One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Earthquakes!!!! World Events are happening. Are you in a high risk location?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 17, 2019 01:33:06   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
JFlorio wrote:
Please tell me they’re not man made quake change.


Of course its Almighty Trump's fault,dont ya know???

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 01:46:11   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
proud republican wrote:
Heeey,what about us Republicans???We still live in this shithole....


It gets worse every day! We have 1/4 of the Illegals. We have 1/3 the homeless. And now we are paying the healthcare for illegals while veterans are living on the street. Granted that some homeless are there through no fault of their own. Many are mentally ill, drug abusers, alcoholics, gamblers, and a whole host of other social ills are factors that we have been making acceptable for the past several decades. It started with the Lottery and then Indian Casinos. Do we really need more policies that encourage the homeless to come to CA where it is becoming more difficult to buy a home because of government policies and regulations? The average CA home is 80% overpriced because of Democrat politicians. How did we fall so far so fast? In a word; Social Democrats wanting to build a Utopia (Oops, that was 7 words.).

I remember in the 1960s KRLA radio used to run a skit. I think it might have been written by the Committee (A SF Comedy Group. I think Lenny and Squiggy from Laverne and Shirley show were members and got their start there). It went something like this:
"Howdy friends, this is Sam Andreas speaking to you from Faulty Realty. Folks, how would you like to have your very own beachfront lot, clear out in the middle of the desert?"

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 02:31:47   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
dtucker300 wrote:
What link, if any, do you see between global warming and earthquakes?



I don't see a link between Climate change and earthquakes as having a relationship.

Volcanoes and earthquakes do have a link and Volcanoes do have an effect on climate change.

Several years ago a study was done (I don't recall the source, I'm certain that the internet is full of the report summaries and conclusions) which concluded Volcanoes have no relationship with Climate change.
I just happened to be researching the increases in Volcanoes and earthquakes and entered a discussion on Climate change. My study on Volcanic increases came in handy and here is why I link volcanoes to Climate and not just weather.
Pre sixties and a few thousand years prior, the earth had +/- 5-6 eruptions per month and over each decade increased slowly until around the mid nineties the frequency surged and now we have an average of +/- 10 volcanic eruptions each and every day. Another factor was the intensity of the eruptions from an average explosion 10"000-14,000 feet to a more common 30,000-40,000 foot explosion and just a few weeks ago the largest in several decades two major eruptions 68,000 feet, the other 50,000 which is a majority contributing factor to the planets plates movement and increased magnitudes across the globe I'm reporting on now.
But back to the link. The research report stating no link between volcanoes and Climate.. At the time I read the decade old report Volcanoes have increase over 2000% and that was several years ago, since the increase has gone up a few hundred percent.
So the amount of ash, Sulphurs and a dozens of other gases that circle our atmosphere are playing into our extremes of hot and cold. Geologist have proven that the effect of a Super Volcano would put us in a mini ice age. Science is now saying we are headed into a cooling, go figure what today's eruptions daily compare to a super volcanic eruption when scaled for comparisons.

Be safe,
Be prepared,
Jack

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 03:16:35   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Not unless you live in Oklahoma which I believe has more earthquakes than any state due to Fracking. But these are not the same as Deep tectonic induced quakes,



Your correct, Deep earthquakes are energy hammering from energy within the earth, up on the underside of the plate boundaries at 9 points (locations) and earthquakes at drill points are shallow earthquakes. The energy travels through the plate seeking out weak spots. Man drill points are perforations (think of drilling small holes in a brick) that cause weak spots. Over 90 % of earthquakes are at volcanoes, volcanic fields, volcanic deformations in the earth's crust (weak points, thinner points) and man drill points. Look up any earthquake in Oklahoma on Google Earth and see thousands of drill pads the other factor is Oklahoma sits at the edge of the Craton which is the more unstable portion, thinner portion of the Plate.

Jack

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 03:22:04   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
JFlorio wrote:
Just saying put I think that's a crock. Fracking does not cause earth quakes'



Fracking does not cause earthquakes. Your right, it's the drilling that causes the weak points that the energy seeks out.

👍

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 03:31:13   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Any chance a big one will slip California into the ocean and save America, Just kidding. Keep it coming.




