One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
At what point are we "beings?"
Page <<first <prev 19 of 21 next> last>>
May 24, 2019 07:19:38   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
To me, the essence of the mind is consciousness. Whether that consciousness can escape the physical brain or not, I have no idea. If it can, then I would call that spirit or soul; I don't really see anything different between the two, spirit or soul. If the mind cannot escape the physical brain, then I would say that the essence of the mind is within the inner workings of the physical brain.

So, now that I'm further confused . . .


I agree with you on the consciousness of the mind being spirit, and believe upon death the spirit (energy) leaves the body...
I’m not positive of it either but is what I think..The essence of the mind that guides us along with the heart which stimulates the life force..

Confused on this topic is just as many scientists are as well.. We’re human...lol

Reply
May 24, 2019 07:43:34   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
Is Blade's "authority" to express his religious beliefs and convictions in any way less than your "authority" to expound upon yours?

science - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
[Search domain www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/science] https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/science

quote:Science is an "empirical" field, that is, it develops a body of knowledge by observing things and performing experiments. The meticulous process of gathering and analyzing data is called the "scientific method," and we sometimes use science to describe the knowledge we already have."End quote


JW wrote:
Point 1: Not only is science the only road to knowledge, science is knowledge. It's what the word means.

Point 2: Sentience is the ability to perceive things or minimally to be able to feel things. If sentience goes by the second sense, to feel things, every living thing would be sentient and that renders the word meaningless. The Venus Fly Trap and other plants can feel things. Consequently, feeling things must mean in the sense of perception for it to have any actual meaning. I think it fair to say that knowledge is the only way to truth.

To perceive in the sense of a sentient creature requires minimally a central nervous system. A zygote doesn't have one. A foetus doesn't even have anything that begins to resemble a mammalian brain until the sixth month of gestation.

If it is your contention that a soul enters at the moment of conception, we are back at your religious beliefs again and I repeat my question; by what authority do you subject a nonsubscriber to your religious viewpoint.
Point 1: Not only is science the only road to know... (show quote)

Reply
May 24, 2019 07:49:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Morgan wrote:
That is my understanding, that souls can achieve a higher plateau of consciousness in divineness. I hate to think of people feeling that they have failed, mistakes are made yes, but that is exactly when we learn, grow and expand. I believe the Divine is not singular and sees us all as babes in the woods, such simpletons we are, LOL... even with our oh so great technology.


I have read the main purpose of reincarnation is to bring about the learned lessons needed to further divineness until reaching the absolute or that heavenly plateau...

Touching on what you said earlier, a choice to return brings with it a reason for that return and for the choice made...

Nothing is impossible when speaking in the realm of life, living, potential etc.. Nor should any of it be dismissed..

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2019 13:34:43   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
Morgan wrote:
That is what it comes down to, the religious pushing their viewpoint to how we all abide by. This is not a governmental issue, a very personal, morally individual issue. Using this issue for the government to decide is opening a Pandora's Box, though they don't see it.


Amen ... which is why we have had the principle of separation of church and state for two centuries, and it is now being violated in major ways.

Reply
May 24, 2019 13:39:04   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
Rose42 wrote:
Isn’t the opposite also true?

Science is like a religion to many. Its not the only path to knowledge. There are many things it can’t begin to explain and it bends with trends in society.

If it is bent by trends in society it is just pseudo-science and can't be trusted. Science is the gathering of facts and developing theories to explain those facts using logic. Knowledge is the accumulation of what are generally believed to be scientific facts. What you may be referring to is the term "wisdom", which is the ability to determine how those scientific facts can be used. A classic example is that we have the knowledge to develop a biological weapon that kills millions of people ... wisdom is whether to use it or not.

Reply
May 24, 2019 13:40:55   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
JW wrote:
Point 1: Not only is science the only road to knowledge, science is knowledge. It's what the word means.

Point 2: Sentience is the ability to perceive things or minimally to be able to feel things. If sentience goes by the second sense, to feel things, every living thing would be sentient and that renders the word meaningless. The Venus Fly Trap and other plants can feel things. Consequently, feeling things must mean in the sense of perception for it to have any actual meaning. I think it fair to say that knowledge is the only way to truth.

To perceive in the sense of a sentient creature requires minimally a central nervous system. A zygote doesn't have one. A foetus doesn't even have anything that begins to resemble a mammalian brain until the sixth month of gestation.

If it is your contention that a soul enters at the moment of conception, we are back at your religious beliefs again and I repeat my question; by what authority do you subject a nonsubscriber to your religious viewpoint.
Point 1: Not only is science the only road to know... (show quote)
Apparently science did nothing to help you with reading comprehension. I don't think anyone would accuse me of subjecting you to my religious viewpoint by simply asking some questions.

