One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Doesn't Need to Declare a National Emergency
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Feb 14, 2019 09:45:55   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
"No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!"

4 exclamation marks as if we are to believe you... pathetic

On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

On December 1, 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law adopted by the Federal Assembly under which the Federal Atomic Energy Agency were to be abolished, and its powers and assets were to be transferred to the newly created "State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom." On December 12 of the same year, the agency transformed into a state corporation with Sergey Kiriyenko appointed general director. In July 2008, Rosatom adopted an activity program designed to last till 2023. Rosatom's positions were further strengthened by the transfer of the nuclear civil icebreaking fleet FSUE Atomflot under Rosatom's jurisdiction

Through its subsidiaries and joint ventures Uranium One owns Akdala, South Inkai, Karatau, Akbastau and Kharasan uranium mines in Kazakhstan, the conserved Willow Creek uranium mine in the United States, and the Mkuju River uranium project in Tanzania.

Your would be better off trying to prove your BS rather than posting your cutesy little JPG's to validate your opinion?

Yes, Putin got some US Uranium.

No Russia does not have plenty of Uranium...

Kazakstan produces the most at 39%

Canada at 22%... (yes, Uranium One is a Canadian Company)
Australia at 9.3%
Niger at 6.8
Russia at 5%
Namibia at 4.9%
Ubekistan at 3.9%
China at 2.7%
US at 2.1%
Ukraine at 2.0% (no wonder Putin is interested in the Ukraine)

Reply
Feb 14, 2019 11:05:34   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Ferrous wrote:
"No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!"

4 exclamation marks as if we are to believe you... pathetic

On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

On December 1, 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law adopted by the Federal Assembly under which the Federal Atomic Energy Agency were to be abolished, and its powers and assets were to be transferred to the newly created "State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom." On December 12 of the same year, the agency transformed into a state corporation with Sergey Kiriyenko appointed general director. In July 2008, Rosatom adopted an activity program designed to last till 2023. Rosatom's positions were further strengthened by the transfer of the nuclear civil icebreaking fleet FSUE Atomflot under Rosatom's jurisdiction

Through its subsidiaries and joint ventures Uranium One owns Akdala, South Inkai, Karatau, Akbastau and Kharasan uranium mines in Kazakhstan, the conserved Willow Creek uranium mine in the United States, and the Mkuju River uranium project in Tanzania.

Your would be better off trying to prove your BS rather than posting your cutesy little JPG's to validate your opinion?

Yes, Putin got some US Uranium.

No Russia does not have plenty of Uranium...

Kazakstan produces the most at 39%

Canada at 22%... (yes, Uranium One is a Canadian Company)
Australia at 9.3%
Niger at 6.8
Russia at 5%
Namibia at 4.9%
Ubekistan at 3.9%
China at 2.7%
US at 2.1%
Ukraine at 2.0% (no wonder Putin is interested in the Ukraine)
"No, Russia/Putin did not git American uraniu... (show quote)




do you delibretly make your informatioin misleading ???

Your 2010 information is about rosatom buying controlling interest of Uranium One, as you say that was a Canadian company..

Why, because Russia wanted access to the mines in central asia. they were very high production and near to Russia..

In time they (Canadian one) gained development rights to low grade fuel usage mines in the US..

a good deal of these areas were never, to this day developed.

All production was fuel grade. none of the ore or product was sent to Russia.

This was a low level transaction and assistants in all 9 agency did the work,.

Lady Hillary never attended and never sent input to the discussions..

the Russians no longer own Canadian one nor the new company which replaced that organization..

As so often, much ado about nothing at all by the right wing panic crowd..

what is your opinion on our troops being deployed to the Congo??

Do you think the Venezuelan turmoil will result in an oil war in South America?

Do you feel that we should increase sanctions on NK now that they have made no move to reduce thier Nuclear program?



Reply
Feb 14, 2019 13:01:42   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
You are pathetic...

"Uranium One is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROSATOM, the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy. Uranium One is responsible for ROSATOM’s uranium production outside the Russian Federation and is the world’s fourth-largest uranium producer."

http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#mission

I think what you were feeling is nothing more than Morning Wood soon to be P*** away.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2019 13:44:04   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Ferrous wrote:
You are pathetic...

