One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
There Is A True And Legal Definition To Racism, And It Is Actionable
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 17, 2019 13:55:06   #
woodguru
 
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be easily checked.

There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

The language as I remember it covered things like taunting a person because of their language, their hair, their clothes, the obvious color of their skin...all the things that involve ethnic identification, and then there is wordage about specifically telling them to "go back where they came from".

So here's the question and obvious conclusion...can the POTUS openly do something that is a civil rights violation by statute that results in termination from a job, legal settlements by the company if they've allowed it, and possible prosecution as a hate crime?

In any real world the president should not be allowed to go there. Meanwhile the right continues to go through mind bending denials that the president is not a racist. Trump says there are many people who agree with him, proving only that there are many racists in this country.

It used to be that it was understood that the president needed to be held to the highest standards of ethical and moral behavior, and now we have this lowest common denominator.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:09:58   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
As usual, a quick attack from the usual source based on cheap, main stream media sound bites. The four, democrat, political whores have been in personal political attack mode since being elected. Anybody recall, "Impeach thr mother f*cker." He just gave them a well deserved taste of their own sh*t.

Oh, Trump is not a racist. But I'll bet you are. You're just isn't worth going through all your racist posts to prove it. But we see it day after day.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:16:03   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
woodguru wrote:
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be easily checked.

There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

The language as I remember it covered things like taunting a person because of their language, their hair, their clothes, the obvious color of their skin...all the things that involve ethnic identification, and then there is wordage about specifically telling them to "go back where they came from".

So here's the question and obvious conclusion...can the POTUS openly do something that is a civil rights violation by statute that results in termination from a job, legal settlements by the company if they've allowed it, and possible prosecution as a hate crime?

In any real world the president should not be allowed to go there. Meanwhile the right continues to go through mind bending denials that the president is not a racist. Trump says there are many people who agree with him, proving only that there are many racists in this country.

It used to be that it was understood that the president needed to be held to the highest standards of ethical and moral behavior, and now we have this lowest common denominator.
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be eas... (show quote)


I see these accusations are accompanied by your usual amount of documentation: Zero.

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 14:29:07   #
Sew_What
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I see these accusations are accompanied by your usual amount of documentation: Zero.


Why don't you go back to the cartoon you came from...?

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:30:17   #
The Critical Critic Loc: Turtle Island
 
woodguru wrote:
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be easily checked.

There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

The language as I remember it covered things like taunting a person because of their language, their hair, their clothes, the obvious color of their skin...all the things that involve ethnic identification, and then there is wordage about specifically telling them to "go back where they came from".

So here's the question and obvious conclusion...can the POTUS openly do something that is a civil rights violation by statute that results in termination from a job, legal settlements by the company if they've allowed it, and possible prosecution as a hate crime?

In any real world the president should not be allowed to go there. Meanwhile the right continues to go through mind bending denials that the president is not a racist. Trump says there are many people who agree with him, proving only that there are many racists in this country.

It used to be that it was understood that the president needed to be held to the highest standards of ethical and moral behavior, and now we have this lowest common denominator.
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be eas... (show quote)

Quote:
There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

Woodguru, this is your topic, the onus is on you to do the leg work, not someone else.

Telling someone to go back to their country is not racism. Whose hair, clothes, or skin color did President Trump “taunt” - pretty sure that’s a misuse of the word, but anyway, even if you wanted to use a stronger term like “hate speech”, the SCOTUS has already determined hate speech is still free speech.

A violation of their civil rights... that’s a good one!

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:34:35   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Sew_What wrote:
Why don't you go back to the cartoon you came from...?


Why don't you embark on an unlikely anatomical excursion?

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:42:31   #
son of witless
 
woodguru wrote:
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be easily checked.

There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

The language as I remember it covered things like taunting a person because of their language, their hair, their clothes, the obvious color of their skin...all the things that involve ethnic identification, and then there is wordage about specifically telling them to "go back where they came from".

So here's the question and obvious conclusion...can the POTUS openly do something that is a civil rights violation by statute that results in termination from a job, legal settlements by the company if they've allowed it, and possible prosecution as a hate crime?

In any real world the president should not be allowed to go there. Meanwhile the right continues to go through mind bending denials that the president is not a racist. Trump says there are many people who agree with him, proving only that there are many racists in this country.

It used to be that it was understood that the president needed to be held to the highest standards of ethical and moral behavior, and now we have this lowest common denominator.
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be eas... (show quote)


Waaaaaah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 15:04:12   #
Larai Loc: Fallon, NV
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Why don't you embark on an unlikely anatomical excursion?


LOL!.. good one! Nope! I have yet to see evidence from most of the haters here on the left..

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 15:25:00   #
Hug
 
You may not be a racist, but I am. My forefathers fought and defeated the French, the British, the Spanish, the Mexicans and the Indians to win this country and they fought to free the slaves and the slaves fought and won equality and finally the country was glued together to become the greatest country in the history of civilizations. I will not turn this country over to four young girls and their following who have no ties to our country and have not shared the American experience.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 15:30:52   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
woodguru wrote:
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be easily checked.