How do you know a growth inside a woman is insentient? Can you prove that? How do you know that the existence of a soul is unprovable? Just because science has not yet provided empirical evidence one way or the other, who's to say one day it won't?

It is not possible that science alone has taught us everything we know. Aesthetic experience, subjective experience, cathartic experience, observation, cognition, the school of hard knocks, trial and error are some of the paths to knowledge in which scientific methods do not apply.

Science cannot explain why ice is slick, but you can experience how slick it is. When you ride a bicycle, it stays upright, but science cannot explain why. You can see through a glass window, but science cannot explain why. Newtons laws of gravity did not teach us to walk or avoid jumping off of cliffs. Science cannot explain where an idea comes from, or dreams, or an epiphany, or the nature of consciousness and self-awareness.

The truth is that very little of the decisions we make, the choices we make or the actions we take are based on the application of scientific laws. Logic and reason apply to very few of our decisions or actions.

Reply
May 24, 2019 13:42:21   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
whitnebrat wrote:
If it is bent by trends in society it is just pseudo-science and can't be trusted. Science is the gathering of facts and developing theories to explain those facts using logic. Knowledge is the accumulation of what are generally believed to be scientific facts. What you may be referring to is the term "wisdom", which is the ability to determine how those scientific facts can be used. A classic example is that we have the knowledge to develop a biological weapon that kills millions of people ... wisdom is whether to use it or not.
If it is bent by trends in society it is just pseu... (show quote)


Those who will not see by choice.
May never see.
Oh well.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2019 13:44:27   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
lindajoy wrote:
I agree with you on the consciousness of the mind being spirit, and believe upon death the spirit (energy) leaves the body...
I’m not positive of it either but is what I think..The essence of the mind that guides us along with the heart which stimulates the life force..

Confused on this topic is just as many scientists are as well.. We’re human...lol
I agree with you on the consciousness of the mind ... (show quote)


I can't recall where I read it years ago, but an experiment was done on dying patients where they very accurately weighed the patient through the dying episode. At the moment of death, they detected a very slight loss of weight in the body, as if something had departed from the person. Like I said, it was years ago, and I can't recall the article. But I'm sure that one of our posters could find it.

Reply
May 24, 2019 13:49:26   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
lindajoy wrote:
I have read the main purpose of reincarnation is to bring about the learned lessons needed to further divineness until reaching the absolute or that heavenly plateau...

Touching on what you said earlier, a choice to return brings with it a reason for that return and for the choice made...

Nothing is impossible when speaking in the realm of life, living, potential etc.. Nor should any of it be dismissed..
I have read the main purpose of reincarnation is t... (show quote)

Buddhist teachings are replete with the idea of reincarnation. Each Dalai Lama is reputed to be the reincarnated spirit of the previous one, and the Tibetan Buddhists go to great lengths to assess candidates as having knowledge of which only the previous Dalai Lama could have known or had. It isn't limited to the priestly class, either ... the whole idea of karma is that it may come to fruition in a future lifetime, not necessarily this one. Many similarities here.

Reply
May 24, 2019 17:40:54   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
whitnebrat wrote:
I can't recall where I read it years ago, but an experiment was done on dying patients where they very accurately weighed the patient through the dying episode. At the moment of death, they detected a very slight loss of weight in the body, as if something had departed from the person. Like I said, it was years ago, and I can't recall the article. But I'm sure that one of our posters could find it.


Now I know I have read of this aa well and will see if something can be found.. It is all fascinating..

Reply
May 24, 2019 17:53:14   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
lindajoy wrote:
Now I know I have read of this aa well and will see if something can be found.. It is all fascinating..
The "21 grams" experiment was a failure. Basing his hypothesis on souls have weight, Duncan MacDougall, a Massachusetts physician conducted an experiment on six terminal patients in a nursing home.

One of the patients lost weight but then put the weight back on, and two of the other patients registered a loss of weight at death but a few minutes later lost even more weight. One of the patients lost "three-fourths of an ounce" (21.3 grams) in weight, coinciding with the time of death. MacDougall disregarded the results of another patient on the grounds the scales were "not finely adjusted", and discounted the results of another as the patient died while the equipment was still being calibrated. MacDougall reported that none of the dogs lost any weight after death.

While MacDougall believed that the results from his experiment showed the human soul might have weight, his report, which was not published until 1907, stated the experiment would have to be repeated many times before any conclusion could be obtained.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2019 18:51:30   #
JW
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Apparently science did nothing to help you with reading comprehension. I don't think anyone would accuse me of subjecting you to my religious viewpoint by simply asking some questions.