There's a better chance that Pelosi and her immigration polices will bring so many illegals that the land will sink under the weight of the millions of middle eastern, South Americans running to sacurary cities. Lol

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 08:02:50   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Deep Earthquake

Date & time: Wednesday, 17 July 2019 05:58 UTC
Magnitude: 4.5
Depth: 183.0 km
Epicenter latitude / longitude: 4.11°S / 150.98°E  (Papua New Guinea)
Nearest volcano: unnamed (73 km)
Primary data source: BMKG
Estimated released energy: 3.5*10^11 J (98.6 MWh / 84.8 tons of TNT

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 13:01:07   #
Dinty
 
teabag09 wrote:
Jack, your posts are being read and being appreciated but I don't know how most of us would respond being that we know very little of the subject. I could respond with I know if Yellowstone blows it will be a mess for a lot of people. I could and should ask you if these quakes are any indication that Yellowstone is closer to blowing or are they separate animals. Also how about Mt. Rainer. Is it tied to these plate movements? I've read about and somewhat understand the ring of fire but not with a lot of scientific knowledge.

Please keep posting with the knowledge that you are being read. I live on the extreme east coast of Virginia where though we have had tremors the chance of an earth quake of any consequence is rare. We on the other hand do need to think about a mud slide in the Norfolk Canyon which would probably send a Tidal wave 30 miles inshore.

Keep them coming Jack, you're being heard. Mike
Jack, your posts are being read and being apprecia... (show quote)


I'm with you. I look forward to Jacks predictions. Keep up the good work.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 13:38:14   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Fracking does not cause earthquakes. Your right, it's the drilling that causes the weak points that the energy seeks out.

👍


This news from CA today. Keep in mind that Ridgecrest is east of Bakersfield.

Good morning, and welcome to the Essential California newsletter from the L.A. Times. It’s Wednesday, July 17, and I’m writing from Los Angeles. - Julia Wick

California as a paragon of environmentalism is a loud narrative — one that has shaped headlines and stereotypes and even attitudes, especially in the big cities. The state has been a pioneer on vehicle emissions standards, air pollution legislation and efficiency standards, to name just a few areas of national leadership.

But oil has also played an integral role in the California narrative for nearly a century and a half, since the state’s first real oil well struck “black gold” in 1876. That black gold shaped early 20th-century Southern California, powering the growth of Los Angeles and making fortunes for many of the families whose names still adorn streets and buildings around the state. And that importance is far from confined to history books.

State oil production has been steadily arcing downward since the mid-1980s, but California remains one of the nation’s top petroleum-producing — and gasoline-consuming — states. Until recently, we still produced more oil than any other state but Texas and North Dakota (the Golden State has since slipped to sixth place). Oil and gas companies are also potent political forces that wield major influence in the state Capitol.

[See also: The Center for Investigative Reporting’s 2017 look at “Big Oil’s grip on California”]

The duality of the “two Californias” is a shopworn cliché, but, like many clichés, it prevails for a reason. There is the California of electric cars, kitchen compost bins and vocal opposition to President Trump’s climate policies. Then there is the California of Kern County, where oil and gas production remain a pillar of the local economy and more than 70% of California’s oil and natural gas is produced. The reach of that latter California extends far beyond the southern tip of the San Joaquin Valley — in the first quarter of 2019, the top two spenders on lobbying at the statehouse were Chevron and the broader trade group that represents oil companies.

The constant push-and-pull between California environmentalism and its oil fields came to a public head late last week. On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom fired the state’s top oil regulator after learning that fracking permits had doubled without his knowledge since he became governor, and some of the supervisors tasked with regulating the industry owned shares in major oil companies.

On Friday, news broke that a Chevron oil well in Kern County had leaked nearly 800,000 gallons of crude petroleum and water into a dry creek bed about 35 miles west of Bakersfield over the past two months. The mixture was about one-third oil and two-thirds water, and the flow has since ceased, according to the state Department of Conservation. The seep occurred in an oil field where Chevron uses a process called steam injection to extract underground crude oil.

Ted Goldberg, an editor at KQED News who often reports on Bay Area refineries, uncovered the spill while searching a government database for updates on an entirely separate incident at Chevron’s Richmond refinery in Northern California. “In May, Chevron officials began noticing that oil and water started coming up from the ground when it shouldn’t,” Goldberg explained. “It lasted for a little while and then it stopped. And then on two other occasions since then, it started [again]. The agency that’s responsible for regulating this stuff has been criticized, basically, for doing not an aggressive job in general.”

[Read “Chevron Well at Center of Major Oil Spill in Kern County Oil Field” by Ted Goldberg in KQED]

“Chevron and the state agency that regulates oil and gas and the state water regulators have all emphasized that there’s no drinking water supplies in the area, that there’s no harm to wildlife,” Goldberg said. “And as you can probably expect, environmentalists disagree with that.”

Hollin Kretzmann, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit environmental group, said the damage potentially caused by the spill “still remains to be seen.” Kretzmann characterized the spill as a larger failure of government regulation, calling it “the end result of regulations that are completely inadequate to prevent these accidents from happening and protect the public and the environment.”

“We can’t be a leader in climate change and protecting the environment if we’re one of the biggest oil and gas producers in the country,” Kretzmann said, touching on the two competing visions of California at play.

