One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Pressure on the DOJ to Indict~Hillary Lies Fall On Deaf Ears Or Do They?
Page <<first <prev 18 of 19 next>
Jun 24, 2016 10:20:30   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Docadhoc wrote:
TD, I read the 83 page IG report and based on that alone she is guilty of 3 counts of espionage each carrying up to 10 years in a federal pen, and one of those counts could carry the death penalty.

We all have a horse in this race and all want our horse to win, but she is guilty and not fit to be president.


The British are waking up too!! Exit EU
The Banksters/Bbilderbergers/Banksters will be doing their dirty work to fight the movement for independence from the NWO.
Hillary's comrade's warning below.
They just pooped their Pampers.

George Soros (Bilderberger): EU exit risks ‘black Friday’
***** June 20, 2016 ***** in News by Slad
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/george-soros-eu-exit-risks-black-friday/
Exclusive: Currency speculator warns devaluation would mean more disruption than when UK dropped out of ERM in 1992

The world’s most famous currency speculator has warned that a v**e on Thursday for Britain to leave the EU would trigger a bigger and more damaging fall for sterling than the day he forced Britain out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism almost a quarter of a century ago.
George Soros, writing in the Guardian, said a Brexit v**e would spark a ‘black Friday’ for the UK, but the devaluation of sterling would bring none of the benefits to the economy that it enjoyed after it dropped out of the ERM on 16 September 1992 – Black Wednesday….

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 10:26:00   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
tdsrnest wrote:
How can you be dealing with facts before the FBI report comes out. You've listen to so much BS you would not know the facts. There's been 50 conspiracy theories posted on OPP all different. Your problem is you h**e the Clintons so you don't want facts you want conspiracies that fall along your ideology of h**e. Your a disgrace


Have you seen a sample of the emails that Snowdan and that other guy, (name escapes me right now)has and that have been released ??Donations list of Clinton in the millions by name and state?? How about the one marked "SECRET" right on the top page identifying countries and concerns to work on?? It isn't just listening, although I don't know how you can separate that when forming an opinion, its also seeing, verifying and evaluating that information...You have to have seen the very things I'm speaking of and then remember Hillary's lies over it all......Do you believe her "foundation" is on the up and up and if so why is money laundered through Canada and then into their accounts?? How about the names that "contributed on that one? See how many are Middle East country representative?? Why on earth would they be "contributing to this Clinton Foundation???

Does it all seem on the up and up to you?? Just answer that question, please..

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 10:37:50   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
lindajoy wrote:
Have you seen a sample of the emails that Snowdan and that other guy, (name escapes me right now)has and that have been released ??Donations list of Clinton in the millions by name and state?? How about the one marked "SECRET" right on the top page identifying countries and concerns to work on?? It isn't just listening, although I don't know how you can separate that when forming an opinion, its also seeing, verifying and evaluating that information...You have to have seen the very things I'm speaking of and then remember Hillary's lies over it all......Do you believe her "foundation" is on the up and up and if so why is money laundered through Canada and then into their accounts?? How about the names that "contributed on that one? See how many are Middle East country representative?? Why on earth would they be "contributing to this Clinton Foundation???

Does it all seem on the up and up to you?? Just answer that question, please..
Have you seen a sample of the emails that Snowdan ... (show quote)


There will be no answer.
There is no legitimate answer for being so blind.

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2016 10:55:40   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
eagleye13 wrote:
There will be no answer.
There is no legitimate answer for being so blind.


Most likely not, but we can try, righttt??

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 11:07:25   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Right!
There are others to wake up also.
Never give up ship!!! :-)

lindajoy wrote:
Most likely not, but we can try, righttt??

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 11:12:09   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Right!
There are others to wake up also.
Never give up ship!!! :-)


Yes there are and all we can is try~~

Nope, not ever giving up, period..To give up is to die..While we all do I'll not help it along......

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 11:33:52   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
eagleye13 wrote:
There will be no answer.
There is no legitimate answer for being so blind.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Truer words have never been spoken!!

