rumitoid wrote:
I like droll. What is really funny, though, is that you state "ninety percent of mainstream media" is negative towards the president: it never seems to occur to you people that the Free Press is not negative towards the president but that many of his words and actions are negatively effecting and affecting our country.
Better than ninety percent of the things he says or does warrant a negative “Free Press”?
Another word just came to mind; absurd.
Quote:
When a teacher marks a wrong answer on an exam, does he or she have a negative attitude towards the student?
If the teacher added little notes next to the grade using phrases such as
”a hapless and hopeless observer”? Yeah, a sure sign.
Quote:
If your child makes a mistake, is correction reflective of a negative attitude for the child?
Suppose it depends on how it’s done.
Quote:
And have you considered that if 90% of the Press is "against" him, maybe it's for an obvious reason: he is that terrible.
The obvious reason is, if you’re not part of the resistance, you’re not invited to the party, it’s almost cult like.
Quote:
The discussion about Sanders leaving does not have to be deep, and that is another clever way you guys avoid responding to topics.
You accuse me of something but don’t say what it is, and you’re using words like “you guys”.... I’m only one person, and while “clever” may be accurate, there’s nothing to avoid.
Quote:
So let me ask you directly, in keeping with the subject you have avoided to attack me: was she good or bad or just right as Press Secretary?
For what the White House/administration has been up against... I’d say she was just right. I found it admirable that she owned up to her mistakes.
Quote:
And have you considered that if 90% of the Press is "against" him, maybe it is for an obvious reason: he is that terrible.
Is this a talking point you’re trying to stress...