There was a segment I saw Tuesday night that covered the actual legal statute against workplace discrimination and racism, it is actionable, and it's a crime to cross the line...perhaps someone can actually do the work and provide the statute and definitions?

The language as I remember it covered things like taunting a person because of their language, their hair, their clothes, the obvious color of their skin...all the things that involve ethnic identification, and then there is wordage about specifically telling them to "go back where they came from".

So here's the question and obvious conclusion...can the POTUS openly do something that is a civil rights violation by statute that results in termination from a job, legal settlements by the company if they've allowed it, and possible prosecution as a hate crime?

In any real world the president should not be allowed to go there. Meanwhile the right continues to go through mind bending denials that the president is not a racist. Trump says there are many people who agree with him, proving only that there are many racists in this country.

It used to be that it was understood that the president needed to be held to the highest standards of ethical and moral behavior, and now we have this lowest common denominator.
This is fact, has printed statutes, and can be eas... (show quote)
Once again.

For two and a half years, democrat progressives have been verbally and graphically attacking Trump, his wife, his family, his friends, his associates, and every member of his administration, you've called them every obscene name in the book. You have compared Trump to Hitler, Stalin and Satan, You have demanded Trump be impeached, imprisoned, exiled, banished from the face of the earth, even assassinated. You have called him a racist, a xenophobe, homophobe, pedophile, rapist, a moron, a pumpkinfuhrer, orange orangutan, and a c**k suker. You have called our First Lady a whore, a b*tch, a porn star, eye candy, mail order bride, and every other obscenity you could think of.

Need I even mention the very real and massive covert campaign to destroy Donald Trump, his wife, his family, and his administration?

One of those females was born here, the other immigrated, and it is patently obvious they are loyal to an ideology diametrically opposed to our American way of life, our constitution, and our system of government and justice.

And, you are going to sit there a call president Trump a racist because he told two bigoted, anti-Semitic, pro-Sharia Muslims to go back to where they came from? They came from Islam and they brought it with them.







Reply
Jul 17, 2019 15:43:34   #
Larai Loc: Fallon, NV
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Once again.

For two and a half years, democrat progressives have been verbally and graphically attacking Trump, his wife, his family, his friends, his associates, and every member of his administration, you've called them every obscene name in the book. You have compared Trump to Hitler, Stalin and Satan, You have demanded Trump be impeached, imprisoned, exiled, banished from the face of the earth, even assassinated. You have called him a racist, a xenophobe, homophobe, pedophile, rapist, a moron, a pumpkinfuhrer, orange orangutan, and a c**k suker. You have called our First Lady a whore, a b*tch, a porn star, eye candy, mail order bride, and every other obscenity you could think of.

Need I even mention the very real and massive covert campaign to destroy Donald Trump, his wife, his family, and his administration?

One of those females was born here, the other immigrated, and it is patently obvious they are loyal to an ideology diametrically opposed to our American way of life, our constitution, and our system of government and justice.

And, you are going to sit there a call president Trump a racist because he told two bigoted, anti-Semitic, pro-Sharia Muslims to go back to where they came from? They came from Islam and they brought it with them.
Once again. br br For two and a half years, democ... (show quote)


Excellent Post!
They can dish it out... but they damn sure can't take it!! They get all butt hurt!! Omar shouldn't even be in this country much less in congress.. lied on her application for naturalization, father is a nasty ass war criminal.. They (left) have set the bar pretty low for getting into gov't.. they started on Trump before he was even elected and continue to do so... frankly, I have yet to hear a truly by definition racist comments From Trump.. As far as telling the 4 to go home.. well home is where the heart is after all and their hearts are in Islam and also socialism..I guess these 4 mouthy broads don't get they will be the first on the chopping block if sharia law ever comes to pass.. It already has in these muslim enclaves throughout the US..

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 16:20:27   #
Sew_What
 
Larai wrote:
LOL!.. good one! Nope! I have yet to see evidence from most of the haters here on the left..


That's because you're a Russian troll.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 16:22:55   #
Larai Loc: Fallon, NV
 
Sew_What wrote:
That's because you're a Russian troll.


When the name calling begins it means you've run out of intelligent things to say.. OR you do not have the vocabulary to carry off an intelligent conversation!

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 16:26:14   #
Sew_What
 
Larai wrote:
When the name calling begins it means you've run out of intelligent things to say.. OR you do not have the vocabulary to carry off an intelligent conversation!


And agreeing with an idiot makes, you what? An idiot? How's that for a definition.

I guess you don't like being called a Russian Troll, you must be one.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 17:04:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Larai wrote:
When the name calling begins it means you've run out of intelligent things to say.. OR you do not have the vocabulary to carry off an intelligent conversation!


You know, some people don't have many arrows in their quiver to begin with. Doesn't take long to run out when you start low.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.