One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Really Blatant Lies About Welfare That People Actually Believe: who do you think would be spreading them?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Mar 22, 2019 21:12:32   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
rumitoid wrote:
You absolutely did not ask a question. You said very clearly, "...you should have read the report and given supportable claims based on the source document." Where is the question? My emotions get in the way of truth? How about your own words getting their first. I am done with your Trumpian-spin. Have a nice day.


Oh dear.... your feeling are hurt.... poor darling. So.... should you have read the report for yourself and draw your own conclusions and observations? Just my opinion, but I think the report was too limited in how many people they tracked. Had they expanded their base they would have clearly come out with a pattern..... being that people who do not live in cities are more apt to use the programs as a hand up rather than an expectation of entitlements. Also, had they limited their base to cities they would have found that hispanics in California and along the border are far more apt to receive welfare. And had they limited the base to the North East, they would have seen that blacks are the overwhelming participates in the programs. Had they focused on the rust belt, they would have seen that white women dominate the statistics. The report had faults, but taking it with those limitations in mind, the report gave a fairly good understanding where the welfare dollars are spent. Huff however made the issue into a point of them vs us, another point put out just to divide our nation. And you built on this devision by not reading the report and drawing your conclusions. As I said.... numbers do not lie. Adding in your characterization of my opinion as a "trumpian spin" does not help your argument.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 21:22:06   #
rumitoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Oh dear.... your feeling are hurt.... poor darling. So.... should you have read the report for yourself and draw your own conclusions and observations? Just my opinion, but I think the report was too limited in how many people they tracked. Had they expanded their base they would have clearly come out with a pattern..... being that people who do not live in cities are more apt to use the programs as a hand up rather than an expectation of entitlements. Also, had they limited their base to cities they would have found that hispanics in California and along the border are far more apt to receive welfare. And had they limited the base to the North East, they would have seen that blacks are the overwhelming participates in the programs. Had they focused on the rust belt, they would have seen that white women dominate the statistics. The report had faults, but taking it with those limitations in mind, the report gave a fairly good understanding where the welfare dollars are spent. Huff however made the issue into a point of them vs us, another point put out just to divide our nation. And you built on this devision by not reading the report and drawing your conclusions. As I said.... numbers do not lie. Adding in your characterization of my opinion as a "trumpian spin" does not help your argument.
Oh dear.... your feeling are hurt.... poor darling... (show quote)


Droll on, pussycat. No Fancy Treats for you.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 21:38:22   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
rumitoid wrote:
Droll on, pussycat. No Fancy Treats for you.


It is a simple question, so I wonder why you can not respond.... could it be that you would have to admit that you should have done your discovery much better before submitting such a politically dividing article? I think if people start using their intelligence and stop letting the media form their opinions for then our nation could come back together.

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2019 21:44:12   #
rumitoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
It is a simple question, so I wonder why you can not respond.... could it be that you would have to admit that you should have done your discovery much better before submitting such a politically dividing article? I think if people start using their intelligence and stop letting the media form their opinions for then our nation could come back together.


I do not respond to your non-question because it does not exist. You made a direct accusation. And this post is not helping you to get those Fancy Treats.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 22:10:57   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
rumitoid wrote:
I do not respond to your non-question because it does not exist. You made a direct accusation. And this post is not helping you to get those Fancy Treats.


Point taken, so let me fall back and ask a straight forward question. Before you created this thread, did you read for yourself the report cited by Huff?

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 22:25:39   #
rumitoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Point taken, so let me fall back and ask a straight forward question. Before you created this thread, did you read for yourself the report cited by Huff?


"Point taken." Wow! You really love Fancy Treats.

Reply
Mar 22, 2019 23:10:40   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
rumitoid wrote:
"Point taken." Wow! You really love Fancy Treats.


How long do you anticipate that you will avoid a direct question? To quote your favorite president "Shuckin' and jivin'" is not working. Try a direct response.

Reply
 
 
Mar 22, 2019 23:29:03   #
rumitoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
How long do you anticipate that you will avoid a direct question? To quote your favorite president "Shuckin' and jivin'" is not working. Try a direct response.


Yawn. And I will not bite on your racist comments about Obama "Shuckin' and jivin.'" Pathetic, and all that just to get Fancy Treats? Behave! Be a good kitty.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.