One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
When you were 16 years old were you ever interested in politics???
Page <<first <prev 17 of 18 next>
Mar 24, 2019 14:55:33   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Sadly the left has been in charge of our educational system for over 50 years. So while academically the quality of our education has declined, the social, (socialist,) engineering has been going strong. Indoctrination is the goal, and the right really took their eyes off the ball on this one. But, in fairness, most people didn't think their fellow Americans were corrupt or stupid enough to target our children with an evil ideology like socialism/Marxism/communist/collectivism. Unfortunately they were wrong, and we are now paying the price
Sadly the left has been in charge of our education... (show quote)


Infiltrating the educational system is a plank of the communist manifesto.
AND; boy are they using it.

Reply
Mar 24, 2019 15:03:56   #
Nickolai
 
Jakebrake wrote:
This is the biggest crock of shit I have ever read in my life!








http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/ A call to arms to Corporations

A crock of shit my ass, that is the absolute truth. " Read the manifesto ." There hasn't been a house built in California with union labor for over 25 years. The big developers conspired to put the unions out of business in the 1970's, by 1992 there were no more union sub contractors building homes anywhere in the state . The construction unions have shrunk to only commercial and industrial projects. A union Carpenter working on a commercial project earns $ 40.50 per hr. plus $15.00 an hr. in benefits paid into a trust fund, compared to $26,50 per an hr. with no benefits for the non union carpenter. I now because I researched it. I was paying a wage package of $27.00 per hr, 35 years ago.

Reply
Mar 24, 2019 17:07:16   #
Ricktloml
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Infiltrating the educational system is a plank of the communist manifesto.
AND; boy are they using it.


Yes they are, and it is sickening.

Reply
 
 
Mar 24, 2019 18:20:39   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Yes they are, and it is sickening.


Not to a lot of Democrats, that still vote Democrat.

Reply
Mar 24, 2019 23:43:53   #
Nickolai
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Yes they are, and it is sickening.






If our schools are brain washing our kids why have the little people been loosing out ever since Lewis Powel declared war on the working class in 1971





Reply
Mar 25, 2019 13:10:10   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Nickolai wrote:
If our schools are brain washing our kids why have the little people been loosing out ever since Lewis Powel declared war on the working class in 1971


Nick; how is the working class doing in Venezuela, Cuba, and Venezuela?
How is Trump's administration doing?
Nick; are you aware that Trump was not the choice of the establishment?

BTW; I just noticed your graphs only go to 2007.

Reply
Mar 25, 2019 15:45:08   #
Nickolai
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Nick; how is the working class doing in Venezuela, Cuba, and Venezuela?
How is Trump's administration doing?
Nick; are you aware that Trump was not the choice of the establishment?

BTW; I just noticed your graphs only go to 2007.





The trends are still intact through the Obama era and has had a little boost recently and the tax cuts benefited those who didn't need a tax cut so the increase in wealth that springs from increased productivity is still accruing to the top of the charts and working people are continuing to suck





Reply
 
 
Mar 25, 2019 15:59:06   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Nickolai wrote:
The trends are still intact through the Obama era and has had a little boost recently and the tax cuts benefited those who didn't need a tax cut so the increase in wealth that springs from increased productivity is still accruing to the top of the charts and working people are continuing to suck


Sooo nicki; How did the working middle class become the "underclass"?

Reply
Mar 25, 2019 20:11:34   #
Nickolai
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Sooo nicki; How did the working middle class become the "underclass"?







That's a loooong story and it begins following WW-ll It will take me a while "The great Purge part #1

This has to do with the interaction between politics and economics. Its well known that the economic situation shapes our politics. Sometimes it’s not as well understood how, and how deeply politics shapes our economic realities. I want to begin as good stories of our situation always do going back setting the historical context and I want to ask a question--at the end of WW-ll in the late 1940's into the 50's something remarkable happened politically in the United States. And it was in many ways surprising, lets review. Suddenly a group of people in the US who had been celebrated wide spread as hero's became instead almost over night demons, from being leaders they became traitors--it was really remarkable. Who are we talking about, members of the communist party members of the two socialist parties at that time and active leaders of the American labor movement.

