One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Loses Rule Of Law Yet Again... Court Says Congress Can Have Financial Records
Page 1 of 21 next> last>>
May 20, 2019 18:05:11   #
woodguru
 
https://dmlnewsapp.com/breaking-judge-upholds-dem-subpoena-trump-financial-records/

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:07:37   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
woodguru wrote:
https://dmlnewsapp.com/breaking-judge-upholds-dem-subpoena-trump-financial-records/


So its not over...President will take it all the way to the Supreme Court...Maybe he lost a battle, but he will win the war!!

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:09:27   #
Liberty Tree
 
woodguru wrote:
https://dmlnewsapp.com/breaking-judge-upholds-dem-subpoena-trump-financial-records/


An Obama appointee, no surprise.

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2019 18:10:28   #
Kevyn
 
proud republican wrote:
So its not over...President will take it all the way to the Supreme Court...Maybe he lost a battle, but he will win the war!!


It will be a true tragedy for the republic if he is able to stack the courts and unqualified ideologues he appointed hold him above the law.

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:13:19   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Kevyn wrote:
It will be a true tragedy for the republic if he is able to stack the courts and unqualified ideologues he appointed hold him above the law.


Why are they unqualified???Because they are Republicans???..I can say the same thing about your dumb DumboRats that are sitting in the Supreme Court and whose time come to retire...

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:18:38   #
woodguru
 
proud republican wrote:
So its not over...President will take it all the way to the Supreme Court...Maybe he lost a battle, but he will win the war!!


Do you understand the rule of law that is being upheld by the courts? You act like every conflict Trump gets into is based on pure partisanship bias. He is wrong and on the wrong side of the rule of law in every case he is refusing to provide documentation or testimony asked for. This isn't the civilian version of the law and courts being blocked up by any stupid premise his attorneys want to float, he is up against the country and the rule of law...the constitution.

There are certain hard cold laws he is violating that the supreme court is going to shoot him down on, there is a point to how far they will go to "side" with him.

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:20:06   #
Carol Kelly
 
woodguru wrote:
https://dmlnewsapp.com/breaking-judge-upholds-dem-subpoena-trump-financial-records/


For 10 years. He’s only been in office for two years. If they get by with this, we can all be in danger of exploitation. The Democrats have punched their ticket too far ‘‘tis time. What his income tax looked like 8 years before he became Presidentis not their business. I’m despising the Socialist Democrats and RINOs more everyday. They are showing their ignorance and strong desire to destroy our country. Stop this nonsense now!!!

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2019 18:22:27   #
woodguru
 
https://thehill.com/regulation/444638-judge-upholds-house-panel-subpoena-for-trump-financial-records?userid=178778

Try to use your brains and figure out if perhaps Trump is being unlawful when he refuses to comply with subpoenas.

When he tells McGahn to refuse to testify he is obstructing lawful investigations.

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:25:03   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
woodguru wrote:
https://thehill.com/regulation/444638-judge-upholds-house-panel-subpoena-for-trump-financial-records?userid=178778

Try to use your brains and figure out if perhaps Trump is being unlawful when he refuses to comply with subpoenas.

When he tells McGahn to refuse to testify he is obstructing lawful investigations.


If he didnt win Presidency,would you ask for his records for 10 yrs?? ..NO!!!.You people dont give a damn about rule of law!!!!!......Its all about payback for your Killery losing her bit for presidency..Has nothing to do with rule of law!!!

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:34:15   #
son of witless
 
Kevyn wrote:
It will be a true tragedy for the republic if he is able to stack the courts and unqualified ideologues he appointed hold him above the law.


We can only hope that he continues to fill the courts with judges who can read and write, as opposed to the many Constitutionally impaired Judges Obama stacked.

Reply
May 20, 2019 18:55:57   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-judge-sides-with-house-democrats-over-subpoena-for-trumps-financial-records/ar-AABE1wa?ocid=spartandhp

Fox News' Bill Mears, Edward Lawrence, Brooke Singman, and Kristin Brown contributed to this report.

A Washington, D.C.-based federal judge has sided with House Oversight Committee Democrats seeking to enforce their subpoena of Trump accounting firm Mazars USA, in a major ruling that breathes new life into Democrats' ongoing efforts to probe the president's financial dealings.

The subpoena seeks access to a slew of Trump financial documents dating back to 2011. Democrats pursued the subpoena after former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress that the president routinely and improperly altered financial statements.

Barack Obama-appointed judge Amit P. Mehta's 41-page opinion began by comparing President Trump's concerns over congressional overreach to those of President James Buchanan, asserting that Trump "has taken up the fight of his predecessor."

And Mehta acknowledged that he was "well aware that this case involves records concerning the private and business affairs of the President of the United States."

But, Mehta said, Democrats' subpoena fell within well-established congressional investigative powers. He said he would not stay his ruling pending appeal.

“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct—past or present—even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," Mehta wrote.

