One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is Obama a traitor?????...
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Apr 24, 2019 18:20:18   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
proud republican wrote:
Yes and he will send more of military because now we are dealing with armed Human Traffickers who are using AK 47...You bet he will send military to help our Border Agents!!1



what the heck does any of you post have to do with killing at any of our embassy offices??

I think you are well past lost..



Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:22:28   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
permafrost wrote:
what the heck does any of you post have to do with killing at any of our embassy offices??

I think you are well past lost..


I was answering to your stupid meme...And yes..Killery is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi!!!

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:23:12   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
JFlorio wrote:
I believe you are correct. One of the reasons I believe Benghazi never went anywhere is because it was an illegal gun running operation which both Democrats and Republicans were involved. Always seemed weird to me that Boehner left around then.


it was worse than JUST GUN RUNNING, a particular type of mortar was given to radicals! No help was send
because the BRAVE MEN that came to consulate aid, was order not too - they wanted what happen to happen to keep the REAL STORY from being told. YES, TREASON happen that day.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 18:24:01   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
proud republican wrote:
What's good for the goose is good for the gander!!!




now you are making some fool claim that right wingers never insulted President Obama??

ONly like never before in the world, even before he was in office.. the hate and lies of right wingers is a legend in your own time..

no one hates like a right winger.. not even ISIS..



Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:27:09   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
oh yes OBAMA is a TRAITOR and always will be just that, nothing else.......because was not the 1st time in history that there has been HIGH TREASON in our government.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:28:59   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
proud republican wrote:
But he also couldnt charge him with obstruction...



That seem only because the Justice Dept believes you can not indict a sitting prisedent..

I would have liked to see that go via the courts even with the partisan SC It should have been made fact one way or the other..

But Mueller did write that trump could not be exonerated..

Perhaps an AG of the United States would have taken that step.

As it was the AG of the orange A** did what he was hired to do and glossed everything for the POS paying him..



Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:30:07   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
proud republican wrote:
Where is it documented???Show me!!...It was all debunked in Mueller Report...But good ole Willie loves young interns specially the ones who give good BJ,and who could blame him???

If i was married to this old hag i probably would seek love somewhere else too.....
Where is it documented???Show me!!...It was all de... (show quote)


it's for sure he never got it at home.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 18:30:49   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
proud republican wrote:
I was answering to your stupid meme...And yes..Killery is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi!!!




Even your own 8 investigation of Lady Hillary and Benghazi found other wise..



Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:32:53   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Owl32 wrote:
it was worse than JUST GUN RUNNING, a particular type of mortar was given to radicals! No help was send
because the BRAVE MEN that came to consulate aid, was order not too - they wanted what happen to happen to keep the REAL STORY from being told. YES, TREASON happen that day.


read your own report ....




The Republican-led House Select Committee on Benghazi has been investigating the attack on the US diplomatic mission in Libya since May 2014. The committee's report, released on Tuesday morning, contains several new details about the attack but finds no new evidence of wrongdoing by Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, nor any new evidence of the administration plotting to hide the truth from the American people. Yet the report spins the evidence as harmful for the administration regardless.

For example, a big question in the highly partisan fight over the Benghazi attack has been whether the Obama administration could have stopped the attack with nearby US military assets but simply chose not to. This has been a theory, in some right-wing circles particularly, for a long time.

The House Select Committee’s report finds that there were no American forces in range, the same conclusion as previous reports. Yet it positions this fact as evidence of the Obama administration’s failures:

The assets ultimately deployed by the Defense Department in response to the Benghazi attacks were not positioned to arrive prior to the final lethal attack on the Annex. The fact that this is true does not mitigate the question of why the world’s most powerful military was not positioned to respond; or why the urgency and ingenuity displayed by team members at the Annex and Team Tripoli was seemingly not shared by all decision makers in Washington.