"Uranium One is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROSATOM, the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy. Uranium One is responsible for ROSATOM’s uranium production outside the Russian Federation and is the world’s fourth-largest uranium producer."

http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#mission

I think what you were feeling is nothing more than Morning Wood soon to be P*** away.


https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/


THE WIRE
The Facts on Uranium One
By Eugene Kiely

Posted on October 26, 2017 | Updated on November 1, 2017

35.4K
Two House committees have said that they will investigate the Obama administration’s approval of a deal that gave Russia a financial interest in U.S. uranium production.

The 2010 deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency, to acquire a controlling stake in Uranium One, a Canadian-based company with mining stakes in the Western United States.

We covered it during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Donald Trump falsely accused former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of giving away U.S. uranium rights to the Russians and claimed — without evidence — that it was done in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.



On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

At the time, Uranium One’s two licensed mining operations in Wyoming amounted to about “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.,” according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In-situ recovery is the extraction method currently used by 10 of the 11 licensed U.S. uranium producers.

Uranium One also has exploration projects in Arizona, Colorado and Utah.

But the deal required multiple approvals by the U.S., beginning with the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States. Under federal law, the committee reviews foreign investments that raise potential national security concerns.


For this and other reasons, we have written that Trump is wrong to claim that Clinton “gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States” to Russia. Clinton could have objected — as could the eight other voting members — but that objection alone wouldn’t have stopped the sale of the stake of Uranium One to Rosatom.

We don’t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee’s review and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the department on the committee. “Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter,” he told the Times, referring to the committee by its acronym

It is also important to note that other federal approvals were needed to complete the deal, and even still more approvals would be needed to export the uranium.

First, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to approve the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses in Wyoming from Uranium One to the Russian company. The NRC announced it approved the transfer on Nov. 24, 2010. But, as the NRC explained at the time, “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.”

As NRC explained in a March 2011 letter to Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the Russian company would have to apply for and obtain an export license and “commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes” in accordance with “the U.S.-Russia Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation.”

In a June 2015 letter to Rep. Peter Visclosky, the NRC said it granted RSB Logistics Services an amendment to its export license in 2012 to allow the Kentucky shipping company to export uranium to Canada from various sources — including from a Uranium One site in Wyoming. The NRC said that the export license allowed RSB to ship uranium to a conversion plant in Canada and then back to the United States for further processing.

Canada must obtain U.S. approval to transfer any U.S. uranium to any country other than the United States, the letter says.

“Please be assured that no Uranium One, Inc.-produced uranium has been shipped directly to Russia and the U.S. Government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia,” the 2015 letter said.

“That 2015 statement remains true today,” David McIntyre, a spokesman for the NRC, told us in an email.

Reply
Feb 14, 2019 17:31:24   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
Again, you failed to defend your statement: "No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!"

A lot of cutting and pasting to try and cloud your defense. But still a fail on your part,

Right from the source's mouth:

"Uranium One is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROSATOM, the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy. Uranium One is responsible for ROSATOM’s uranium production outside the Russian Federation and is the world’s fourth-largest uranium producer."

http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#mission

Reply
Feb 14, 2019 18:54:17   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
permafrost wrote:
No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!


Also, Russia has a great deal of their own Uranium...


They have a great deal of Vodka also. Doesn't stop them from wanting more.

Reply
Feb 14, 2019 19:12:34   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Ferrous wrote:
Again, you failed to defend your statement: "No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!"

A lot of cutting and pasting to try and cloud your defense. But still a fail on your part,

Right from the source's mouth:

"Uranium One is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROSATOM, the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy. Uranium One is responsible for ROSATOM’s uranium production outside the Russian Federation and is the world’s fourth-largest uranium producer."

http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#mission
Again, you failed to defend your statement: "... (show quote)




you have a reading problem?

from my post....

