ExperienceCounts wrote:
I am against the “Equality Act”
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5/texthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/788The Democrats are for these bills called the “ Equality Act.”
Don’t be fooled these bills will trampled the rights of women, children, and Christians’ equal protection under the law, by advocating criminal penalties for those who even disagree with an alternative lifestyle for even saying so.
Biological males can identify as females and enter any bathroom, shower, locker room with impunity. It will become actionable to be for traditional marriage and against the leftist’s agendas. Free speech will be dead. Questioning the new Democratic platform has already resulted in name calling of Christians and conservatives and advocating hateful actions against them by our own elected officials.
Businesses and churches cannot abstain from allowing said individuals access to women’s crisis centers, women’s sports.I can see the possibility of loans and grants meant for women going to these individuals identifying as “women.” Doctors who disagree with the gender surgery insanity will be losing their jobs. Christian businesses will close, their owners designated as criminals. It is already happening in other countries. Christians will meet in secret: after all, they are criminal, radical, and seditious.
Ever wonder how many will transition back to being men after goals are accomplished? After all, “gender identity” is fluid while sex DNA is not!
I am against the “Equality Act” br br
https://www... (
show quote)
Sex DNA is in fact very fluid in transsexual people. And they have a long history of being abused by people not familiar with the situation. Protecting the rights of all Americans and ensuring their equality is a great goal. Below is part of the Wikipedia page explaining the non specific sex of hundreds of thousands of people who are discriminated against because of how they were born.
Intersex people are individuals born with any of several variations in sex characteristics including chromosomes, gonads, sex hormones, or genitals that, according to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, "do not fit the typical definitions for male or female bodies".[1][2] Such variations may involve genital ambiguity, and combinations of chromosomal genotype and sexual phenotype other than XY-male and XX-female.[3][4]
Intersex people were previously referred to as hermaphrodites or "congenital eunuchs".[5][6] In 19th and 20th century medical literature, intersex was referred as true hermaphroditism, female pseudohermaphroditism, and male pseudohermaphroditism reflecting the first taxonomic efforts to classify intersex conditions.[7] These terms are no longer used: terms including the word "hermaphrodite" are considered to be misleading, stigmatizing, and scientifically specious.[8] A hermaphrodite is now defined as "an animal or plant having both male and female reproductive organs"[7] In 1917, Richard Goldschmidt created the term "intersexuality" to describe a variety of physical sex ambiguities.[7] In clinical settings, the term “disorders of sex development” (DSD) has been used since 2006.[9] This shift has been controversial since the label was introduced.[10][11][12]
Intersex people face stigmatization and discrimination from birth or discovery of an intersex trait such as from puberty. This may include infanticide, abandonment and the stigmatization of families.[13][14][15] Globally, some intersex infants and children, such as those with ambiguous outer genitalia, are surgically or hormonally altered to create more socially acceptable sex characteristics. However, this is considered controversial, with no firm evidence of good outcomes.[16] Such treatments may involve sterilization. Adults, including elite female athletes, have also been subjects of such treatment.[17][18] Increasingly these issues are considered human rights abuses, with statements from international[19][20] and national human rights and ethics institutions.[21][22] Intersex organizations have also issued statements about human rights violations, including the Malta declaration of the third International Intersex Forum.[23]
In 2011, Christiane Völling became the first intersex person known to have successfully sued for damages in a case brought for non-consensual surgical intervention.[24] In April 2015, Malta became the first country to outlaw non-consensual medical interventions to modify sex anatomy, including that of intersex people.[25][26]
Some intersex persons may be assigned and raised as a girl or boy but then identify with another gender later in life, while most continue to identify with their assigned sex.