One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Researchers have found strong evidence that racism helps the GOP win
Page <<first <prev 10 of 12 next> last>>
May 21, 2019 11:40:50   #
Seth
 
byronglimish wrote:
You have thoroughly proven yourself deranged.


Not necessarily: first you'd have to establish that he (or she) was ever "ranged" to begin with. Chances are good that this one has always been like this.

Reply
May 21, 2019 11:49:59   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
Seth wrote:
Not necessarily: first you'd have to establish that he (or she) was ever "ranged" to begin with. Chances are good that this one has always been like this.


Born to be nuts?

Reply
May 21, 2019 11:57:59   #
Seth
 
America 1 wrote:
Born to be nuts?


Or hatched. 😁

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2019 12:51:18   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Seth wrote:
Not necessarily: first you'd have to establish that he (or she) was ever "ranged" to begin with. Chances are good that this one has always been like this.


Yes,...i see your point.

Reply
May 21, 2019 15:46:17   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
son of witless wrote:
I am one of the people who do answer questions on OPP. If you will restate your question I will give you my best answer. The ball is in your court. Put up or shut up.


I have stated it plenty of times, point out where I have SUPPORTED socialism.

Reply
May 21, 2019 18:38:57   #
son of witless
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I have stated it plenty of times, point out where I have SUPPORTED socialism.



I already answered you. You attacked me when I equated Socialism with calling anyone who was against it to be a racist. To me that was defending Socialism and attacking one it's attackers, me. But it is not all about me. You also ran your big mouth with this statement. "
True, but during the 60's the Democratic party turned into the party of progression and decided to embrace inclusiveness and that is when the south bailed the Democratic party and allowed the Democratic party's new found inclusivity to flourish. Now the party of racism and resentment IS the Republican party. "

There you made false accusations of racism against the Republican Party which is the chief opponent of SOCIALISM in America. Then you defend the Democratic Party which is the strongest supporter of SOCIALISM in America. While you are at it you use the word " progression " . That means to move from one state to another. Kinda the way the Village Idiot Obama liked to use the word " change ". Without context it is a meaningless word. I can only hazard to guess that you meant Progressivism, which goes hand in had with SOCIALISM.

You can disguise your meanings and lie to yourself that you do not favor SOCIALISM, but I can rip your fantasies apart, with little effort. Very little effort.

Reply
May 21, 2019 19:20:02   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
son of witless wrote:
I already answered you. You attacked me when I equated Socialism with calling anyone who was against it to be a racist. To me that was defending Socialism and attacking one it's attackers, me. But it is not all about me. You also ran your big mouth with this statement. "
True, but during the 60's the Democratic party turned into the party of progression and decided to embrace inclusiveness and that is when the south bailed the Democratic party and allowed the Democratic party's new found inclusivity to flourish. Now the party of racism and resentment IS the Republican party. "

There you made false accusations of racism against the Republican Party which is the chief opponent of SOCIALISM in America. Then you defend the Democratic Party which is the strongest supporter of SOCIALISM in America. While you are at it you use the word " progression " . That means to move from one state to another. Kinda the way the Village Idiot Obama liked to use the word " change ". Without context it is a meaningless word. I can only hazard to guess that you meant Progressivism, which goes hand in had with SOCIALISM.

You can disguise your meanings and lie to yourself that you do not favor SOCIALISM, but I can rip your fantasies apart, with little effort. Very little effort.
I already answered you. You attacked me when I equ... (show quote)


That is NOT supporting socialism, it is correcting ignorance. As for any support I have shown to Democrats, I am allowed to stand up for the truth WITHOUT actually being a member of or even supporting a party. Of course I couldn't expect you to know this, any time a true Republican shows any backbone and integrity, they get accused of being a "rino" by you and your ilk. By all means, continue with you ill conceived prejudices, it is you and your kind that will destroy the Republican party. Hopefully after that destruction, it can rebuild WITHOUT the likes of you and your kind and be the better for it.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2019 20:05:39   #
son of witless
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
That is NOT supporting socialism, it is correcting ignorance. As for any support I have shown to Democrats, I am allowed to stand up for the truth WITHOUT actually being a member of or even supporting a party. Of course I couldn't expect you to know this, any time a true Republican shows any backbone and integrity, they get accused of being a "rino" by you and your ilk. By all means, continue with you ill conceived prejudices, it is you and your kind that will destroy the Republican party. Hopefully after that destruction, it can rebuild WITHOUT the likes of you and your kind and be the better for it.
That is NOT supporting socialism, it is correcting... (show quote)


The originator of this topic said " I had hoped that the racism that prevailed throughout this country had faded but with the election of Barack Obama and then Donald Trump it's clear that the racism that so defined this country is alive and well and lives in the Republican Party..."

I then sarcastically responded that to be against Socialism was to be a racist. You then strongly attacked me. You are now claiming that your attack was not because you favor Socialism or even favor the Democrats. It was merely because you are a non political lover of truth. Do I have that right ?