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2016 11:44:15   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
lindajoy wrote:
Have you seen a sample of the emails that Snowdan and that other guy, (name escapes me right now)has and that have been released ??Donations list of Clinton in the millions by name and state?? How about the one marked "SECRET" right on the top page identifying countries and concerns to work on?? It isn't just listening, although I don't know how you can separate that when forming an opinion, its also seeing, verifying and evaluating that information...You have to have seen the very things I'm speaking of and then remember Hillary's lies over it all......Do you believe her "foundation" is on the up and up and if so why is money laundered through Canada and then into their accounts?? How about the names that "contributed on that one? See how many are Middle East country representative?? Why on earth would they be "contributing to this Clinton Foundation???

Does it all seem on the up and up to you?? Just answer that question, please..
Have you seen a sample of the emails that Snowdan ... (show quote)


Lindajoy-you will not receive a cogent answer from the Clinton's lap dog. Td is on Hillary's bandwagon and is too stupid to get off. The Clintons routed the money through Canada because under Canadian Law the names of the donors do not have to be or cannot be divulged. In either case, it is another means by which the Clintons can sell access and hide their t*****rous acts from the American public. I would bet that they are receiving millions from some foreign leaders whom we regard as enemies of the USA. The Clintons typify the ideal democrat, crooked and shady. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 11:47:08   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Yep Ricko
The British are waking up too!! Exit EU
Now the Dems and more R's need to wake up.

Ricko wrote:
Lindajoy-you will not receive a cogent answer from the Clinton's lap dog. Td is on Hillary's bandwagon and is too stupid to get off. The Clintons routed the money through Canada because under Canadian Law the names of the donors do not have to be or cannot be divulged. In either case, it is another means by which the Clintons can sell access and hide their t*****rous acts from the American public. I would bet that they are receiving millions from some foreign leaders whom we regard as enemies of the USA. The Clintons typify the ideal democrat, crooked and shady. Good Luck America !!!
Lindajoy-you will not receive a cogent answer from... (show quote)


The British are waking up too!! Exit EU
“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack" – Richard Gardner ,
Ambassador to Italy - quoted in (CFR)Foreign Affairs, April, 1974
“Actions at the multinational level will be needed, if the process of international relocation of industries is to be accelerated in an organized fashion….”
TC Report #23, 1982

The Banksters/Bbilderbergers/Banksters will be doing their dirty work to fight the movement for independence.
They just pooped their Pampers.

George Soros (Bilderberger): EU exit risks ‘black Friday’
***** June 20, 2016 ***** in News by Slad
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/george-soros-eu-exit-risks-black-friday/
Exclusive: Currency speculator warns devaluation would mean more disruption than when UK dropped out of ERM in 1992
George Soros says there would be little the Bank of England could do if Brexit led to a recession. Photograph: Luke Macgregor/Reuters


The world’s most famous currency speculator has warned that a v**e on Thursday for Britain to leave the EU would trigger a bigger and more damaging fall for sterling than the day he forced Britain out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism almost a quarter of a century ago.
George Soros, writing in the Guardian, said a Brexit v**e would spark a ‘black Friday’ for the UK, but the devaluation of sterling would bring none of the benefits to the economy that it enjoyed after it dropped out of the ERM on 16 September 1992 – Black Wednesday….
More:
David Cameron’s Tea Party ProblemAuthor: Sebastian Mallaby, Paul A. Volcker Senior Fellow for International Economics
A Foreign Affairs article ***** February 4, 2016
A Foreign Affairs article

Washington Post
http://www.cfr.org/united-kingdom/david-camerons-tea-party-problem/p37520
The United States is not the only place possessed by populism, and this week the results from Iowa coincided with a new lurch toward the gutter in formerly sane Britain. The country once governed by Bill Clinton-imitating centrists is now beset by its own version of Trump-Cruzery: a xenophobic nativism that would divorce Britain from Europe in defiance of ordinary good sense. For most of postwar history, the fact that U.S. and British politics have often marched in parallel has cemented the Western alliance and underpinned the global order. Now it’s an embarrassment…..
More:
David Cameron’s Dangerous Game / The Folly of Flirting With an EU Exit
Foreign Affairs/CFR - Their “Warning” *****September/October 2013 ******
Author: Matthias Matthijs

