son of witless wrote:
This still comes down to innocent until proven guilty. Something Liberals do not believe in. Blassey Ford did not prove her case, end of story. Liberals want Kavanaugh to prove he is innocent, which is impossible to do. Liberals demonstrated they do not believe in Constitutional protections once again. They just know by her demeanor that Ford told the truth and they just know by his demeanor that Kavanaugh has to be guilty.
The liberal lynch mob is dangerous and must never be given power.
This still comes down to innocent until proven gui... (
show quote)
So the lynch mob that acted in you personal approval was fine.
It was a personal opinion on the what Ford felt about the actions of Kavanaugh.
It was not sent to convict him.
It was in her personal view based on her true feeling that the public should be aware of he not be worthily of being in such a trust worthy position.
There was more than enough to raise the question of reasonable doubt.
In criminal cases reasonable reason to arrest people takes every day.
Then it becomes the judicial system that judges on the matter.
Engaging complete investigation of all information on people involved with actions mentioned at the time.
From the very start the right was saying the man was innocent of any wrong doing.
Ms Ford only want to raise the issue because of personal knowledge of action by Kavanaugh.
That he may not have the true qualifications & integrity to be appointed to the Supreme Court.
There was very little effort put in to seeking the real truth.
The key Mr. Judge who she pointed out early in her statement was never investigated with any real in what involvement he had with Kavanaugh at the time in question.
Judge wrote a book out lining what well have be just as collaborating information.
Information that is to the book buying public. even year book entries were ignored.
It is all public knowledge.
Our elected officials choose to ignore it all.
If there ever was a treasons act that was it.
It never was about being a criminal case.
It was about over looking the true qualification of a person to sit in judge of others.
To satisfy filling a position that may very well be used in judication of criminal crimes by select individuals involved in actions taking place now.
So you feel that any means to hide the truth from coming out.
Is fair even when actions are taken to cover the facts & keep the truth from others.
Well we have much that happens & much of what happen is hidden from the public.
Aiding in keeping truth hidden from the public is behind much of the problems we all see today.
But if I hide or you hide the truth from each other we will never be able to live side by side.
When it comes to personal actions that are or may be harm full to others.
Care must be taken for all information be shown.
If we hide information that covers a possible criminal act we are only abetting a criminal act.
When we allow public representatives entrusted to preserve & protect the lifes & well being of all.
The is no room for partisan politics.
There is to much wrong that comes with the might makes right way of doing things in the publics best interest.
.