Reply
May 21, 2019 20:05:43   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
That is NOT supporting socialism, it is correcting ignorance. As for any support I have shown to Democrats, I am allowed to stand up for the truth WITHOUT actually being a member of or even supporting a party. Of course I couldn't expect you to know this, any time a true Republican shows any backbone and integrity, they get accused of being a "rino" by you and your ilk. By all means, continue with you ill conceived prejudices, it is you and your kind that will destroy the Republican party. Hopefully after that destruction, it can rebuild WITHOUT the likes of you and your kind and be the better for it.
That is NOT supporting socialism, it is correcting... (show quote)


Pretty much wraps up who and what you are.

Reply
May 21, 2019 22:31:17   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
son of witless wrote:
The originator of this topic said " I had hoped that the racism that prevailed throughout this country had faded but with the election of Barack Obama and then Donald Trump it's clear that the racism that so defined this country is alive and well and lives in the Republican Party..."

I then sarcastically responded that to be against Socialism was to be a racist. You then strongly attacked me. You are now claiming that your attack was not because you favor Socialism or even favor the Democrats. It was merely because you are a non political lover of truth. Do I have that right ?
The originator of this topic said " I had hop... (show quote)


Never said I was non-political nor political, just that I do not back any one party. I see some positive aspects of the Democratic party, I see some positive aspects of the Republican party (right now, not so much), I even see some positive aspects of the Libertarian party, I am not happy with the Independent party as they have robbed me of an easy way to identify my political leanings, calling myself an independent, I can't do that any more and I am not happy about that so I have issues with the Independent party right now. Other than that, I think you are finally seeing the light in regards to me, I hope.

Reply
May 21, 2019 23:02:39   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Never said I was non-political nor political, just that I do not back any one party. I see some positive aspects of the Democratic party, I see some positive aspects of the Republican party (right now, not so much), I even see some positive aspects of the Libertarian party, I am not happy with the Independent party as they have robbed me of an easy way to identify my political leanings, calling myself an independent, I can't do that any more and I am not happy about that so I have issues with the Independent party right now. Other than that, I think you are finally seeing the light in regards to me, I hope.
Never said I was non-political nor political, just... (show quote)


Please let us endorse you and your every word as important.

Everyone is anxiously waiting for your self aggrandizing book, "It's All About Me, Me, Me, Me!" Can I get a signed copy, if so, use your red crayon.Thanx, you're the most!

Reply
 
 
May 22, 2019 20:10:48   #
son of witless
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Never said I was non-political nor political, just that I do not back any one party. I see some positive aspects of the Democratic party, I see some positive aspects of the Republican party (right now, not so much), I even see some positive aspects of the Libertarian party, I am not happy with the Independent party as they have robbed me of an easy way to identify my political leanings, calling myself an independent, I can't do that any more and I am not happy about that so I have issues with the Independent party right now. Other than that, I think you are finally seeing the light in regards to me, I hope.
Never said I was non-political nor political, just... (show quote)


You have spent an awful lot of time telling what you are not. I know it is just me, but I judge people by their behavior. You attacking me for my sarcasm on Socialism gave me the false implication, apparently, that you were defending Socialism. Then your other opinions confirmed my false impression that you were a hardcore Liberal Democrat.

Now I know all of this is false because you have told that. So once again I know what you are not. What you actually are, continues to escape me. I am not seeing the light of you.

I realize that it is not your communication skills that are at fault. It is me. I am locked in on 6 decades of judging books by their covers.

Reply
May 22, 2019 20:42:20   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
son of witless wrote:
You have spent an awful lot of time telling what you are not. I know it is just me, but I judge people by their behavior. You attacking me for my sarcasm on Socialism gave me the false implication, apparently, that you were defending Socialism. Then your other opinions confirmed my false impression that you were a hardcore Liberal Democrat.

Now I know all of this is false because you have told that. So once again I know what you are not. What you actually are, continues to escape me. I am not seeing the light of you.

I realize that it is not your communication skills that are at fault. It is me. I am locked in on 6 decades of judging books by their covers.
You have spent an awful lot of time telling what y... (show quote)


I have said it before, I am more of a centrist without a party, no current party quite suits me so... You have likely confused my distaste for Trump and the majority of his supporters for partisan leanings.

Reply
May 22, 2019 20:45:00   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I have said it before, I am more of a centrist without a party, no current party quite suits me so... You have likely confused my distaste for Trump and the majority of his supporters for partisan leanings.


It's probably not much different from the majority of Trump supporters' distaste for you.

Reply
May 22, 2019 23:00:25   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I have said it before, I am more of a centrist without a party, no current party quite suits me so... You have likely confused my distaste for Trump and the majority of his supporters for partisan leanings.


It's a joke how you hard core Obama proselytes claim centrist.

You are absolutely a insanely progressive leftist!

No volume of Bullbiden can conceal that fact.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.