One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A serious question... why?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Nov 5, 2016 11:27:05   #
Big Bass
 
Kevyn wrote:
Trump is owned by the Russians, the closest we have ever come to a true Manchurian candidate. He has no allegiance to anyone but himself and his co conspiritors. There is no evidence that Clinton allowed state secrets to be leaked, only that she used private email for some of her communication the same way as Colon Powell and Condi Rice not to mention most of the Bush Administration including Cheney, Libby and Rumsfeld. At worst a lapse in judgement.

With that kind of thinking, your brain should belong to the Smithsonian.

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 11:43:58   #
bestpal38 Loc: Cedar City, Utah
 
I have always wondered this, whether it be Republican or demoncrat. But it is especially true this year, with our jetsetter in chief, out there burning up jet fuel like crazy. If he wants to campaign for the bitch, fine, just do it on your dime, or hers. We know she has plenty.

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 11:49:33   #
Headsup
 
If you stop to read any of his posts, be sure you have a barf bag in reach. Basically he is most likely in his teens just throwing out nonsense to watch the responses. If you don't want to get involved with his nonsense, just pass over it.

There are good threads of common sense but mostly it's ranting…. Just be sure when responding to any of the threads, have facts and sites for them. Many just spew hear say. Have fun and enjoy the site.


Mr Bombastic wrote:
This is the first reply I've seen by you, and it's more than enough for me to conclude that you are an imbecile. Anyone disagree?

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2016 12:23:29   #
jelun
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
This is the first reply I've seen by you, and it's more than enough for me to conclude that you are an imbecile. Anyone disagree?




A new phony entity?

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 12:35:56   #
Mr Bombastic
 
jelun wrote:
A new phony entity?


What is that supposed to mean?

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 12:45:53   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
In a nutshell.... paranoid conspiracy theorist... in the past there were individuals who had more than one persona on OPP... but, with the new upgrade to the system, it is no longer possible. New member's IP are scanned and compared, those attempting to have more than one log on are declined and banned. Funny bit of info, those that had multiple personalities... were.... you guessed it .... Liberals!

Mr Bombastic wrote:
What is that supposed to mean?

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 12:48:54   #
Big Bass
 
Pennylynn wrote:
In a nutshell.... paranoid conspiracy theorist... in the past there were individuals who had more than one persona on OPP... but, with the new upgrade to the system, it is no longer possible. New member's IP are scanned and compared, those attempting to have more than one log on are declined and banned. Funny bit of info, those that had multiple personalities... were.... you guessed it .... Liberals!


There are still a few, like progressive 1 and jelun.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2016 12:51:35   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I guess the software is not perfect.... there are always the scorpion that gets through the cracks! Thanks for the reminder...

Big Bass wrote:
There are still a few, like progressive 1 and jelun.



Reply
Nov 5, 2016 13:04:04   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Kevie is not the sharpest tool in the obama/killary's tool shed... but he is a tool!


Kevyn is the product of being beaten with an idiot stick!

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 13:07:31   #
Mr Bombastic
 
Pennylynn wrote:
In a nutshell.... paranoid conspiracy theorist... in the past there were individuals who had more than one persona on OPP... but, with the new upgrade to the system, it is no longer possible. New member's IP are scanned and compared, those attempting to have more than one log on are declined and banned. Funny bit of info, those that had multiple personalities... were.... you guessed it .... Liberals!


I might be in trouble then. I use wifi for my internet. Hope no one else uses the same ones.

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 13:14:24   #
Big dog
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Kevie is not the sharpest tool in the obama/killary's tool shed... but he is a tool!


A dull rusty tool that was deliberately left out in the rain to rust away.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2016 13:17:20   #
BBZ Loc: Long Island, NY
 
Good question for Chris Christie - I will call him right now from the ledge he is on.

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 14:38:45   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
WiFi is safe.... it is a software handshake that is traceable. I am a computer engineer, and this may be a little tecky... but I will try to make it easy. Although you are on a wifi, your computer, laptop, iphone, or other device has a protocol... an instruction, you log on and then access the web... your system sends a string of code to your service provider ... inside that code is a address of sorts which is a 9 digit code. That code is sent to your server (COX, Century Link, Starnet, or whatever services you rent), that server contacts the address you are trying to reach, say OPP. Your server announces its intent, like a "hi, can I come in?" Using its own protocols with your address added. The server your system asks also has a string of programming... and it looks at its instructions... and its protocols....and says yes or no. Those protocols are set up by the system administrator....so, lets say that the administrator doses not want a ttp running across his system, so he blocks TTP... and lets say he added a list of forbidden addresses... and your address is one of the forbidden, then you will get of 404 code... server not available. So it is server to server talk... not your wifi home address that sends and receives the handshake, but you are introduced by your server to the home you are visiting. Even if someone used your wifi, they are still using their own device... and that device has the embedded protocol...

So... don't worry about sharing your wifi....
Mr Bombastic wrote:
I might be in trouble then. I use wifi for my internet. Hope no one else uses the same ones.

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 14:53:29   #
Jesuslovesme1
 
I agree with you. He is am imbecile if he Trump is bad. Hillary is bad ...very bad

Reply
Nov 5, 2016 15:00:03   #
mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
This is the first reply I've seen by you, and it's more than enough for me to conclude that you are an imbecile. Anyone disagree?


No No No No No and NO! Of course you are giving imbeciles a bad name.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.