The big organizing drive's of the CIO in the 1930's and 40's had brought millions of people who had never been in unions before into the unions. They joined the unions because they thought it would be a safe way to make it through the Great Depression of the 1930's than not being in a union, and together, the communist's , socialist's, and the unions, struggled to produce a good situation for the mass of American workers. the lower two thirds of our population at least. During the depression when those people were really suffering a kind of a coalition emerged and that was what was being destroyed in the years following WW-ll. The coalition was strong enough during the 1930's to basically pressure FDR to institute four basic programs to help average Americans in a way no previous administration had dared to do.

First was the creation of the Social Security System but also their children who therefore didn't have to help their mother and father as they would otherwise have had to--the government was lending a hand.
Then the government did another thing it created the Unemployment Compensation System. We had never had that before either, and this was done in the depths of the depression when millions and millions of people had no visible means of support and who suddenly got a life line. Third they passed the first minimum wage we had ever had in American history and finally the FDR government said-- because the private system would not --or could not provide the jobs people needed, FDR said, we will, and they hired 15 million people. They built some of the big national parks out west they did some of the first conservation work, to give artists of all kinds to bring art to the masses in a way it had never been done before and by the way has never been done since. Unemployed people got a good job doing something useful and they got paid properly so they could make their mortgage payment.

The mass of people were helped because had joined unions, and had become interested in, and listened to socialist's, communist's, who said people deserved that-- and an economic system that didn't provide that was maybe wasn't justified. And where did the money come from ? --in the depths of the depression when the government didn’t have any money ? The answer was Roosevelt taxed the corporations and the rich. That’s right He taxed the corporations and the rich, that’s how he paid for it. And the result for him was, he was re-elected three times. He was the most popular President in the history of the United States. Because he was the one that went after the corporations and the rich to help average people. But he didn't do it for him--- He was no radical left winger he was a conventional rich kid, went to all the good schools Harvard, Yale, ect, ect.

After the war The rich and Corporations, resentful that they had been taxed to help the working class, decided to change the world to their liking and to attack the weakest link of the enemy, the Communist party, and it was soon demonized out of existence. Then they went after the Socialist party and demonized it out of existence. Then they went after the labor movement, and they have done a good job. It started with the passage of the Taft Hartly act of 1947. In 1945 unions represented a third of American workers, today they represent 6 % of private sector workers. Communist party destroyed, Socialist party destroyed, labor unions reduced to a pale shadow of what it once was. This chaotic destruction of the left in America traumatized the American people. At least that half of the population that is open to critical thinking about capitalism. The kinds of people who face an uncertain job a job with no benefits, and in sufficient wage to lead a decent life and say that has to change a change those people had gotten that change in the 1930's and they watched as all the leaders that had gotten that change were demonized, jailed, blacklisted, deported as though they were the sum total of all evil. A lesson was drummed into the American people. Don’t have anything to do with people who are critical of capitalism. Don’t have anything to do with people who are socialist in one way or another, it was shut down time and it lasted half a century or more.

Reply
Mar 25, 2019 20:35:14   #
Nickolai
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Sooo nicki; How did the working middle class become the "underclass"?







The great purge part #2

The Taft Hartley Act

In 1947 congress passed the Taft Hartley Act it was a remarkable Bill. It specifically told labor unions they could not elect democratically their own leaders. For example it forbade a communist from running for office winning a majority of the votes and serving as the leader of a union which communist had been doing for 20 or more years in the US without incident. It became illegal. But it went much further it had a remarkable clause that remains law to this day, and the clause goes like this--if at a workplace, a factory, an office, a store, and let’s say there is a union, and let’s say half the workers in this workplace have voted for the union and joined the union and have a union there and lets say that union negotiates with the employer and gets a contract. Let’s say a wage increase of ten cents per hr.

Under the Taft Hartley law then and to this moment that union must give anything it wins to all the workers there whether they are in the union or not. Whether they joined the union or not, whether they pay union dues or not, whether the union if it thought it had to called a strike to tell the public about their situation to help pressure the employer to meet them half -way and give them a wage increase. The workers that went on strike and therefore didn't get paid had to give to all the other workers who didn't go on strike and didn't lose a days pay the same benefits they won. The Taft Hartley law in effect created an incentive not to join the union-- not to pay the union dues. They would get whatever the union won whether they did so or not. That’ fundamentally unfair and you and I both know it and the people then knew it.