In other words: The facts find the administration wasn’t responsible for failing to stop the Benghazi attack, but the report tries to spin this evidence in a way that’s bad for Team Obama anyway. You see similar attempts to spin non-damning facts as damning in other parts of the report as well.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:42:34   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
proud republican wrote:
President Trump needs to reopen both Fast and the Furious and Benghazi

Who says he hasn't? Just because it's not plastered across the news stations doesn't mean there's nothing going on. If he's smart, he'll leave his various law enforcement agencies to do their jobs and read the reports when they're finished. He said he was going to 'lock her up', we've seen him keep a lot of promises in the last couple of years, plenty of time yet.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 18:45:30   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Who says he hasn't? Just because it's not plastered across the news stations doesn't mean there's nothing going on. If he's smart, he'll leave his various law enforcement agencies to do their jobs and read the reports when they're finished. He said he was going to 'lock her up', we've seen him keep a lot of promises in the last couple of years, plenty of time yet.


I really hope you are right,Larry...Although i doubt it..

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2019 18:46:39   #
Mikeyavelli
 
proud republican wrote:
Do you see indictment in his future???......I dont...Republicans are too chicken shits to do something about it...I hope AG Barr is not one of them!!!...But i also wont hold my breath...


First of all, you are absolutely correct in assuming that no one in Washington DC has the historical courage to prosecute a former first lady and two former presidents. That ain't gonna happen.
Secondly, the reason Obama didn't do anything about Russian interference in the elections was because...there wasn't any.
Russia denies it, not to lie, but to expose what really happened.
Oh sure, there might have been some mischief from Russia, but nothing like the intelligence bureaus report.
Maybe you should know "Russia" by his former name: Seth Rich.
All this is backstory for the cover up of Seth's murder.
Assange is dangerous to Obama and Clinton if he's prosecuted. He'll tell the real story.

Reply
Apr 24, 2019 19:27:40   #
Carol Kelly
 
proud republican wrote:
Obama was warned at least 2 years ahead of 2016 election about Russian interference in our election...Yet he did NOTHING about it until it was to late!!!...Now i know what "Tell Vlad I will be more flexible!" means....Will he ever be investigated for this???
Obama was warned at least 2 years ahead of 2016 el... (show quote)


I would hope so, but he and Hilary, etc., are insulated. Don’t hold your breath.

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 05:35:48   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
permafrost wrote:
Not even close..

No collusion... not what was written.. no proof that could stand up in court.. very different.. life time criminal who covered his fat a**...

Uranium one... damn, how many times has the BS been explained to you and you still fail to understand..

No american uranium went to Russia. Period... end of make believe.. wake up, only your dreams are letting you think this is true in anyway.. did not happen.. THINK ABOUT IT!!!

Lady Hillary was a hard liner on Putin/Russia... President Obama had already laid down sanctions and kicked Russians out of the United States..

A fool and his mind are soon parted.. You best start hunting darn quick..
Not even close.. br br No collusion... not what w... (show quote)


Boy, you really trust the government don’t you Permafrost? You really believe the government and politicians should be trusted and supported at all cost by you and anyone else for anything they say or do, don’t you?

You must be very proud of yourself for being a willing and complicit lackey for the most corrupt mafia-style cabal that has ever existed in the USA, if not ever.

Because I gotta hand it to you, you are very good at spewing the official cover-up version, but, unfortunately, you’re not very good at thinking for yourself outside of the official propaganda you’re constantly fed by your handlers. Ironic that you leftists accuse right wingers of only listening to Fox news when you are the ones who don’t dare wonder outside the confines of left wing alphabet news agencies who are constantly spewing a uniform, prescripted narrative. Or maybe it’s worse, maybe you are a paid Soros lackey. How much does the Soros outfit pay you to regurgitate their propaganda? We all know what they call women who offer their services of infidelity for money, it’s even worse for those who do it for free...is that what you are, a political prostitute, or just a plain old political slut?

When you’re ready to critically examine the evidence on the other side of your ideological cage, you may find this article at Judicial Watch informative and a good place to start;

~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-justice-state-departments-uranium-one-records/