“Please be assured that no Uranium One, Inc.-produced uranium has been shipped directly to Russia and the U.S. Government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia,” the 2015 letter said.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2019 22:08:08   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
permafrost wrote:
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/


THE WIRE
The Facts on Uranium One
By Eugene Kiely

Posted on October 26, 2017 | Updated on November 1, 2017

35.4K
Two House committees have said that they will investigate the Obama administration’s approval of a deal that gave Russia a financial interest in U.S. uranium production.

The 2010 deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency, to acquire a controlling stake in Uranium One, a Canadian-based company with mining stakes in the Western United States.

We covered it during the 2016 presidential campaign, when Donald Trump falsely accused former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of giving away U.S. uranium rights to the Russians and claimed — without evidence — that it was done in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.



On June 8, 2010, Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.

At the time, Uranium One’s two licensed mining operations in Wyoming amounted to about “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.,” according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In-situ recovery is the extraction method currently used by 10 of the 11 licensed U.S. uranium producers.

Uranium One also has exploration projects in Arizona, Colorado and Utah.

But the deal required multiple approvals by the U.S., beginning with the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States. Under federal law, the committee reviews foreign investments that raise potential national security concerns.


For this and other reasons, we have written that Trump is wrong to claim that Clinton “gave away 20 percent of the uranium in the United States” to Russia. Clinton could have objected — as could the eight other voting members — but that objection alone wouldn’t have stopped the sale of the stake of Uranium One to Rosatom.

We don’t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee’s review and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the department on the committee. “Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter,” he told the Times, referring to the committee by its acronym

It is also important to note that other federal approvals were needed to complete the deal, and even still more approvals would be needed to export the uranium.

First, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to approve the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses in Wyoming from Uranium One to the Russian company. The NRC announced it approved the transfer on Nov. 24, 2010. But, as the NRC explained at the time, “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.”

As NRC explained in a March 2011 letter to Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the Russian company would have to apply for and obtain an export license and “commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes” in accordance with “the U.S.-Russia Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation.”

In a June 2015 letter to Rep. Peter Visclosky, the NRC said it granted RSB Logistics Services an amendment to its export license in 2012 to allow the Kentucky shipping company to export uranium to Canada from various sources — including from a Uranium One site in Wyoming. The NRC said that the export license allowed RSB to ship uranium to a conversion plant in Canada and then back to the United States for further processing.

Canada must obtain U.S. approval to transfer any U.S. uranium to any country other than the United States, the letter says.

“Please be assured that no Uranium One, Inc.-produced uranium has been shipped directly to Russia and the U.S. Government has not authorized any country to re-transfer U.S. uranium to Russia,” the 2015 letter said.

“That 2015 statement remains true today,” David McIntyre, a spokesman for the NRC, told us in an email.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-on... (show quote)


Fact Check?

No wonder you're so doped up!

Government sites, Judicial Watch and a few other places, when combined with some perspective on history, science, etc. are far better sources when added to a healthy knowledge of Scripture will do you better...just sayin'.

Fact Check/Snopes/blahblah is owned and operated by people with a Global Cabal agenda. Get real! Wake up! It's been fun and games for the political elite in America for the last 40 years and more (Reagan was an anomoly) but this is a very different time.

Obama, Klinton(s), and the toadies they put in places of power in the 3 Letters attempted a coup! They're still trying their damnedest in fact, but they ran out of time at the end of last summer. Expect more false flags. It's ignominy, prison and death for them if they don't oust Trump.

Reply
Feb 15, 2019 22:10:24   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Ferrous wrote:
Again, you failed to defend your statement: "No, Russia/Putin did not git American uranium!!!!!"

A lot of cutting and pasting to try and cloud your defense. But still a fail on your part,

Right from the source's mouth:

"Uranium One is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROSATOM, the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy. Uranium One is responsible for ROSATOM’s uranium production outside the Russian Federation and is the world’s fourth-largest uranium producer."

http://www.uranium1.com/about-us/#mission
Again, you failed to defend your statement: "... (show quote)


What I want to know is who has it now and how much are we talking about?

It's quite possible that some of it never left our shores, but some has. Enough for a dirty bomb?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.