How do you know a growth inside a woman is insentient? Can you prove that? How do you know that the existence of a soul is unprovable? Just because science has not yet provided empirical evidence one way or the other, who's to say one day it won't?

It is not possible that science alone has taught us everything we know. Aesthetic experience, subjective experience, cathartic experience, observation, cognition, the school of hard knocks, trial and error are some of the paths to knowledge in which scientific methods do not apply.

Science cannot explain why ice is slick, but you can experience how slick it is. When you ride a bicycle, it stays upright, but science cannot explain why. You can see through a glass window, but science cannot explain why. Newtons laws of gravity did not teach us to walk or avoid jumping off of cliffs. Science cannot explain where an idea comes from, or dreams, or an epiphany, or the nature of consciousness and self-awareness.

The truth is that very little of the decisions we make, the choices we make or the actions we take are based on the application of scientific laws. Logic and reason apply to very few of our decisions or actions.
Apparently science did nothing to help you with re... (show quote)


OK, I'll type slower. S C I E N C E means knowledge. That is the meaning of the word.

Science etymology definition
Etymology 1. From Middle English science, scyence, borrowed from Old French science, escience, from Latin scientia (“knowledge”), from sciens, the present participle stem of scire (“to know”).

OK? You cannot KNOW a truth without knowledge.

Then next, I do not accuse you of anything. I have assumed from the posture of your argument that you oppose a woman's choice to abort an unwanted pregnancy. If I am incorrect, I apologize. If I am correct, then what I said still stands. Further, from your argument, the religious basis of your view cannot be separated from the points you make. Therefore, it follows that the overriding consideration in your view hinges on your religious outlook. So, it is evident that you are applying your religious standards to a nonsubscriber's life choices.


I have to assume it is not science you lack confidence in but in the ability to apply the scientific method to things you see as unproven or disadvantageous to your argument.

The scientific method can be applied to all instances of enquirey. Sometimes, there is insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion but the logic still applies. The scientific method only applies to inquirey. You may certainly experience a thing without applying the scientific method but if you choose to learn why your experience happened as it did, the scientific principle is the only approach that can lead to understanding.

I've already addressed the insentience issue so I'll say simply, without a functioning central nervous system, sentience, in the human sense is not possible.


As for your "science can't", you are incorrect in almost all of the examples you raise. I'll just address one of the physical instances. Ice is slick because it is water and a micro thin film of water appears as a result of the friction and pressure placed on the ice by things moving over it.

Finally, science knows what separates self awareness from consciousness and so does every person who has undergone surgery using a new class of anesthetic derived from the valium group of drugs... even if they don't realize they know it. The drugs shut off short term memory and while the patient remains 100% conscious, he has no awareness of himself or of what is happening to him.

Self awareness is a trick of short term memory. I can speak positively of the experience because I have applied scientific principles to researching how it occurs, how the anesthetic works and why doctors refer to the effect as short term amnesia. I experienced the effect first hand and was astounded to discover I could dress myself for going out in the winter as carry on a conversation with a nurse while having absolutely no awareness of myself, dressing or conversing with the nurse until the instant Self awareness returned, in the middle of the afore mentioned situation.

Reply
May 24, 2019 18:56:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
whitnebrat wrote:
I can't recall where I read it years ago, but an experiment was done on dying patients where they very accurately weighed the patient through the dying episode. At the moment of death, they detected a very slight loss of weight in the body, as if something had departed from the person. Like I said, it was years ago, and I can't recall the article. But I'm sure that one of our posters could find it.


Nope, didn't' happen. I saw the paper too. It was a joke, like saying that women have one less rib than men.

Reply
May 24, 2019 19:00:02   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
I have read the main purpose of reincarnation is to bring about the learned lessons needed to further divineness until reaching the absolute or that heavenly plateau...

Touching on what you said earlier, a choice to return brings with it a reason for that return and for the choice made...

Nothing is impossible when speaking in the realm of life, living, potential etc.. Nor should any of it be dismissed..
I have read the main purpose of reincarnation is t... (show quote)


Wouldn't it be very cool, though, if indeed, we got to review our live after we die, and decide to go back and work on something we need in ourselves, or to move forward to a greater realm?!! To, essentially, live another life from child to old man, never knowing that we actually chose that, and wondering about these very same things, even though we already had done that!!??

Reply
May 24, 2019 19:00:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Buddhist teachings are replete with the idea of reincarnation. Each Dalai Lama is reputed to be the reincarnated spirit of the previous one, and the Tibetan Buddhists go to great lengths to assess candidates as having knowledge of which only the previous Dalai Lama could have known or had. It isn't limited to the priestly class, either ... the whole idea of karma is that it may come to fruition in a future lifetime, not necessarily this one. Many similarities here.


The Golden Child!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 19 of 21 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.