permafrost wrote:
Not even close..
No collusion... not what was written.. no proof that could stand up in court.. very different.. life time criminal who covered his fat a**...
Uranium one... damn, how many times has the BS been explained to you and you still fail to understand..
No american uranium went to Russia. Period... end of make believe.. wake up, only your dreams are letting you think this is true in anyway.. did not happen.. THINK ABOUT IT!!!
Lady Hillary was a hard liner on Putin/Russia... President Obama had already laid down sanctions and kicked Russians out of the United States..
A fool and his mind are soon parted.. You best start hunting darn quick..
Not even close.. br br No collusion... not what w... (
show quote)
Boy, you really trust the government don’t you Permafrost? You really believe the government and politicians should be trusted and supported at all cost by you and anyone else for anything they say or do, don’t you?
You must be very proud of yourself for being a willing and complicit lackey for the most corrupt mafia-style cabal that has ever existed in the USA, if not ever.
Because I gotta hand it to you, you are very good at spewing the official cover-up version, but, unfortunately, you’re not very good at thinking for yourself outside of the official propaganda you’re constantly fed by your handlers. Ironic that you leftists accuse right wingers of only listening to Fox news when you are the ones who don’t dare wonder outside the confines of left wing alphabet news agencies who are constantly spewing a uniform, prescripted narrative. Or maybe it’s worse, maybe you are a paid Soros lackey. How much does the Soros outfit pay you to regurgitate their propaganda? We all know what they call women who offer their services of infidelity for money, it’s even worse for those who do it for free...is that what you are, a political prostitute, or just a plain old political slut?
When you’re ready to critically examine the evidence on the other side of your ideological cage, you may find this article at Judicial Watch informative and a good place to start;
~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-justice-state-departments-uranium-one-records/Judicial Watch Sues Justice and State Departments for Uranium One Records
APRIL 10, 2018
Clinton operations receive tens of millions of dollars of contributions from Uranium One/Russia Interests(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of State for all records of communications relating to Uranium One (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00722)). The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 29.
Judicial Watch sued the agencies after they failed to respond to two December 22, 2017, FOIA requests. Judicial Watch asked the Justice Department for:
* All records regarding, the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the offices of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and the National Security Division from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.
The State Department was asked to produce:
* Any records relating to the company Uranium One (otherwise known as Uranium One, Inc. or SXR Uranium One, Inc.), including records of communication sent to and from officials in the Office of the Secretary of State, Office of the Legal Advisor, Office of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, Office of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, Office of International Security and Nonproliferation, and the Office of Political-Military Affairs from January 20, 2009 through December 31, 2013.
This lawsuit is part of Judicial Watch’s continuing investigation of the highly controversial 2010 Uranium One deal.
At the time, a Russia state-owned nuclear firm, Rosatom, sought to buy Uranium One, a Canadian mining company. Because Uranium One held licenses for 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity, the sale had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who assented to the transaction.
Uranium One interests contributed more than $140 million to the Clinton Foundation.In January 2008, Judicial Watch revealed that Bill Clinton had helped Vancouver mining mogul Frank Giustra secure tens of millions of dollars’ worth of uranium. Guistra built a company that became part of Uranium One. The Clinton Foundation later received a $31.3 million donation, as well as a future pledge of $100 million.
In July 2014, Judicial Watch released more than 200 Clinton conflict-of interest documents, including a record of a speech in Moscow in June 2010 sponsored by the investment bank Renaissance Capital by Bill Clinton addressing the theme of “Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Going Global.” The document notes that “Renaissance Capital is an investment bank focused on the emerging markets of Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and sub-Saharan Africa.” Renaissance Capital has also been linked to Russia efforts to gain control of Uranium One.
“It is simply remarkable that Judicial Watch had to sue the State and Justice Departments in federal court for basic information about the shady Uranium One deal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “
It seems Judicial Watch has done more to investigate the Clinton-Russia connections than the Justice Department, even as DOJ resources are spent on supporting Mueller’s massive investigation into the fanciful Clinton Dossier-inspired Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. We hope the Uranium One cover-up ends thanks to these lawsuits.”According to a 2013 New York Times report, the Clinton Foundation hid many of the beneficiaries of the Uranium One deal approved by CFIUS and Mrs. Clinton:As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013,
Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank [Renaissance Capital] with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.Prior to the Uranium One deal, the FBI reportedly “had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.”
Rather than bring immediate charges in 2010, however, the Department of Justice (DOJ) continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions.
***
Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.
The investigation was ultimately supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rob Rosenstein, an Obama appointee who now serves as President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe …”
~~~~~~~~~~
So you’re saying the fact that “Uranium One interests contributed more than $140 million to the Clinton Foundation“ doesn’t concern you because Clinton and Obama and their crew told you there’s nothing to see here, folks?
Just, wow! That’s what we call drinking deep from the Kool Aid!
You see, you simply need to learn to look at and discern what is actual evidence, rather than the cover up, Orwellian, propaganda version that is put forth by the perpetrators. What you are regurgitating is nothing more than their self-serving statements meant to promote and defend themselves (which statements do NOT constitute “evidence”, which is why I refer to them as the propaganda you just love so well that you don’t miss an opportunity to repeat for us).
the truth is, the whole gambit of accusing Trump of collusion with the Russians was to to take the heat off Hillary by blaming Trump instead, for Hillary’s biggest vulnerability. It’s all documented:
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-156847-1.htmlSo which is it, Permafrost?:
A) You love and trust government so much that, for you, the “official story” that comes out of a politician’s mouth must be blindly believed and supported at all cost as long as it supports your political party and damages your competition?
Or
B) you are getting paid by the Soros cabal to help spread chaos in America so he can get even richer.
Or
C) Soros doesn’t have to pay you a thing, you are perfectly happy doing infidelity to your country for free just for the pleasure of party before country, maybe?
Or
D) you just love not having to do any critical thinking on your own because you don’t have to; your party tells you what to think, and they must be really, really smart to have the MSM and the heads of the department of justice in their back pockets.
Or
E) some combination of all the above?
All I can say is, boy, it sucks to be you. Why? Jesus said it best when he said knowing the truth sets you free, which means you are in an unenviable position of mental bondage and slavery to your beloved, big-government-mafia-style handlers. I Thank the Lord Jesus I snapped out of it! There’s still hope for you, too, you know. Just pick up your brain from the cloakroom attendant where you checked it in at, and use it to do a little research on your own outside of your bubble. If you don’t have a clue where to start, perhaps go to YouTube and search for #Walkaway and I’m sure you’ll find some ex-leftists whose story resonates with your personal situation.