Why cant democrats respect taxpayers or their dollars? With the sequester in place government agencies spent massive amounts just before the end of September to avoid losing increases...

joe1941

With the sequester in place government agencies spent massive amounts just before the end of September to avoid losing increases in their budget. Why do the democrats want to end sequester when its working and reducing federal spending without hurting any agency?

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

joe1941 wrote:

With the sequester in place government agencies spent massive amounts just before the end of September to avoid losing increases in their budget. Why do the democrats want to end sequester when its working and reducing federal spending without hurting any agency?

It's not about sequester, that's just a drop in the bucket, it's all about political power. The l*****ts could care less about this country, they only care about their own political power. And, they will destroy the whole country while seeking it!

bahmer

OldSchool wrote:

It's not about sequester, that's just a drop in the bucket, it's all about political power. The l*****ts could care less about this country, they only care about their own political power. And, they will destroy the whole country while seeking it!

Amen, they don't care about poor or needy people all they care about is power. They don't care about the b****s or the hispanics all they care about is power and the healthcare bill is about taking one sixth of the economy and putting it under the democrats wing of power nothing more nothing less.

JimMe

DemLib-Socialists want to end Sequestering because IT'S WORKING WITHOUT HURTING ANY AGENCIES... They can't allow less spending to become "the Norm"... It's not in their Nature...

trucksterbud

joe1941 wrote:

With the sequester in place government agencies spent massive amounts just before the end of September to avoid losing increases in their budget. Why do the democrats want to end sequester when its working and reducing federal spending without hurting any agency?

The massive amounts of money shifting and changing hands is all it takes to move and shake Washington, DISTRICT OF CRIMINALS. The real motive behind ObamaCare is the massive amount of profit involved as key inside government players (wouldn't be surprised to learn Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have massive holdings in the insurance companies) have the opportunity to use taxpayer monies to create profit that they don't show the taxpayer. The ACA is not about having insurance, its about creating massive profit for a few government insiders - Obama included. Do you think that if they profit from it they will offset your federal income tax (unconstitutional in the first place) by one penny..?? Of course not. Again, check the two links below to learn the t***h.

Attached file:
(Download)

Attached file:
(Download)

TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon

Both sides are to blame on that one, both parties have acted like heroin addicts spending money on their habits.

There are four ways to spend money.
1) you can spend your own money on yourself which means you will look for the best quality and the best price
2) You can spend you own money on someone else many not look for the best quality, but the best price.
3) You can spend someone else's money on yourself [I] the best quality, not concerned with price.
4) You can spend someone else's money on someone else little concern for quality or price

The Gov't falls into number 4.

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

joe1941 wrote:

With the sequester in place government agencies spent massive amounts just before the end of September to avoid losing increases in their budget. Why do the democrats want to end sequester when its working and reducing federal spending without hurting any agency?

VILE Liberals respect NOTHING not even themselves!