bdamage Loc: My Bunker

I've been saying all along that she may never testify due to it being just all made up.

Hearing in Doubt? Christine Ford’s Lawyer Rips Senate Plan to Have Prosecutor Ask Questions: Not ‘Fair and Respectful’
by Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Sep 24th, 2018, 10:00 pm

https://www.mediaite.com/online/hearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful/

This whole thing is still one big joke.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

They want the picture of her being grilled by old white guys. They won't get it.

Robert Harrington

Yes you are right...the 11 gutless white guys have no balls. That’s ok...if you had a daughter that this happened to you might think a little differently. The world is passing you by.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

10 Serious Problems With New Accusations Against Kavanaugh
https://www.dailywire.com/authors/ryan-saavedra

The New Yorker published new accusations on Sunday from a second woman who alleges that Judge Brett Kavanaugh acted sexually inappropriate towards her at a party during their college years.

Deborah Ramirez, 53, alleges that while she was at a Yale party, intoxicated to the point that she was on the ground in a "foggy" state "slurring" her words, Kavanaugh pulled his pants down and exposed himself to her.

The New Yorker report and a subsequent report from The New York Times both raise multiple red flags about the credibility of the allegations. Here are 10 key points compiled from both reports that raise serious questions about the claims:

1. The New Yorker could not find a single witness who could put Kavanaugh at the alleged party.

Buried more than 1,000 words into the report, Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer wrote:

The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.

2. The New York Times could not find a single person who could corroborate Ramirez's claims.

The New York Times likewise could not find a single witness to backup her allegations:

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge.

3. The man accused of egging on Kavanaugh denied Ramirez's allegations and vouched for Kavanaugh's character.

Buried more than 1,400 words into The New Yorker story, Farrow and Mayer provide a quote from one of the men named by Ramirez:

One of the male classmates who Ramirez said egged on Kavanaugh denied any memory of the party. "I don’t think Brett would flash himself to Debbie, or anyone, for that matter," he said. Asked why he thought Ramirez was making the allegation, he responded, "I have no idea." The other male classmate who Ramirez said was involved in the incident commented, "I have zero recollection."

4. A third person that Ramirez claimed was at the party says she was not there for the alleged incident.

The classmate, who was not named, said that "she was not present at the incident."

5. Ramirez contacted her former classmates, asking about the incident, and admitted she was not sure that Kavanaugh was the male who exposed himself.

The Times' report states:

Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

6. A woman who claims she was "best friends" with Ramirez says Ramirez never mentioned the story and initially said her friend's accusations against Kavanaugh might be "politically motivated."

Buried nearly 1,700 words into the New Yorker piece, the report states:.....

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

If my daughter comes forward with something like this 36 years after she claimed it happened, with zero evidence what so ever; first of all I'd be in my 90's and second, if I was able, Id tell her to go to counseling and let it go. By her own description, it wasn't a rape. No one can place Kavanaugh there and she was drunk off her butt, thus her memory of it is totally in question. Add to that she's a lefty looney by the accounts of her students.

This and the other one are total smear jobs and it should be criminal.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I just read your comment on a different thread. I'm wondering how much the DNC and democrats et al are paying for all this. I'd bet they have a deal with Avenatti; do anything however scrupulous, to stop this confirmation and we will cover your debts.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

A patoff?
Maybe.
Will it show up on her income taxes.

Robert Harrington

Let’s settle this...let the FBI investigate all parties under oath. You know it’s a crime to lie to the FBI. What is anyone afraid of. “The truth”!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Ah, that's a good question!

moldyoldy

The GOP will vote on Friday morning. They want to get it over with before more witnesses show up.

acknowledgeurma

If it shows up on her income taxes, we won't know, unless she runs for President and promises to show her tax returns. Oh wait, never-mind.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

I think the most important question to be asked the accuser is;
What was your motive?
The timing is the clue to all of this.

acknowledgeurma

What do you think would be the motive of someone who believes they would have been rape had they not escaped? What would your motive be, if this happened to you, and your attacker was about to join the SCOTUS. I assume your motive would be a desire to stop the perversion of justice.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Or , she is just a Democrat activist, trying to subvert the process.

acknowledgeurma

What process is that, the process of putting a Republican activist on SCOTUS?