One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This Kind Of Thing Just Makes Me Trigger-happy.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 21, 2016 14:22:07   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 14:39:16   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)


I'm with you. Never thought I'd see this kind of thing in America. Where do they get these judges and what on earth are they thinking.....Thinking, that's it!!!! They're NOT!

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 15:03:53   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)










The radical Marx/Alinsky regime, LtL, are now going completely bonkers. Completely bonkers. They had NO idea whatsoever that their "fundamental t***sformation" of America would EVER end. Hillary was to be a 3rd term of their "Messiah," {in "d**g"}, on steroids, and there would be NOTHING that patriotic conservative Constitutionalist, Bible and gun-clinging Americans could do about it ever again. NOTHING. Oh, bad luck Cynthia!!! FAT CHANCE!!! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!!! "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AND SAFE AGAIN!!!" Now; "DRAIN THAT {RADICAL SECULAR LIBERAL "REGRESSIVE" LEFTY} SWAMP!!!"

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2016 15:57:15   #
Big dog
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)


If you see a cock in the women's room, remove it. The person can STAY

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 16:06:47   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Big dog wrote:
If you see a cock in the women's room, remove it. The person can STAY


Who gets to pay for that "surgery"? Sure as hell, not me.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 16:20:53   #
Big dog
 
oldroy wrote:
Who gets to pay for that "surgery"? Sure as hell, not me.

I never mentioned surgery, how's about slamming it in the door.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 16:35:58   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
Big dog wrote:
If you see a cock in the women's room, remove it. The person can STAY


Oooohh! Larry Likey!

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2016 16:42:57   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Larry, The founding fathers were a group of brilliant men, but lets not forget that they were imperfect as we all are. They were all property owners, white, and many were s***e holders. They fought for those things. Democracy started to come about in the 1820s as people moved west. There was no such thing as universal suffrage, civil rights, or e******y, that came a bit later.
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 16:51:49   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Larry, The founding fathers were a group of brilliant men, but lets not forget that they were imperfect as we all are. They were all property owners, white, and many were s***e holders. They fought for those things. Democracy started to come about in the 1820s as people moved west. There was no such thing as universal suffrage, civil rights, or e******y, that came a bit later.
America was not founded as a democracy.

Educate yourself:

James Madison, Property

29 Mar. 1792 Papers 14:266--68

This term in its particular application means "that d******n which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."

In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.

In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.

In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.

He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.

He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.

He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.

Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.

Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause.

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, wh**ever is his own.

According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property.

More sparingly should this praise be allowed to a government, where a man's religious rights are violated by penalties, or fettered by tests, or taxed by a hierarchy. Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man's house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man's conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most compleat despotism.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials!

A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities.

If there be a government then which p***es itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States.

If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 17:26:52   #
Big dog
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
America was not founded as a democracy.

Educate yourself:

James Madison, Property

29 Mar. 1792 Papers 14:266--68

This term in its particular application means "that d******n which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."

In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.

In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.

In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.

He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.

He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.

He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.

Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.

Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause.

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, wh**ever is his own.

According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property.

More sparingly should this praise be allowed to a government, where a man's religious rights are violated by penalties, or fettered by tests, or taxed by a hierarchy. Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man's house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man's conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most compleat despotism.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials!

A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities.

If there be a government then which p***es itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States.

If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.
America was not founded as a democracy. br br Ed... (show quote)

And your point is......?

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 17:51:10   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Big dog wrote:
And your point is......?
Right over your head . . .

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2016 17:58:23   #
Big dog
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Right over your head . . .


Sorry, now I see.
I thought we were discussing weirdos in bathrooms.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 19:36:25   #
Sons of Liberty Loc: look behind you!
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)

The fricken mayor from Cleveland looks like a peter puffer. No wonder he'd sign something like this. I'm in the mood to pop some caps myself after reading this s**t.



Reply
Dec 21, 2016 19:39:58   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
EL wrote:
I'm with you. Never thought I'd see this kind of thing in America. Where do they get these judges and what on earth are they thinking.....Thinking, that's it!!!! They're NOT!

They were appointed by democrats.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 23:55:10   #
KiraSeer2016
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most l*****t jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/t*********r_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'h**e crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)


Death of a culture.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.