It was a hammer blow against the union. This was designed to destroy the communist and the labor unions and the coalition between them it was a clever way to abuse the law in the interest of a purge but it it had the effect of weakening the labor movement. It was the opening gun and there are many more laws that came afterward that amounted to a direct assault on the labor movement which has worked well in reducing union membership from about 35 % in 1945 to about 6 % today in the private sector a staggering cut back. Anyone in America (and there are a few) who talks about big business on the one hand and big labor on the other is either ignorant or lying in your face. Big business has gotten bigger and richer and big labor is gone.


There is no big labor hasn’t been for years we are an economy which is dominated by one side of what used to be a rough balance and boy does it show. Beginning in the 1970's the Government began reverting to the order of things as it had been from inception untill the National labor Relations Act was passed in 1935. Moving the fulcrum of the tetter tottor not to the center for equeal ballance between labor and capital but to the right lifting capital and management and leaving labor sitting on the ground going no where. I saw the first evidence of it in 1978 but didnt recognize it as a conspiracy for another year and then it was clear it was a conspiracy by 1984 I was forced to gonon union in orer to survive the onslaught of non union competition At the time I waspying my union employees $20.000 per hr plus $7.50 in benefits. Health ins, vacation pay, pension plan. Last summer I researched the pay of todays non union carpenter in Calif and found the average pay for a non union carpenter to be $26.50 with no benefits fifty cents less than My pay package 35 years ago.



Reply
Apr 1, 2019 11:53:01   #
Mutton Dressed As Lamb
 
Jakebrake wrote:
When I was 16 all I thought about was girls, pussy and who I could find that was old enough to buy me beer~~


I guess you were a "tits R us" kid

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2019 11:53:39   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Mutton Dressed As Lamb wrote:
I guess you were a "tits R us" kid



Reply
Apr 1, 2019 12:08:14   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Was this ever discussed in school?

THE ELECTION FIX
How the International Bankers and their owned Media have scammed the voting public for decades.
EVER WONDER WHY BOTH PARTIES KEEP SELLING OUR REPUBLIC OUT TO THE NWO?
Bought politicians are sold out to the Bankers NWO agenda. Many are members of David Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) & Trilateral Commission (TC)
– Quite a Partnership! Both parties have given us a $22 TRILLION DEBT to the Private Fed Banksters; paying them interest for the use of our own money. If Art.1 Sec. 8 of The Constitution were followed; there would be no debt to those parasites.
Here is how “THE FIX” works: Dems nominate a globalist/socialist & RePubs a globalist/fascist; both associated with Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and Trilateral Commission (TC). (ie. KerryVsBush, BushVsGore, BushVsClinton, FordVsCarter,HillaryVsMcCain) Then enough conned voters, vote for “the lesser of two evils”. All other parties and candidates are ignored, smeared and eliminated with the help of the owned media.
Now that Obama has filled his cabinet with CFR/TC members, as all the previous administrations since Jimmy Carter did; the sell out continues.

The Republican Party NEOCON “leadership”, is the Fascist arm of the Banker’s CFR/TC/Bilderberg NWO agenda. The voters were duped into nominating another CFR member (McCain), with the same internationalist NWO agenda. Obama continues the Banker’s NWO agenda . The Int’l Banksters got what they wanted either way; the further elimination of our liberties and the Constitution, and the continued raiding of our treasury.
Many CONgressmen/Politicians are Parasites serving Master Parasites (Banksters)
SAY NO TO Rockefeller's NWO CFR/TC/Bilderberg Group AGENDA:

Bushes - CFR,B (R)
Clintons - CFR,B (D)
Mitt Romney - CFR (R) Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Barack Obama - CFR (D)
Christopher Dodd - CFR (D)
Bill Richardson - CFR (D)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, B (D)
Henry Kissinger - B (R) Paul Volker - CFR,TC,B A Greenspan / B Bernanke B
YouTube search: Freedom to Fascism
The Banksters have used Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Dictatorships & “Democracy” to enslave the world

James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR's "brain trust", testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, "We shall have world government whether or not you like it--by conquest or consent”
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack"
- Richard Gardner in CFR publication - Foreign Affairs - April, 1974.

Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZB) formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1970’s, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter later became President, & ZB was made Carter's National Security Adviser.
“Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner passive man and a victory of reason over belief… and has served to stir the mind and to mobilize human energies purposefully ” (p.72) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)
Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the communist system.” (pp.146,147) ZB –'Between Two Ages' (1970)

MS media & politicians tell Americans the danger is terrorism. Terrorists can't take away habeus corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. Terrorists can't suspend the constitutional government, or abolish the separation of powers. TERRORISM CANNOT PICK US UP, SHUT US UP, OR ARREST US. The threat of terrorism is nothing like the threat of our own government in the name of fighting terrorism.

