaster I was listening to got it right. Nothing else.


Actually it appears it has something to do with Trump using the $250 million in military aid that is for the Ukraine for nothing, to pressure them into giving up information on Biden...Not okay. Besides we really have no idea what is in the WB report, but we are going to have to see. And the fact remains that by law the AG is breaking the law by interfering and obstructing this IG whistle blower protocol. Nowhere in the law does it provide for the acting NID to go to the DOJ.

Obstruction looks like it will result in further details being leaked to the press. This isn't a matter of leaks harming national security, it's a matter of Trump harming national security

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 12:47:06   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
woodguru wrote:
Actually it appears it has something to do with Trump using the $250 million in military aid that is for the Ukraine for nothing, to pressure them into giving up information on Biden...Not okay. Besides we really have no idea what is in the WB report, but we are going to have to see. And the fact remains that by law the AG is breaking the law by interfering and obstructing this IG whistle blower protocol. Nowhere in the law does it provide for the acting NID to go to the DOJ.

Obstruction looks like it will result in further details being leaked to the press. This isn't a matter of leaks harming national security, it's a matter of Trump harming national security
Actually it appears it has something to do with Tr... (show quote)


What a perfect little troll you are.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 12:59:59   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
woodguru wrote:
He says that this whistle blower report going to the house for action is crucial to him doing his job.

This is a top level person. AG Barr of the DOJ has a job, and it is also to support the law and protect the country. Unfortunately he has made it clear he believes his job is to protect the president, that the law doesn't apply to him, that he cannot be held accountable. If Barr knows this is a sensitive breach to the security of our country he is a traitor. If Trump made a self serving promise, he needs to be prosecuted.

Congress and the senate can handle classified information, they can deal with Trump's communications, and if there is nothing there it can be put to rest. The fact is that this is a serious breach of national interests or security. If there is nothing here it needs to be cleared.

This is an urgent matter that has legal requirements to allow congress to do the oversight that is their job. Let it leak if this president obstructs it.

Those who claim to be about the rule of law will be up in arms, unless you don't care about this president violating the law.
He says that this whistle blower report going to t... (show quote)


If this is true then there should be evidence to support such a report. Not just someone making an allegation with out proof positive of a crime. This has happened many times before and has been proven wrong before. We must be careful about believing such reports, especially at this time, against President Trump. If it is true, I sincerely hope not, we should see what ever evidence is supplied to Congress and judge for ourselves. I care about anyone in government violating their oath of office whether it be the President or anyone in Congress or in the intelligence agencies. If this person has lied, he/her must be subject to prosecution. No matter what position they hold in this government. There have been too many who have gotten off scot free in the last few years.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 13:52:13   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Louie27 wrote:
If this is true then there should be evidence to support such a report. Not just someone making an allegation with out proof positive of a crime. This has happened many times before and has been proven wrong before. We must be careful about believing such reports, especially at this time, against President Trump. If it is true, I sincerely hope not, we should see what ever evidence is supplied to Congress and judge for ourselves. I care about anyone in government violating their oath of office whether it be the President or anyone in Congress or in the intelligence agencies. If this person has lied, he/her must be subject to prosecution. No matter what position they hold in this government. There have been too many who have gotten off scot free in the last few years.
If this is true then there should be evidence to s... (show quote)


This is such an obvious attempt from a Trump hater to discredit the President. It's not the job of the intelligence agencies to go running to congress off of hearing one half of a telephone conversation. this will be a big nothing burger.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 15:57:55   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
woodguru wrote:
Not when there is, and there is a Mueller report full of evidence that Barr won't release to congress either.


You'd like Congress to go to jail? By reading the redacted portions they'll be committing a crime.
Oh you seemed so gleeful about Buck yesterday. You left out that he also was a donor to Mr. Peanut, both Clintons and Obama. I look things up that I don't know.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2019 19:44:22   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
woodguru wrote:
Actually it appears it has something to do with Trump using the $250 million in military aid that is for the Ukraine for nothing, to pressure them into giving up information on Biden...Not okay. Besides we really have no idea what is in the WB report, but we are going to have to see. And the fact remains that by law the AG is breaking the law by interfering and obstructing this IG whistle blower protocol. Nowhere in the law does it provide for the acting NID to go to the DOJ.

Obstruction looks like it will result in further details being leaked to the press. This isn't a matter of leaks harming national security, it's a matter of Trump harming national security
Actually it appears it has something to do with Tr... (show quote)


It seems you are, apparently, just taking the talking points of the left, without any actual proof. So very sad.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.