buffalo wrote:
Try the NYTimes article about the FBI investigating trumpy being a Russian agent. All the moonbatty media reported as though it were true. But the truth is the FBI found NO evidence of trumpy being such. You moonbats with TDS are so obsessed with finding something on trumpy you will believe anything. And you know I am not a big fan of trumpy but I am a big fan of the truth no matter whose ass it chaps.
http://thefederalist.com/2017/02/06/16-fake-news-stories-reporters-have-run-since-trump-won/Try the NYTimes article about the FBI investigatin... (
show quote)
The wacko gets his facts from fake news the Federalist.
ome » Search » Federalist
Search Results for Federalist
Federalist Tribune
April 4, 2017
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to [...]
buffalo wrote:
PROVE IT, BOTTLE ASS!
BOTTLE ASS! That's a new one.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I was thinking we seem to go from one crisis to another while forgetting about past crisis' A lot depends on media attention and talking heads working people up..
Agreed.. One scandal after the other just to create diversion from one, moving on to another..m
I am glad to say more people now do question many articles and go in search of the truth...
lindajoy wrote:
Agreed.. One scandal after the other just to create diversion from one, moving on to another..m
I am glad to say more people now do question many articles and go in search of the truth...
In WND, Infowars and the Federalist.com.
Bad Bob wrote:
In WND, Infowars and the Federalist.com.
In all of them my friend.. I use that proverbial three strike rule and have now graduated it to include sensationalism in titles to catch your attention yet the article is not what the title suggests..
I figure if they have to do that with title the article must not be as said either...
Bad Bob wrote:
Show me some "fake" news Lj.
There are plenty CNN has been caught in to include having to correct them or retract.. Google it Bob you will see for yourself..
lindajoy wrote:
There are plenty CNN has been caught in to include having to correct them or retract.. Google it Bob you will see for yourself..
He doesn't do that. He tries to make others jump through hoops to prove something while he just posts silly irrelevant cartoons and pictures of himself.
lindajoy wrote:
There are plenty CNN has been caught in to include having to correct them or retract.. Google it Bob you will see for yourself..
I bet the Federalist has never made a correction or made a retract.
lindajoy wrote:
There are plenty CNN has been caught in to include having to correct them or retract.. Google it Bob you will see for yourself..
That's what I thought, nothing. Chase my BS.
lindajoy wrote:
In all of them my friend.. I use that proverbial three strike rule and have now graduated it to include sensationalism in titles to catch your attention yet the article is not what the title suggests..
I figure if they have to do that with title the article must not be as said either...
Bad boob doesn't understand...
The Federalist is a right leaning online OPINION magazine with a strong anti-gay bias.
In September 2013, co-founder Ben Domenech, a conservative writer and TV commentator, wrote that The Federalist was inspired by the worldview of the original TIME magazine, which he described as "[leaning] to the political right, with a small-c conservatism equipped with a populist respect for the middle class reader outside of New York and Washington, and an abiding love for America at a time when snark and cynicism were not considered substitutes for smart analysis."
The Federalist is an online magazine that covers politics, policy, culture, and religion. It was co-founded by Ben Domenech, a conservative writer and TV commentator, and Sean Davis. According to Domenech, the site has "a viewpoint that rejects the assumptions of the media establishment" and says it is dedicated to discussing "the philosophical underpinnings of the day's debate" instead of focusing on what he calls "the horserace or the personalities."
Bad Bob wrote:
I bet the Federalist has never made a correction or made a retract.
That's because unlike today's Democrats; they verify the information they impart before it is published, and they don't try to get away with "reshaping" the news for political purposes.
Lots to say about the benefits of a wall but it seems more of a bandaid type fix that doesn't correct the problem of why those people are coming here in caravans. Their home countries have become un livable for them apparently. Why not teach these people how to fight Give them arms and support hell send some of our troops with them and take their countries back from the gangs the corrupt police and politicians then help them set up a government and turn their homelands into a peaceful prosperous naion that they want to live in. The way it is now we give aid to dictators to prop them up and corrupt police who prey on the people rather than protect them. These people live in our hemisphere and it seems to me we need to strengthen all of the Americas so we don't have hoardes of desparate people fleeing to us that we just plain do not want here . My opinion is probably radical but say we do build the wall and they still come here it will be a failure.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Lots to say about the benefits of a wall but it seems more of a bandaid type fix that doesn't correct the problem of why those people are coming here in caravans. Their home countries have become un livable for them apparently. Why not teach these people how to fight Give them arms and support hell send some of our troops with them and take their countries back from the gangs the corrupt police and politicians then help them set up a government and turn their homelands into a peaceful prosperous naion that they want to live in. The way it is now we give aid to dictators to prop them up and corrupt police who prey on the people rather than protect them. These people live in our hemisphere and it seems to me we need to strengthen all of the Americas so we don't have hoardes of desparate people fleeing to us that we just plain do not want here . My opinion is probably radical but say we do build the wall and they still come here it will be a failure.
Lots to say about the benefits of a wall but it se... (
show quote)
Ah, more US spreading democracy and nation building for the benefit of the military industrial corporations and banksters.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.