The long-term future of oil and gas production in the state remains to be seen. Many environmental groups have been hopeful that Newsom may move to curtail it. The state budget that the new governor signed last month did include a $1.5-million item to study ways to reduce petroleum supply and demand, which certainly seems promising to their cause. But nothing — especially in California — is ever black and white, and an environmentalist victory would also probably deliver deep economic blows to the oil towns of Kern.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 14:37:47   #
Sew_What
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
YOU MAY BE AT HIGH RISK DEPENDING ON WHERE YOU LIVE.


For several weeks I have been forecasting earthquakes. Posting earthquake locations, magnitudes, 7-10 days before they strike with over an 80%++ accuracy.

If you read through my last post you may want to ask if your location is at risk in the days ahead.

I'm somewhat confused about the low interest of comments on my post considering we are having a planet wide unprecedented event happening the last several weeks and energy is increasing. Considering every plate on our planet is being pushed and at Unrest. The energy in the Ridgecrest region of California is still having over 300 notable earthquakes in a 70 by 70 mile area and building pressure. Pressure is pushing exactly as I forecast into Montana, Oklahoma among other states on the edge of the Craton just as I said they would and even more larger magnitude earthquakes will strike in locations I specified in my other post.b

I'm nervous and concerned about the record Deep earthquakes and the amount of energy that will be pushed into the States.

The 6.5 and 7.1 that hit California I forecast 10 days before they happened.
I then assigned a 5 day watch for a 7.5-7.6 which didn't strike but remember I'm assigning the days and what the few of us in the world that forecast earthquakes with accuracy, what we don't understand is why energy stalls and the exact location and magnitude do happen but in 4 days or 12 days. I know if an earthquake will strike but many times a 5 day watch expires only to have the earthquake strike a few days later.

Since more energy is coming into California than releasing east, California is still primed for the larger quake.

Here is a link to my last post of why every news station, network and Radio should be advising citizens to be prepared that lives in a state on the edge of the Craton.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-161322-1.html
YOU MAY BE AT HIGH RISK DEPENDING ON WHERE YOU LIV... (show quote)


What is a Craton?

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 15:03:32   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
No they are not man made or warfare testing.
There are only 9 locations on our planet that have deep earthquakes. Think about that for a minute..... You could put 9 X's on a map of the globe and pin every deep earthquake in the same specific locations.

Every earthquake on the planet is born from deep earthquakes or another way to put it.... A quake in Colorado can be traced back to the Indonesia Region.... Think about that for a few minutes.

I give more details in my previous post but please ask questions.

Right now I'm trying to get peoples attention to how serious it is to have pressure with every plate on the planet being moved.

Be safe,
Be prepared,
Jack
No they are not man made or warfare testing. br ... (show quote)


That's very unusual, isn't it? I've always equated volcanic activity with ongoing earthquakes. Like a warning system telling u to wake up and pay attention if your in close range of a volcano

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2019 16:23:35   #
grace scott
 
Jack,

Just because I don't reply to your posts, does not mean I don't read them. When I open OPP, your posts are the first thing I look for.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 16:27:23   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
dtucker300 wrote:
This news from CA today. Keep in mind that Ridgecrest is east of Bakersfield.

Good morning, and welcome to the Essential California newsletter from the L.A. Times. It’s Wednesday, July 17, and I’m writing from Los Angeles. - Julia Wick

California as a paragon of environmentalism is a loud narrative — one that has shaped headlines and stereotypes and even attitudes, especially in the big cities. The state has been a pioneer on vehicle emissions standards, air pollution legislation and efficiency standards, to name just a few areas of national leadership.

But oil has also played an integral role in the California narrative for nearly a century and a half, since the state’s first real oil well struck “black gold” in 1876. That black gold shaped early 20th-century Southern California, powering the growth of Los Angeles and making fortunes for many of the families whose names still adorn streets and buildings around the state. And that importance is far from confined to history books.

State oil production has been steadily arcing downward since the mid-1980s, but California remains one of the nation’s top petroleum-producing — and gasoline-consuming — states. Until recently, we still produced more oil than any other state but Texas and North Dakota (the Golden State has since slipped to sixth place). Oil and gas companies are also potent political forces that wield major influence in the state Capitol.

[See also: The Center for Investigative Reporting’s 2017 look at “Big Oil’s grip on California”]

The duality of the “two Californias” is a shopworn cliché, but, like many clichés, it prevails for a reason. There is the California of electric cars, kitchen compost bins and vocal opposition to President Trump’s climate policies. Then there is the California of Kern County, where oil and gas production remain a pillar of the local economy and more than 70% of California’s oil and natural gas is produced. The reach of that latter California extends far beyond the southern tip of the San Joaquin Valley — in the first quarter of 2019, the top two spenders on lobbying at the statehouse were Chevron and the broader trade group that represents oil companies.

