Question for Trump supporters.
byronglimish wrote:
Yes he's definitely on the spectrum.
Indeed.
nesty also stated that you used "insults" when you posted about his "twin", djrich.
That's kinda odd. Why would he consider that as an insult as opposed to a compliment?
Airforceone wrote:
Just can’t handle the facts can you and you use insults to justify stupidity in the the White House.
Every topic you post is laced with insults, and you seem to take any disagreement, or counterpoint as an insult, then respond with insults.
It is my considered opinion that you need to look at yourself before denigrating your betters.
archie bunker wrote:
Every topic you post is laced with insults, and you seem to take any disagreement, or counterpoint as an insult, then respond with insults.
It is my considered opinion that you need to look at yourself before denigrating your betters.
Moreover, every topic xe posts is laced with spelling and grammatical errors.
This is not an educated person.
bdamage wrote:
Yeah nesty, you're one to talk.
You conveniently bypass all the "facts" I post here due to you not being able to debunk the truth.
Keep up the good work of showing your ignorance and hypocrisy though....at least you're consistent in that respect.
What the hell are you talking about people like you are easy to debunk I either missed you’re post or it was so stupid it did not require any type of response. When Trump supporters use there conspiracy theorist in lieu of facts it should be ignored.
4430
Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
archie bunker wrote:
Every topic you post is laced with insults, and you seem to take any disagreement, or counterpoint as an insult, then respond with insults.
It is my considered opinion that you need to look at yourself before denigrating your betters.
I told him he needed to practice what he preached !
Airforceone wrote:
What the hell are you talking about people like you are easy to debunk I either missed you’re post or it was so stupid it did not require any type of response. When Trump supporters use there conspiracy theorist in lieu of facts it should be ignored.
Yet more proof of Mikeyavelli's point. AF1 is a certified incompetent, opinionated but clever? Never!
4430 wrote:
I told him he needed to practice what he preached !
He can't do it. He won't do it. I think he has a lot of anger pent up for whatever reason, and he lashes out at us. Maybe even a drinking problem.
On a happier note, striped bass is some of the best fish I've ever eaten!
Good stuff, Maynard!
Airforceone wrote:
What the hell are you talking about people like you are easy to debunk I either missed youâre post or it was so stupid it did not require any type of response. When Trump supporters use there conspiracy theorist in lieu of facts it should be ignored.
Not once have you EVER debunked anything I've ever posted.
But instead, just ridiculed using opinion and insults.
So obvious you are.
How can anyone take you seriously when you are in support of the following?
bdamage wrote:
Not once have you EVER debunked anything I've ever posted.
But instead, just ridiculed using opinion and insults.
So obvious you are.
How can anyone take you seriously when you are in support of the following?
I don't think that the kommiecrats like Wall Street either.
CDM
Loc: Florida
son of witless wrote:
If the Trump economy has legs that will do much to convert flaming Marxists into regular Americans. Jimmy Carter and then the Reagan economy did an awful lot to change post Watergate College Liberals into Conservatives. If Pelosi and her plague of locusts take over this fall, that will not be good for the economy and might stall the natural evolution of young idiots into normals.
I believe Trump's efforts have already drawn a significant number of left-leaners. I think they helped us get him elected as in nobody knows what happens in the voting booth. That said, we have to be concerned that these same people in as great or greater numbers show up at the polls in November. Historically conservatives become stupid and lazy when things are good thinking the battle is won.
Even if it's true that the economy is the primary driver in elections we still have never been up against such a monumentally desperate, corrupt entity as this Progressive Democrat Party and their proletariat.
CDM wrote:
I believe Trump's efforts have already drawn a significant number of left-leaners. I think they helped us get him elected as in nobody knows what happens in the voting booth. That said, we have to be concerned that these same people in as great or greater numbers show up at the polls in November. Historically conservatives become stupid and lazy when things are good thinking the battle is won.
Even if it's true that the economy is the primary driver in elections we still have never been up against such a monumentally desperate, corrupt entity as this Progressive Democrat Party and their proletariat.
I believe Trump's efforts have already drawn a sig... (
show quote)
History is always our guide. But history repeats in different ways. We can only hope that if Pelosi becomes Speaker that her majority is so razor thin that she cannot do much damage. However, history also shows that from time to time you get Black Swan Events. There is still hope that the Republicans hold the House. If not, then we will deal with it.
CDM
Loc: Florida
bdamage wrote:
Yes the word "liberal" was hijacked by the leftist, or should I say instead, "carjacked", since it is used then discarded like a tampon.
In my day the "classic liberal" was as against the leftist global elites as was anyone who cherished our Constitution and would fight for those rights.
They keep changing the name and unfortunately many are buying into this deception.
The common root here is the Latin 'communis' – common or shared - The underlying structure is the collective; communal and sharing at the same level of participation (except for the hierarchy who are without exception always wealthy).
Totally contrary to human nature. As history has shown virtually impossible to force on the self reliant individual. Hence the need for deceptive descriptors, continual lying and ultimately violence (as we are witnessing first hand today in our country) to force acquiescence. It's important to be aware that communism, in whatever form, is always desperate and always ready to be violent. Hardly a 'liberal' trait I think.
No matter how they choose to camouflage it, Liberal, Socialist, Democrat, Progressive, etc., the core philosophy is communism; controlled distribution of wealth, elimination of individuality and complete control of 'freedoms' …
Our constitution and communism, in any form, cannot exist in the same environment for more reasons than we can discuss here. They are violently antithetical to one another on so many levels.
So they can call it what they like; it looks like the same pile of dog sh*t to you, me and millions of other Americans.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.