One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Checkout what this bitch did.
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
May 17, 2019 20:57:48   #
Richard Rowland
 
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail? One usually has to post ten percent of the amount of bail set. I wonder where she got the ten thousand? Actually, I'll bet she never had to post anything. That's what they do with these losers now, let 'em walk without posting anything.

I wonder why this isn't being considered a hate crime. If someone white has done this to an old black guy the press would be howling from the rooftops. And bail? Forget it!

https://www.facebook.com/leland.shellhause/posts/1488000574670381?comment_id=1488256917978080&notif_id=15580998891324i53&notf_t=feed

Reply
May 17, 2019 22:18:05   #
debeda
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail? One usually has to post ten percent of the amount of bail set. I wonder where she got the ten thousand? Actually, I'll bet she never had to post anything. That's what they do with these losers now, let 'em walk without posting anything.

I wonder why this isn't being considered a hate crime. If someone white has done this to an old black guy the press would be howling from the rooftops. And bail? Forget it!

https://www.facebook.com/leland.shellhause/posts/1488000574670381?comment_id=1488256917978080&notif_id=15580998891324i53&notf_t=feed
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail?... (show quote)


Just another example of the hypocrisy and lawlessness of the social justice morons that have infiltrated our country.

Reply
May 17, 2019 22:23:21   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail? One usually has to post ten percent of the amount of bail set. I wonder where she got the ten thousand? Actually, I'll bet she never had to post anything. That's what they do with these losers now, let 'em walk without posting anything.

I wonder why this isn't being considered a hate crime. If someone white has done this to an old black guy the press would be howling from the rooftops. And bail? Forget it!

https://www.facebook.com/leland.shellhause/posts/1488000574670381?comment_id=1488256917978080&notif_id=15580998891324i53&notf_t=feed
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail?... (show quote)


Absolutely no actual information related to the case in that link and all too many may not know how to find the link to the actual story so I shall post a better link for you.

https://news3lv.com/news/local/youve-seen-the-video-community-da-upset-bus-pushing-murder-suspect-was-granted-bail?fbclid=IwAR16CaJTIlujEv1IEEpesoqrmyo8DIlnHxTUjsIBXFy1NWN0lrzN8m6C8yg


I love how they try to invoke stronger feelings of outrage by labeling his pull behind cart as a walker. The item that he had with him that you see in the picture is no walker, it is one of those carts some people both young and old use to cart their purchases home from the store when they shop via public transit or walking to and from the store. Of course walker or cart doesn't change the fact that what she did was absolutely wrong.

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2019 22:34:43   #
Carol Kelly
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail? One usually has to post ten percent of the amount of bail set. I wonder where she got the ten thousand? Actually, I'll bet she never had to post anything. That's what they do with these losers now, let 'em walk without posting anything.

I wonder why this isn't being considered a hate crime. If someone white has done this to an old black guy the press would be howling from the rooftops. And bail? Forget it!

https://www.facebook.com/leland.shellhause/posts/1488000574670381?comment_id=1488256917978080&notif_id=15580998891324i53&notf_t=feed
This loser killed this old guy, and she gets bail?... (show quote)


I must agree on this. It’s a double standard that we have here.

Reply
May 17, 2019 22:40:42   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Absolutely no actual information related to the case in that link and all too many may not know how to find the link to the actual story so I shall post a better link for you.

https://news3lv.com/news/local/youve-seen-the-video-community-da-upset-bus-pushing-murder-suspect-was-granted-bail?fbclid=IwAR16CaJTIlujEv1IEEpesoqrmyo8DIlnHxTUjsIBXFy1NWN0lrzN8m6C8yg


I love how they try to invoke stronger feelings of outrage by labeling his pull behind cart as a walker. The item that he had with him that you see in the picture is no walker, it is one of those carts some people both young and old use to cart their purchases home from the store when they shop via public transit or walking to and from the store. Of course walker or cart doesn't change the fact that what she did was absolutely wrong.
Absolutely no actual information related to the ca... (show quote)


I love how you justify the murder of this man because someone misidentified a shopping cart as a walker.

Reply
May 17, 2019 22:58:42   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I love how you justify the murder of this man because someone misidentified a shopping cart as a walker.


Chuckle..... That was good...

Reply
May 17, 2019 23:10:01   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I love how you justify the murder of this man because someone misidentified a shopping cart as a walker.


I love how you ignorantly claim that I justify what she did at all. I guess we can't all be capable of comprehending simple English can we?

I wrote:
I love how they try to invoke stronger feelings of outrage by labeling his pull behind cart as a walker. The item that he had with him that you see in the picture is no walker, it is one of those carts some people both young and old use to cart their purchases home from the store when they shop via public transit or walking to and from the store. Of course walker or cart doesn't change the fact that what she did was absolutely wrong.


Above is EXACTLY what I said in regards to the case, care to tell me where I "justify" what she did?

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2019 23:11:05   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Chuckle..... That was good...


It was moronic actually. I don't suppose you would care to show me where I "justified" her actions, would you?

Reply
May 17, 2019 23:28:40   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I love how you ignorantly claim that I justify what she did at all. I guess we can't all be capable of comprehending simple English can we?


