The CIA Democrats is a book recently posted on a website. The book details and exposure of the effective take over of the 2018 Democrats Party Congressional campaign by candidates drawn from the ranks of former Intelligence agents, special forces operatives, veterans (the Omar's potential candidate), of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and civilian National security operatives from the Pentagon and state department.

Sounds like the Obama administration deep state. No it's not about Democrats vs. Republicans, its about evil verses good, immorality vs. morality. Satan's vs. God and TRUTH verses lies and falsehood.

==============
Democracy? None of that is stated in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution. The United States is a Constitutional Republic.
Here is why.

Constitutional Republic:
A constitutional republic is a form of government where the rulers are elected, and the rules are set down in a written constitution. It is often simply called a "republic".The head of state and other representatives are elected but they do not have uncontrolled power. What they may do is written in the constitution. If there is dispute about what the constitution means, this is decided by a court which is independent from the politicians.

The constitution describes how the state may be run. The constitution limits the power of each officeholder. Constitutional republics usually have separation of powers. The separation of powers means that no single officeholder gets unlimited power. John Adams, one of the brilliant framers, said that a constitutional republic was "a government of laws and not of people".

The Constitution have been hijacked by Communist, sexual predators, and foreign forces, which I identify as the forces of darkness.

Thomas Jefferson on Judicial tyranny said; make the Constitution of wax.

Thomas Jefferson was a stanuch advocate of decentralized power, and recognized that a federal government empowered to judge the extent of its own authority was one that would never remain limited.

The case of the missing 13th Amendment to the Constitution. A few years ago a group of lowa Republicans claimed the legitimate 13th Amendment to the Constitution was missing.

The lowa Republicans didn't want the current 13th Amendment banned, they wanted the original one reintroduced for approval.

That missing proposal was called the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA). It sought to ban any American citizen from receiving any foreign (Zionsim) title of Nobility or receiving foreign favor, such as a pension, without congressional approval.

Most Americans Judicial Officers pay their allegiance to Isreal, Zionsim and the homosexual cult, and their black robes mirrors, who control them, the prince of darkness 🤘👹.

In the past I have challenged many of them, to produce proof of jurisdiction and their Delegation of Authority (DOA), they're wasn't able to produce proof, because they aren't constitutional mandated judicial Officers.

I can go into the hidden sercrets of the criminal Enterprise, which violates the U S. Constitution clause of separation of powers.

Attorneys aren't license to practice law, they have Bar Cards, and pay union dues to the Bar Association, they are wards of the state, and a criminal system and Enterprise.

==============
Democracy? None of that is stated in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution. The United States is a Constitutional Republic.
Here is why.

Constitutional Republic:
A constitutional republic is a form of government where the rulers are elected, and the rules are set down in a written constitution. It is often simply called a "republic".The head of state and other representatives are elected but they do not have uncontrolled power. What they may do is written in the constitution. If there is dispute about what the constitution means, this is decided by a court which is independent from the politicians.

The constitution describes how the state may be run. The constitution limits the power of each officeholder. Constitutional republics usually have separation of powers. The separation of powers means that no single officeholder gets unlimited power. John Adams, one of the brilliant framers, said that a constitutional republic was "a government of laws and not of people".

Snip>>No determinations are carried, it is true, in a simple representative democracy, but by consent of the majority or their representatives. John Adams (1784)

And the same two meanings of "democracy" (sometimes direct democracy, sometimes popular self-government more generally) existed at the founding of the republic as well. Some framing-era commentators made arguments that distinguished "democracy" and "republic"; see, for instance, the Federalist (No. 10), as well as other numbers of the Federalist papers. But even in that era, "representative democracy" was understood as a form of democracy, alongside "pure democracy": John Adams used the term "representative democracy" in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker's Blackstone likewise uses "democracy" to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier "representative" is omitted.

Is that enough of the founders for you? If the founders saw us as a representative democracy how is it you have decided that we are not...because somehow being of the people is offensive to you?

And I find it 'cute' that you would bring up the emoluments clause since your king panders for money left and right without any objection from you cons...

The constitution doesn't generally contradict itself very much, the bible a bit more. So those who believe in god, what do they believe when the bible sends mixed messages, which ones do people go by? Many go by the message that is what they want to believe, that fits their personal beliefs. One christian adheres to tenets of loving their fellow man and they have a tolerance for gays, others flip out about gays and latch onto words that are harsher about gays.

My point being the basic fundamental premise of a democracy is one person one vote, all votes being equal whether they be a black, white, hispanic, or muslim.

The concept of taking the power of their one vote away from people is anti constitutional to the core. Given the one person one vote basis there is a conflict of interest that needs to be sorted. Either say we are not a democracy by the people for the people or take a hard look at the very concept of what an electoral college is and what it's for, and determine whether that is more important than the core premise. The united states is the only country in the world that deviates from one person one vote, and it is an idiotic concept.

States have their sovereignty in singular state issues that the rest of the country can't dictate to them that their state government can set the rules on, the united states has an obligation to provide the same basic rights to everyone in the country concerning civil rights. Election rules need to be adopted that standardize rules and procedures that work so that states can't monkey with people's ability to vote the way several states are.

As pointed out by Hayes, since 1992 republicans have won the popular one time but had three presidents, if it were the other way the electoral would have been eliminated a long time ago. Republicans can keep their red states and do whatever they want for those states, but America is unfortunately a dem majority country and the rules need to favor that majority. This minority controlled country is destroying democracy to keep control.

https://dennismichaellynch.com/video-msnbcs-chris-hayes-if-the-electoral-college-wasnt-in-the-constitution-it-would-be-unconstitutional/

Yes, full definitions with references. You know, the usual...

What's funny Blade is that I can tell that you didn't even read what I wrote. To the founders, a Republic and a representative democracy were one and the same. But hey, cherry-pick away, how else could you believe anything...

Here's my question to you Blade how do we elect our representatives if not by individual vote for a individual person with the one who holds the majority the winner? Is that not what we do in a democracy? Even the electoral college is set up for a majority. Our house and senate vote by majority and even SCOTUS is predicated by majority. These are all principles of democracy Blade and if you do not think so then don't vote and that will settle that, problem solved...

Snip>>No determinations are carried, it is true, in a simple representative democracy, but by consent of the majority or their representatives. John Adams (1784)

And the same two meanings of "democracy" (sometimes direct democracy, sometimes popular self-government more generally) existed at the founding of the republic as well. Some framing-era commentators made arguments that distinguished "democracy" and "republic"; see, for instance, the Federalist (No. 10), as well as other numbers of the Federalist papers. But even in that era, "representative democracy" was understood as a form of democracy, alongside "pure democracy": John Adams used the term "representative democracy" in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker's Blackstone likewise uses "democracy" to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier "representative" is omitted.

Is that enough of the founders for you? If the founders saw us as a representative democracy how is it you have decided that we are not...because somehow being of the people is offensive to you?

And I find it 'cute' that you would bring up the emoluments clause since your king panders for money left and right without any objection from you cons...

The Bible does not contradict itself..
The Constitution does not contradict itself.
People interpret what they read in different ways.
No one's vote is "taken away".
America is neither a secular nation nor is it a democracy.
America is a Republic founded on the moral principles of Christianity.
Our government is not America, and it is not a theocracy.
40% of Americans are conservative,
35% of Americans are moderate,
21% of Americans are liberal,
70% of Americans are religious.
21% of Americans have no religion,
3% of Americans are atheists,
5% of Americans are agnostic.
The 17th Amendment should be repealed.