UNDERSTAND- Both party leaderships have been partners in Int’l Globalism: Ron Paul went up against the snakes on the MSM, and his party shut him out. The media and party “leaderships” tried to do the same to Trump. NWO Fascism or Socialism but no Constitutionalism - no real conservative choice - no Populism. True liberty is not allowed by their NWO controllers. Both parties have been partners in subjugation to the PRIVATE Federal Reserve Bankers.

Ask Rush L. why he has always blocked all attempts to discuss CFR,TC,Bilderberg!
Why does Rush say “Follow the money.” But does not??? CALL HIM!!!
Rush has always shielded the Banksters. Why? Judas Goat?
CONGRESS - Audit and FIRE the Private Federal Reserve
Congress has the power & responsibility to issue US Notes without interest to the Banksters
A great book on CFR/NWO agenda – ‘Descent into Slavery’ by Des Griffin at Amazon
Research: CFR/TC/Bilderberg Group

Reply
Apr 9, 2019 11:21:17   #
acknowledgeurma
 
Nickolai wrote:
The great purge part #2

The Taft Hartley Act

In 1947 congress passed the Taft Hartley Act it was a remarkable Bill. It specifically told labor unions they could not elect democratically their own leaders. For example it forbade a communist from running for office winning a majority of the votes and serving as the leader of a union which communist had been doing for 20 or more years in the US without incident. It became illegal. But it went much further it had a remarkable clause that remains law to this day, and the clause goes like this--if at a workplace, a factory, an office, a store, and let’s say there is a union, and let’s say half the workers in this workplace have voted for the union and joined the union and have a union there and lets say that union negotiates with the employer and gets a contract. Let’s say a wage increase of ten cents per hr.

Under the Taft Hartley law then and to this moment that union must give anything it wins to all the workers there whether they are in the union or not. Whether they joined the union or not, whether they pay union dues or not, whether the union if it thought it had to called a strike to tell the public about their situation to help pressure the employer to meet them half -way and give them a wage increase. The workers that went on strike and therefore didn't get paid had to give to all the other workers who didn't go on strike and didn't lose a days pay the same benefits they won. The Taft Hartley law in effect created an incentive not to join the union-- not to pay the union dues. They would get whatever the union won whether they did so or not. That’ fundamentally unfair and you and I both know it and the people then knew it.


It was a hammer blow against the union. This was designed to destroy the communist and the labor unions and the coalition between them it was a clever way to abuse the law in the interest of a purge but it it had the effect of weakening the labor movement. It was the opening gun and there are many more laws that came afterward that amounted to a direct assault on the labor movement which has worked well in reducing union membership from about 35 % in 1945 to about 6 % today in the private sector a staggering cut back. Anyone in America (and there are a few) who talks about big business on the one hand and big labor on the other is either ignorant or lying in your face. Big business has gotten bigger and richer and big labor is gone.


There is no big labor hasn’t been for years we are an economy which is dominated by one side of what used to be a rough balance and boy does it show. Beginning in the 1970's the Government began reverting to the order of things as it had been from inception untill the National labor Relations Act was passed in 1935. Moving the fulcrum of the tetter tottor not to the center for equeal ballance between labor and capital but to the right lifting capital and management and leaving labor sitting on the ground going no where. I saw the first evidence of it in 1978 but didnt recognize it as a conspiracy for another year and then it was clear it was a conspiracy by 1984 I was forced to gonon union in orer to survive the onslaught of non union competition At the time I waspying my union employees $20.000 per hr plus $7.50 in benefits. Health ins, vacation pay, pension plan. Last summer I researched the pay of todays non union carpenter in Calif and found the average pay for a non union carpenter to be $26.50 with no benefits fifty cents less than My pay package 35 years ago.
The great purge part #2 br br The Taft Hartley Ac... (show quote)


Interesting analysis. I wonder what the Trumputistas think of it.

Reply
Apr 9, 2019 11:39:05   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
acknowledgeurma wrote:
Interesting analysis. I wonder what the Trumputistas think of it.


"Interesting analysis." - acknowledgeurma
Did you read it, acknowledgeurma?

Please give us a summary of Nickolai's long "history" lesson.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 17 of 18 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.