Foreign Affairs
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/139641/matthias-matthijs/david-camerons-dangerous-game
http://www.cfr.org/politics-and-strategy/david-camerons-dangerous-game/p31309
“Despite his innate caution and usually sound political instincts, British Prime Minister David Cameron is gambling with his country's future. In January, in a long-anticipated speech, he called for a wide-ranging renegotiation of the terms of the United Kingdom's membership in the European Union and promised to put the result up for a straight in-or-out popular referendum by the end of 2017 (assuming his party wins the next e******n, due in 2015).”
A British exit from the EU is now more likely than ever -- and it would be disastrous not only for the United Kingdom but also for the rest of Europe and the United States.
If London does ultimately cut the rope, it will not be the result of rational political or economic calculations….
The PTB just pooped their Pampers.
Be aware of what they will be up to. Sabotaging economies?
Try to keep an eye on them. The MSM will be giving their spin

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 11:58:03   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
OOOOPS!!! Little by little the b***h clinton's lies and obfuscation of her illegal private in-home SERVER to escape the laws and regulations and avoid any scrutiny that might expose her fraudulent and criminal activities while SOS is coming unraveled. LOL!!! Hope the b***h goes down and is never heard of or seen again. It won't come soon enough!!!

Could this ONE email guarantee a Clinton indictment?

JUNE 24, 2016

It’s the one email Hillary Clinton didn’t want the world to see — and it could be the final nail in her coffin.

A new report has revealed that Clinton failed to turn over a copy of a key message involving problems caused by her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday. The disclosure calls into question what other work-related emails may have been deleted by Clinton.

Critics have accused her of intentionally deleting those emails to hide her illegal activities. This new email revelation adds serious credibility to that claim — right at the apex of an FBI investigation.

The new email was included within messages exchanged Nov. 13, 2010, between Clinton and one of her closest aides, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. At the time, emails sent from Clinton’s BlackBerry device and routed through her private clintonemail.com server in the basement of her New York home were being blocked by the State Department’s spam filter. A suggested remedy was for Clinton to obtain a state.gov email account.

“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible,” Clinton responded to Abedin.

Clinton never used a government account that was set up for her, instead continuing to rely on her private server until leaving office.

The email was not among the tens of thousands of emails Clinton turned over to the agency in response to public records lawsuits seeking copies of her official correspondence. Abedin, who also used a private account on Clinton’s server, provided a copy from her own inbox after the State Department asked her to return any work-related emails. That copy of the email was publicly cited last month in a blistering audit by the State Department’s inspector general that concluded Clinton and her team ignored clear internal guidance that her email setup violated federal standards and could have left sensitive material vulnerable to hackers.

“While this exchange was not part of the approximately 55,000 pages provided to the State Department by former Secretary Clinton, the exchange was included within the set of documents Ms. Abedin provided the department in response to our March 2015 request,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told The Associated Press on Thursday.

The November 2010 email was among documents released under court order Wednesday to the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch, which has sued the State Department over access to public records related to the presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee’s service as the nation’s top diplomat between 2009 and 2013. The case is one of about three dozen lawsuits over access to records related to Clinton.

Before turning over her emails to the department for review and potential public release, Clinton and her lawyers withheld thousands of additional emails she said were clearly personal, such as those involving what she described as “planning Chelsea’s wedding or my mother’s funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends as well as yoga routines, family vacations.”

Clinton has never outlined in detail what criteria she and her lawyers used to determine which emails to release and which to delete, but her 2010 email with Abedin appears clearly work-related under the State Department’s own criteria for agency records under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.

Dozens of the emails sent or received by Clinton through her private server were later determined to contain classified material. The FBI has been investigating for months whether Clinton’s use of the private email server imperiled government secrets. Agents recently interviewed several of Clinton’s top aides, including Abedin.