The constant push-and-pull between California environmentalism and its oil fields came to a public head late last week. On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom fired the state’s top oil regulator after learning that fracking permits had doubled without his knowledge since he became governor, and some of the supervisors tasked with regulating the industry owned shares in major oil companies.

On Friday, news broke that a Chevron oil well in Kern County had leaked nearly 800,000 gallons of crude petroleum and water into a dry creek bed about 35 miles west of Bakersfield over the past two months. The mixture was about one-third oil and two-thirds water, and the flow has since ceased, according to the state Department of Conservation. The seep occurred in an oil field where Chevron uses a process called steam injection to extract underground crude oil.

Ted Goldberg, an editor at KQED News who often reports on Bay Area refineries, uncovered the spill while searching a government database for updates on an entirely separate incident at Chevron’s Richmond refinery in Northern California. “In May, Chevron officials began noticing that oil and water started coming up from the ground when it shouldn’t,” Goldberg explained. “It lasted for a little while and then it stopped. And then on two other occasions since then, it started [again]. The agency that’s responsible for regulating this stuff has been criticized, basically, for doing not an aggressive job in general.”

[Read “Chevron Well at Center of Major Oil Spill in Kern County Oil Field” by Ted Goldberg in KQED]

“Chevron and the state agency that regulates oil and gas and the state water regulators have all emphasized that there’s no drinking water supplies in the area, that there’s no harm to wildlife,” Goldberg said. “And as you can probably expect, environmentalists disagree with that.”

Hollin Kretzmann, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit environmental group, said the damage potentially caused by the spill “still remains to be seen.” Kretzmann characterized the spill as a larger failure of government regulation, calling it “the end result of regulations that are completely inadequate to prevent these accidents from happening and protect the public and the environment.”

“We can’t be a leader in climate change and protecting the environment if we’re one of the biggest oil and gas producers in the country,” Kretzmann said, touching on the two competing visions of California at play.

The long-term future of oil and gas production in the state remains to be seen. Many environmental groups have been hopeful that Newsom may move to curtail it. The state budget that the new governor signed last month did include a $1.5-million item to study ways to reduce petroleum supply and demand, which certainly seems promising to their cause. But nothing — especially in California — is ever black and white, and an environmentalist victory would also probably deliver deep economic blows to the oil towns of Kern.
This news from CA today. Keep in mind that Ridgec... (show quote)


Fine. Shut down and enjoy the climate while you starve to death.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 17:56:45   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
JFlorio wrote:
Fine. Shut down and enjoy the climate while you starve to death.


We don't really know very much in the great scheme of things even though our knowledge of the natural world is expanding exponentially. Do you think we can outrun the damage we do with new technology?

Reply
Jul 19, 2019 02:22:09   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
I'm struggling to keep up with the extreme earthquake activity with life's many present time constraints. I prefer time and detail in my updates.

But, here it goes in rough cut


UPDATE.........

+/- since my last post there have been another 7 Deep Earthquakes.

Look for increased magnitude push into Alaska.

I'm calling for more earthquakes of Vancouver Island /Straights of Juan D Fuca in the 5.6-6.3 magnitude.

Also look for off shore Oregon /Far Northern California 5.-6 magnitude.

Geysers will be increasing again and as my forecast for 4 and 5 magnitude earthquakes off the edge of the Craton, per my last forecast these areas where hit and look for more of the same. Western Montana,, Southern Idaho, Central /South Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas, Tennessee and swarms in Western Texas and the Christmas Volcanic Fields in Texas again with larger 4-5 magnitude. Philadelphia /New York /Maine will be in this push.

Alaska is our first to watch swarms in the islands with more 5's coming in than last forecast and 6 to mid 6 magnitude with a watch for 7 magnitude same locations.

California : I think the log jam in the Ridgecrest region I have been reporting is a result of energy coming down the creeping section of the San Andreas fault and transferring over to the Ridgecrest region, then log jamming with trickles of energy moving east along the Craton instead of it flowing east with energy leaving as fast as it moves in. I believe this is happening as a result of higher than normal energy from adnormaly high frequency of Deep earthquakes in Indonesia and the record Volcanoe) strength) eruptions, two in a 24 hour period.
Now I'm more clear on two scenarios. One, if the energy moves east as normal then look for dozens of 4/5 and a few 6 magnitude earthquakes to strike states on the edge of the Craton. If the log jam remains then I'm forecasting a 7-7,6 magnitude to Strike within 200 miles of the Ridgecrest region.

I'm still forecasting there to be 7 - 8 magnitude in the Indonesia region.

Be safe,
Be prepared,
Jack

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.