The president’s legal team, in a filing earlier this month, had asked the judge to prohibit Mazars from “enforcing or complying” with the subpoena, issued April 15.

Trump's lawyers had argued the subpoena to Mazars “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose,” and is an “unconstitutional attempt to exercise ‘the powers of law enforcement.’”

Trump’s lawyers also noted that the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., is leading several Trump-focused investigations.
.
“Chairman Cummings flat-out admitted that he wanted to ‘investigate whether the President may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his tenure in office’ and ‘review whether he has accurately reported his finances to the Office of Government Ethics and other federal entities,’” Trump’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The Trump team filing came after Cummings’ committee issued several subpoenas for Mazars Accounting in an effort to obtain financial documents and audits prepared for Trump and his businesses over the last decade. Cummings also sought independent auditor’s reports, annual statements and other documents related to Trump’s finances spanning from 2011 to 2018.

At the time, Mazars said it “will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations.”

Reply
 
 
May 20, 2019 19:23:45   #
Lonewolf
 
proud republican wrote:
If he didnt win Presidency,would you ask for his records for 10 yrs?? ..NO!!!.You people dont give a damn about rule of law!!!!!......Its all about payback for your Killery losing her bit for presidency..Has nothing to do with rule of law!!!


Sooner or later as he has been suspected of money laundering for a long time we will be hearing more about that soon that's why he hides his taxes

Reply
May 20, 2019 19:38:03   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-judge-sides-with-house-democrats-over-subpoena-for-trumps-financial-records/ar-AABE1wa?ocid=spartandhp

Fox News' Bill Mears, Edward Lawrence, Brooke Singman, and Kristin Brown contributed to this report.

A Washington, D.C.-based federal judge has sided with House Oversight Committee Democrats seeking to enforce their subpoena of Trump accounting firm Mazars USA, in a major ruling that breathes new life into Democrats' ongoing efforts to probe the president's financial dealings.

The subpoena seeks access to a slew of Trump financial documents dating back to 2011. Democrats pursued the subpoena after former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress that the president routinely and improperly altered financial statements.

Barack Obama-appointed judge Amit P. Mehta's 41-page opinion began by comparing President Trump's concerns over congressional overreach to those of President James Buchanan, asserting that Trump "has taken up the fight of his predecessor."

And Mehta acknowledged that he was "well aware that this case involves records concerning the private and business affairs of the President of the United States."

But, Mehta said, Democrats' subpoena fell within well-established congressional investigative powers. He said he would not stay his ruling pending appeal.

“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct—past or present—even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," Mehta wrote.

The president’s legal team, in a filing earlier this month, had asked the judge to prohibit Mazars from “enforcing or complying” with the subpoena, issued April 15.

Trump's lawyers had argued the subpoena to Mazars “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose,” and is an “unconstitutional attempt to exercise ‘the powers of law enforcement.’”

Trump’s lawyers also noted that the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., is leading several Trump-focused investigations.
.
“Chairman Cummings flat-out admitted that he wanted to ‘investigate whether the President may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his tenure in office’ and ‘review whether he has accurately reported his finances to the Office of Government Ethics and other federal entities,’” Trump’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The Trump team filing came after Cummings’ committee issued several subpoenas for Mazars Accounting in an effort to obtain financial documents and audits prepared for Trump and his businesses over the last decade. Cummings also sought independent auditor’s reports, annual statements and other documents related to Trump’s finances spanning from 2011 to 2018.

At the time, Mazars said it “will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-ju... (show quote)


This is setting a really bad precedent for our country. The coin always flips, and the left is setting the precedent for it to become them.

Reply
May 20, 2019 19:57:09   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
This is setting a really bad precedent for our country. The coin always flips, and the left is setting the precedent for it to become them.

You may be right, as precedents are routinely being set. But, in this case, the Republicans used the same 1924 law in question to call out the Obama Administration's alleged abuse of the IRS.

Back in 2013, Republicans thought the Internal Revenue Service under President Barack Obama was mistreating conservative groups that wanted to be recognized as tax-exempt nonprofits. So they asked the IRS to hand over tax information for conservative groups such as Crossroads GPS as well as a few liberal groups such as Priorities USA.

Congress has the power to ask for copies of anyone’s tax return thanks to a 1924 law enacted as a check on corruption in the executive branch. The 1924 law gives congressional committees that set tax policy the power to examine tax returns. It was used in 1974 when Congress looked at President Richard Nixon's returns, and in 2014 when the Ways and Means Committee released confidential tax information as part of its investigation into the Internal Revenue Service's handling of applications for nonprofit status.

Reply
May 20, 2019 20:06:50   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
You may be right, as precedents are routinely being set. But, in this case, the Republicans used the same 1924 law in question to call out the Obama Administration's alleged abuse of the IRS.


I don't believe it was "alleged", but was obstructed.
Anywhoo...If I were Trump, I would send any, and everyone they demand to, and tell them to plead the 5th. Works every time, right?

Reply
Page 1 of 21 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.