Fact: In order to demand a "special counsel" investigation, you must have a 'suspected crime'. You cannot have an investigation 'in search of a crime' as this is. This makes the whole process a moot point as to whether or not it is even constitutional.
https://spectator.us/special-counsel-robert-s-mueller-iii/
fullspinzoo wrote:
Fact: In order to demand a "special counsel" investigation, you must have a 'suspected crime'. You cannot have an investigation 'in search of a crime' as this is. This makes the whole process a moot point as to whether or not it is even constitutional.
https://spectator.us/special-counsel-robert-s-mueller-iii/It must be something leaked by Comey to his buddy which was supposed to be what got the appointment of a special council, which said leaking is perfectly "normal" and"acceptable" according to Comey. What?????
fullspinzoo wrote:
Fact: In order to demand a "special counsel" investigation, you must have a 'suspected crime'. You cannot have an investigation 'in search of a crime' as this is. This makes the whole process a moot point as to whether or not it is even constitutional.
https://spectator.us/special-counsel-robert-s-mueller-iii/ I want to know when the grand jury is going to be put in place.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Fact: In order to demand a "special counsel" investigation, you must have a 'suspected crime'. You cannot have an investigation 'in search of a crime' as this is. This makes the whole process a moot point as to whether or not it is even constitutional.
https://spectator.us/special-counsel-robert-s-mueller-iii/It has NEVER been a legitimate investigation. Mueller is another Obama partisan appointee involved in the attempt to overturn the 2016 election Hillary couldn't cheat enough to win, even with Obama and his weaponized government agencies. I think it is the "insurance policy" Strzok and Page referred to in their texts.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.