factnotfiction

And he should keep screaming and tweeting for the next 16 months.

The screeching he does, the more frightened he looks, not to mention being erratic in his behavior

But that will be for the voters in 4 key states to decide, and Michigan and Pennsylvania are running away from trump, and Wisconsin may join in soon




http://nypost.com/2019/07/14/biden-sanders-and-warren-all-lead-trump-in-2020-poll/

Smedley_buzkill

I wish there was some way you could live in a society such as you think Liberal Democrats will provide. Your butthurt squalling could be heard on Mars.

EmilyD

New York Post....AHhhhahahahaha!

Smedley_buzkill

They said the same thing last election, right up to the point where Trump won.

tommsteyer

the same information sources that predicted Trump would lose last time?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

bylm1-Bernie

Maybe he could move to Caracas for just a few months!

vernon

Hey that dumb arse will only believe the lying msm.I think it a sign of retardation .

Rose42

I also use that site sometimes but it needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Here's a bit from an interesting article that asks "who cares" about media bias.

https://www.cjr.org/innovations/measure-media-bias-partisan.php

Google “media bias,” and you’ll find Media Bias/Fact Check, run by armchair media analyst Dave Van Zandt. The site’s methodology is simple: Van Zandt and his team rate each outlet from 0 to 10 on the categories of biased wording and headlines, factuality and sourcing, story choices (“does the source report news from both sides”), and political affiliation.

A similar effort is “The Media Bias Chart,” or simply, “The Chart.” Created by Colorado patent attorney Vanessa Otero, the chart has gone through several methodological iterations, but currently is based on her evaluation of outlets’ stories on dimensions of veracity, fairness, and expression.

Both efforts suffer from the very problem they’re trying to address: Their subjective assessments leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in. Compared to Gentzkow and Shapiro, the five to 20 stories typically judged on these sites represent but a drop of mainstream news outlets’ production.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

98% of media reports on Donald Trump have been negative, from mildly accusatory to extraordinarily vicious.

Fake news has become small potatoes compared to the growing number of fake human beings.

There are very few so-called "journalists" in the MSM today who embrace the ethics of real journalism--Truth and Accuracy, Impartiality and Fairness, Humanity and Accountability, Objectivity and Independence. The greatest percentage of reporting today is politically driven prejudices and ideological biases.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

As is the readership, my friend. People believe as they choose, 'fake news' or facts be damned.

factnotfiction

Well finally something I agree with you on.

And your last sentence is true about both sides, especially the "opinion news format" that has become so popular

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Agreed, Rose. But, I was simply pointing out that the NY Post is no bastion for liberal viewpoints.

Some posters may have it confused with The NY Daily News or even The NY Times.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

There are some whose belief system is grounded on something far more substantive and sustaining than simply choices.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Not nearly enough, Blade.