I will match PHDs with you if you wish. I think your comment was quite clear, "I love how they try to invoke stronger feelings of outrage" for this elderly man who was killed because they misidentified the apparatus he was pulling/pushing/leaning on. Ego, you minimized the deliberate murder of this man.

Reply
May 17, 2019 23:44:42   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I will match PHDs with you if you wish. I think your comment was quite clear, "I love how they try to invoke stronger feelings of outrage" for this elderly man who was killed because they misidentified the apparatus he was pulling/pushing/leaning on. Ego, you minimized the deliberate murder of this man.


Obviously you didn't bother reading "Of course walker or cart doesn't change the fact that what she did was absolutely wrong."

As for "murder", I really doubt her intent was to kill, involuntary manslaughter by all means, man slaughter, why not? Reckless endangerment resulting in death, certainly but murder? You are reaching there.

Reply
May 18, 2019 00:39:55   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Obviously you didn't bother reading "Of course walker or cart doesn't change the fact that what she did was absolutely wrong."

As for "murder", I really doubt her intent was to kill, involuntary manslaughter by all means, man slaughter, why not? Reckless endangerment resulting in death, certainly but murder? You are reaching there.


To be truthful, I was angered by your comment and gave little if any thought to your closing remarks.

Murder is the correct legal term for what Bishop did, it falls under "Grievous-bodily-harm murder" - Killing someone in an attack intended to cause them grievous bodily harm. For example, if the defendant fatally stabbed the victim, even if the defendant only intended to wound the victim, the defendant would still be liable for murder. In Nevada where the murder occurred, she was arrested and charged with First-degree murder. In Nevada, First Degree Murder comprises any premeditated act of killing. Examples include purposely shooting, stabbing, strangling, poisoning, torturing, or beating someone to death. Second Degree Murder, also known as Involuntary manslaughter under Nevada law is homicide committed without an intent to kill. Also called "negligent homicide," involuntary manslaughter occurs when a person unintentionally kills someone in the commission of either:an unlawful act (such as hunting without a license), or a negligent act (such as leaving a cocked-and-locked handgun where others can access it).

Perhaps her actions could be bargained to this level, but unlikely. The video is clear, she intentionally placed both hands on the elderly man's back and shoved him. Reckless endangerment in Nevada law, had the man lived, would be appropriate due to the specific wording of the law "As long as no one sustained substantial bodily harm or got killed from the alleged offense." But, Serge Fournier died from the injuries suffered at the hands of Cadesha Bishop. On scene police report says that Mr. Fournier landed EIGHT (8) FEET from the bus. That would require a mighty push. Also taken into consideration is her arrest record, Bishop has been convicted twice of misdemeanor domestic battery charges in 2014 and 2015, according to court records. This should carry weight in court.

So, bottom-line, in the state of Nevada..... killing someone (intentionally or not) is considered murder.

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2019 01:36:16   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Pennylynn wrote:
To be truthful, I was angered by your comment and gave little if any thought to your closing remarks.

Murder is the correct legal term for what Bishop did, it falls under "Grievous-bodily-harm murder" - Killing someone in an attack intended to cause them grievous bodily harm. For example, if the defendant fatally stabbed the victim, even if the defendant only intended to wound the victim, the defendant would still be liable for murder. In Nevada where the murder occurred, she was arrested and charged with First-degree murder. In Nevada, First Degree Murder comprises any premeditated act of killing. Examples include purposely shooting, stabbing, strangling, poisoning, torturing, or beating someone to death. Second Degree Murder, also known as Involuntary manslaughter under Nevada law is homicide committed without an intent to kill. Also called "negligent homicide," involuntary manslaughter occurs when a person unintentionally kills someone in the commission of either:an unlawful act (such as hunting without a license), or a negligent act (such as leaving a cocked-and-locked handgun where others can access it).

Perhaps her actions could be bargained to this level, but unlikely. The video is clear, she intentionally placed both hands on the elderly man's back and shoved him. Reckless endangerment in Nevada law, had the man lived, would be appropriate due to the specific wording of the law "As long as no one sustained substantial bodily harm or got killed from the alleged offense." But, Serge Fournier died from the injuries suffered at the hands of Cadesha Bishop. On scene police report says that Mr. Fournier landed EIGHT (8) FEET from the bus. That would require a mighty push. Also taken into consideration is her arrest record, Bishop has been convicted twice of misdemeanor domestic battery charges in 2014 and 2015, according to court records. This should carry weight in court.

So, bottom-line, in the state of Nevada..... killing someone (intentionally or not) is considered murder.
To be truthful, I was angered by your comment and ... (show quote)


I say let's wait and see what charges she goes to trial on.

Reply
May 18, 2019 01:44:24   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
I say let's wait and see what charges she goes to trial on.


She is due to hear her charges on 21 May. I hope she gets someone other than Judge Hua.

Reply
May 18, 2019 01:48:13   #
Common_Sense_Matters
 
Pennylynn wrote:
She is due to hear her charges on 21 May. I hope she gets someone other than Judge Hua.


What? Is he too lenient?




Edit: I see, she set the bail amount.

Reply
May 18, 2019 02:24:22   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
What? Is he too lenient?




Edit: I see, she set the bail amount.


Not one lawyer that I know thinks that the bail was right, and I know quite a few lawyers. In fact, the Bishop case was the after dinner topic last evening.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.