As part of the probe, Clinton turned over the hard drive from her email server to the FBI. It had been wiped clean, and Clinton has said she did not keep copies of the emails she choose to withhold.

On Wednesday, lawyers from Judicial Watch, a conservative legal organization, questioned under oath Bryan Pagliano, the computer technician who set up Clinton’s private server. A transcript released Thursday shows Pagliano repeatedly responded to detailed questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, as he did last year before a congressional committee.

Dozens of questions Pagiliano declined to answer included who paid for the system, whether there was technical help to support its users and who else at the State Department used email accounts on it. Pagliano also would not answer whether he discussed setting up a home server with Clinton prior to her tenure as secretary of state, according to the transcript.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the November 2010 email cited in the inspector general audit was one of more than a dozen work-related emails that his group identified that Clinton sent or received but later failed to turn over the State Department.

“Contrary to her statement under oath suggesting otherwise, Mrs. Clinton did not return all her government emails to the State Department,” Fitton said. “Our goal is to find out what other emails Mrs. Clinton and the State Department are hiding.”

The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Reply
Jun 24, 2016 22:37:45   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And unless I am mistaken, even ONE of those counts found guilty on, Constitutionally prevents her from holding any federal public office. THAT's one reason they are d**gging it out, that and to hope the issue dies on the vine. They're doing all they can to destroy all of us.


I believe if she is indicted she can still run but the next step may stop her.

Arraignment.

Reply
 
 
Jun 24, 2016 23:12:22   #
Airforceone
 
Docadhoc wrote:
TD, I read the 83 page IG report and based on that alone she is guilty of 3 counts of espionage each carrying up to 10 years in a federal pen, and one of those counts could carry the death penalty.

We all have a horse in this race and all want our horse to win, but she is guilty and not fit to be president.


That's not true that's your perception. There's nothing in that report that even remotely had anything to do with espionage. Who the was she spying on and who did she sell the secrets to.

Reply
Jun 25, 2016 04:00:16   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
tdsrnest wrote:
That's not true that's your perception. There's nothing in that report that even remotely had anything to do with espionage. Who the was she spying on and who did she sell the secrets to.


If you think that, you truly do not understand the ramifications of the Espionage Act. I've already cited two clauses she is in violation of and there may be a third. Spying is a very small portion of the act. She is mandated by law to a certain standard of security, to which she refused to comply. If in fact she was hacjed, there are more violatiins to be filed. Are you aware that she says she can't remember signing the papers that bind every person with any level of security clearance? Are you aware that ignorance is not a defense? Are you aware that the division responsible for that paper is the one she was head of, but she can't remember it?.

Read the act. Then read the IG report.

Reply
Jun 25, 2016 04:08:31   #
fullspinzoo
 
Docadhoc wrote:
If you think that, you truly do not understand the ramifications of the Espionage Act. I've already cited two clauses she is in violation of and there may be a third. Spying is a very small portion of the act. She is mandated by law to a certain standard of security, to which she refused to comply. If in fact she was hacjed, there are more violatiins to be filed. Are you aware that she says she can't remember signing the papers that bind every person with any level of security clearance? Are you aware that ignorance is not a defense? Are you aware that the division responsible for that paper is the one she was head of, but she can't remember it?.

Read the act. Then read the IG report.
If you think that, you truly do not understand the... (show quote)

There is one email in which Mrs. Clinton says to one of her underlings: "I want that document that says 'secret' on it. White-out the word 'secret' and fax it to me from your home fax to my home fax." That is an intention to remove a state secret from a secure location to a non-secure location. What is that called? Espionage.

Reply
Jun 25, 2016 04:12:49   #
fullspinzoo
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
There is one email in which Mrs. Clinton says to one of her underlings: "I want that document that says 'secret' on it. White-out the word 'secret' and fax it to me from your home fax to my home fax." That is an intention to remove a state secret from a secure location to a non-secure location. What is that called? Espionage.

Hillary committed a felony according to this article. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/28/1416309/-Hillary-Clinton-s-Felony-The-federal-laws-violated-by-the-private-server

Reply
Page <<first <prev 18 of 19 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.