fullspinzoo wrote:
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/16/abortion-advocates-losing-dont-give-them-lifeline/
They need some Clockwork Orange style therapy.
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/16/abortion-advocates-losing-dont-give-them-lifeline/
Abortion has evolved into a death cult. There will never be a perfect way to put the death genie back in the bottle. The fact that expanding abortion to include infanticide is CELEBRATED illustrates how radical, and rabid this death cult is.
Ricktloml wrote:
Abortion has evolved into a death cult. There will never be a perfect way to put the death genie back in the bottle. The fact that expanding abortion to include infanticide is CELEBRATED illustrates how radical, and rabid this death cult is.
Did The Canaanites Really Sacrifice Their Children?
The answer to this charge is obvious to Bible students. For the Bible paints a picture of Canaanite society dominated by a religious system that was both licentious and cruel. Canaanite gods demanded human sacrifice and more specifically, the sacrifice of children.
In the Bible book of Jeremiah , God states, “They built the high places of Baal in order to burn their sons in the fire as whole burnt offerings to Baal, something that I had not commanded or spoken of and that had never even come into my heart.” (Jeremiah 19:5) The Bible is clear that child sacrifice was a regular feature of the religion of the Canaanites and the surrounding nations. “…they do for their gods every detestable thing that Jehovah hates, even burning their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.” (Deuteronomy 12:31) Did the Canaanites really ritually burn their children? The revisionists say no. Any mention of Canaanite child sacrifice in the Bible is just propaganda to justify the subjection of Canaan. Recent scientific studies may have resolved the question.
According to the Bible, centers of worship for Canaanite gods such as Molech and the Baal’s were set up in Judah and Israel by apostate kings. Child sacrifice was even practiced in the Valley of Hinnom just outside of Jerusalem. Yet religious reformers such as King Josiah pulled down these places and rendered them unfit for use, “He also made unfit for worship Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Sons of Hinnom, so that no one could make his son or his daughter pass through the fire to Molech.” (2 Kings 23:10) So it is no surprise that these sites which Josiah sought to erase have not been positively identified. Other Canaanite places of worship in Israel that have been identified have not yet yielded evidence of child sacrifice.*(see footnote) Yet absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. There is good reason to believe the Bible did not exaggerate Canaanite barbarism.
Although Canaanite civilization was largely driven out of the land of Israel, it emigrated elsewhere, founding colonies along the Mediterranean coast of North Africa, where it thrived for centuries. Most notable among these was the colony of Carthage in modern-day Tunisia. That city-state became so powerful it at one time rivaled the Roman republic. Carthaginians spoke the Canaanite language and importantly, practiced Canaanite religion. They also seemed to have brought with them their cruel
predilection for child sacrifice
https://biblereadingarcheology.com/2016/05/13/did-the-canaanites-sacrifice-their-children/Bold type mine.
Looks like they’re back! God help us!
Think about it. There were no abortion mills at the time of Baal and Moloch worship. They were both sex cults and the unwanted babies were thrown into the flames to worship the so-called deities and also probably to get rid of unwanted babies.
So what are the abortion mills for, but 99% to get rid of unwanted babies?
One thing I find quite lacking on the part of the liberals is their understanding o f the roll of BIRTH CONTROL. Conservatives are all lumped together as opposing birth control. Yes, there are a few who do oppose it's use, but I see nothing wrong in preventing conception. In fact, the vast majority of Christians support its use. I see a LOT wrong with snuffing out an innocent life by most methods of abortion, most of which entail agonizing pain for that poor baby. There have been in utero videos made by doctors performing abortions clearly showing the baby moving away from the needles and suction devices inserted to kill them. I also support and advocate sterilization of women who have already had abortions and/or on various welfare programs. That would stop a lot of this nonsense.
It's not abortion being advocated, it's the freedom to choose
"freedom to choose" is just a cheap way to skirt around what is actually being done to live HUMAN BEINGS, before or after birth. Why don't you advocate effective birth control? Or better yet, SELF control? I'm sure my hormones rage as ardently as anyone else's, but I always knew what the consequences of my behavior were and I acted accordingly. As a result, I've never had an unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted disease or been embarrassed when I ran into other men I'd dated when with another gentleman, It does not appear SELF control or RESPONSIBILITY are advocated very much on the part of the "freedom to choosers".
woodguru wrote:
It's not abortion being advocated, it's the freedom to choose
Freedom to choose "murder" is not a choice, period.
woodguru wrote:
It's not abortion being advocated, it's the freedom to choose
And BTW, anti-abortionists aren't all Christians. Some are even . . can I say it? . .. atheists and deists and from many other backgrounds, including g Muslim and Jewish. I know of no human fetus that ever developed into anything other than a human being.
Iliamna1 wrote:
So what are the abortion mills for, but 99% to get rid of unwanted babies?
One thing I find quite lacking on the part of the liberals is their understanding o f the roll of BIRTH CONTROL. Conservatives are all lumped together as opposing birth control. Yes, there are a few who do oppose it's use, but I see nothing wrong in preventing conception. In fact, the vast majority of Christians support its use. I see a LOT wrong with snuffing out an innocent life by most methods of abortion, most of which entail agonizing pain for that poor baby. There have been in utero videos made by doctors performing abortions clearly showing the baby moving away from the needles and suction devices inserted to kill them. I also support and advocate sterilization of women who have already had abortions and/or on various welfare programs. That would stop a lot of this nonsense.
So what are the abortion mills for, but 99% to get... (
show quote)
I think a woman who decides to kill her unborn baby should be required to make a fully informed decision. She should have to watch what an abortion does to her baby. Then if she can still be that savage, barbaric, uncivilized and cruel, she should be sterilized.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.