Judicial Watch Sues Justice and State Departments for Uranium One Records
APRIL 10, 2018
Clinton operations receive tens of millions of dollars of contributions from Uranium One/Russia Interests
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State for all records of communications relating to Uranium One (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00722)). The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 29.
Judicial Watch sued the agencies after they failed to respond to two December 22, 2017, FOIA requests. Judicial Watch asked the Justice Department for:
* All records regarding, the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the offices of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and the National Security Division from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.
The State Department was asked to produce:
* Any records relating to the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Legal Advisor, Office of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, Office of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, Office of International Security and Nonproliferation, and the Office of Political-Military Affairs from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.
This lawsuit is part of Judicial Watch’s continuing investigation of the highly controversial 2010 Uranium One deal. At the time, a Russia state-owned nuclear firm, Rosatom, sought to buy Uranium One, a Canadian mining company. Because Uranium One held licenses for 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity, the sale had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who assented to the transaction. Uranium One interests contributed more than $140 million to the Clinton Foundation.
In January 2008, Judicial Watch revealed that Bill Clinton had helped Vancouver mining mogul Frank Giustra secure tens of millions of dollars’ worth of uranium. Guistra built a company that became part of Uranium One. The Clinton Foundation later received a $31.3 million donation, as well as a future pledge of $100 million. In July 2014, Judicial Watch released more than 200 Clinton conflict-of interest documents, including a record of a speech in Moscow in June 2010 sponsored by the investment bank Renaissance Capital by Bill Clinton addressing the theme of “Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Going Global.” The document notes that “Renaissance Capital is an investment bank focused on the emerging markets of Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and sub-Saharan Africa.” Renaissance Capital has also been linked to Russia efforts to gain control of Uranium One.
“It is simply remarkable that Judicial Watch had to sue the State and Justice Departments in federal court for basic information about the shady Uranium One deal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It seems Judicial Watch has done more to investigate the Clinton-Russia connections than the Justice Department, even as DOJ resources are spent on supporting Mueller’s massive investigation into the fanciful Clinton Dossier-inspired Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. We hope the Uranium One cover-up ends thanks to these lawsuits.”
According to a 2013 New York Times report, the Clinton Foundation hid many of the beneficiaries of the Uranium One deal approved by CFIUS and Mrs. Clinton:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank [Renaissance Capital] with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.
Prior to the Uranium One deal, the FBI reportedly “had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.”
Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.
***
Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.
The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rob Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe …”

~~~~~~~~~~
So you’re saying the fact that “Uranium One interests contributed more than $140 million to the Clinton Foundation“ doesn’t concern you because Clinton and Obama and their crew told you there’s nothing to see here, folks?

Just, wow! That’s what we call drinking deep from the Kool Aid!

You see, you simply need to learn to look at and discern what is actual evidence, rather than the cover up, Orwellian, propaganda version that is put forth by the perpetrators. What you are regurgitating is nothing more than their self-serving statements meant to promote and defend themselves (which statements do NOT constitute “evidence”, which is why I refer to them as the propaganda you just love so well that you don’t miss an opportunity to repeat for us).

the truth is, the whole gambit of accusing Trump of collusion with the Russians was to to take the heat off Hillary by blaming Trump instead, for Hillary’s biggest vulnerability. It’s all documented: https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-156847-1.html

So which is it, Permafrost?:

A) You love and trust government so much that, for you, the “official story” that comes out of a politician’s mouth must be blindly believed and supported at all cost as long as it supports your political party and damages your competition?
Or
B) you are getting paid by the Soros cabal to help spread chaos in America so he can get even richer.
Or
C) Soros doesn’t have to pay you a thing, you are perfectly happy doing infidelity to your country for free just for the pleasure of party before country, maybe?
Or
D) you just love not having to do any critical thinking on your own because you don’t have to; your party tells you what to think, and they must be really, really smart to have the MSM and the heads of the department of justice in their back pockets.
Or
E) some combination of all the above?

All I can say is, boy, it sucks to be you. Why? Jesus said it best when he said knowing the truth sets you free, which means you are in an unenviable position of mental bondage and slavery to your beloved, big-government-mafia-style handlers. I Thank the Lord Jesus I snapped out of it! There’s still hope for you, too, you know. Just pick up your brain from the cloakroom attendant where you checked it in at, and use it to do a little research on your own outside of your bubble. If you don’t have a clue where to start, perhaps go to YouTube and search for #Walkaway and I’m sure you’ll find some ex-leftists whose story resonates with your personal situation.

Reply
Apr 25, 2019 08:46:49   #
Sew_What
 
proud republican wrote:
I was answering to your stupid meme...And yes..Killery is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi!!!


No she isn't, the murders in the Benghazi are responsible. I don't know what could be more obvious.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.