timmh67 Loc: USA...West Coast

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), who has been rumored as being considered to replace Janet Napolitano to head the Department of Homeland Security, used some very strange language earlier this week to characterize a sentiment for a clean resolution to end the government shutdown. She labeled it a form of "martial law."

Yes, we have heard Ms. Lee say some whimsical and ridiculous things in her time in office, which I'm sure embarrass her fellow Texans, but this has to be one of the most ridiculous ones to date.

She pushed that the measure was bi-partisan, including Democrats and Republicans.

"It's something called a continuing resolution, but it's a bill that you put on the floor that has been passed already by Republicans and Democrats in the United States Senate....that we could v**e on today," Lee said.

"We have martial law -- what that means -- and my colleagues know what it means -- is that you can put a bill on in just minutes," she added.

What in the world does martial law have to do with a government spending bill? Is this implying that Congress can just willy nilly pass a law to do wh**ever they like, in any manner they like, constitutional or unconstitutional? I think Ms. Jackson better check her 6 if that is the case. I see truckers and vets coming to town who would disagree with her.

I am begining to believe congress/senate, white house are really out of touch. Quite sure they have not a clue how us citizen live and try living a normal life. There life is NO where normal.

dhelix33

Because you disagree with what this woman has said, you call her a r****t - what country, rather what planet have you been on?

Just pathetic!

R****m has not been the tool of African-Americans in this country. R****m is a historically vile social construct and ugliness European-Americans have practiced for about 500 years. Fear of change is their drug. Lunatic behavior and violence are their modus operandi.

By standing mute while r****m, hostility, and incivility run rampant in their midst white people are r****t by virtue of accommodation, encouragement, and agreement.

The University of Washington published a multi-state study that offers convincing evidence that members of the Tea Party are far more likely to be r****t than 'average' white Americans. Their results agree with a recent NY Times / CBS News survey that found similar r****t attitudes. But Tea Partiers know they should not use overtly r****t language, “so they use coded language”. Like about “taking our country back” … but from whom?

If you doubt this, here’s a simple exercise you can do. Say that the Tea Party doing and saying the same things it does now, but its members are black (or Arabic, or Latino), and the president is white.

Imagine that white members of Congress, while walking to work, were surrounded by thousands of angry black people, one of whom proceeded to spit on one of those congressmen for not v****g the way the black demonstrators desired.

Lunatic white Tea Partiers did that to black congressmen.

Imagine that hundreds of black protesters were to descend upon Washington DC and Northern Virginia, just a few miles from the Capitol and White House, armed with AK-47s, assorted handguns, and ammunition. And imagine that some of these protesters — the black protesters — spoke of the need for political revolution, and possibly even armed conflict in the event that laws they didn’t like were enforced by the government.

White bat-sh*t crazy gun enthusiasts and Tea Partiers did that.

Imagine that a black radio host were to suggest that the only way to get promoted in the administration of a white president is by “hating black people,” or that a prominent white person had only endorsed a white p**********l candidate as an act of racial bonding, or blamed a white president for a fight on a school bus in which a black kid was jumped by two white kids, or said that he wouldn’t want to k**l all conservatives, but rather, would like to leave just enough—“living fossils” as he called them—“so we will never forget what these people stood for.”

The addict Rush Limbaugh said all that.

Imagine a black radio talk show host gleefully predicting a revolution by people of color if the government continues to be dominated by the rich white men who have been “destroying” the country, or if said radio personality were to call Christians or Jews non-humans, or say that when it came to conservatives, the best solution would be to “hang ‘em high.” And what would happen to any congressional representative who praised that commentator for “speaking common sense” and likened his h**e talk to “American values?”

Maniac Michael Savage said those things, and Texas Congressman John 'I h**e nigras' Culberson praised him for it.

Imagine that a rap artist were to say, in reference to a white president: “He’s a piece of s**t and I told him to suck on my machine gun.”

Brain-dead Ted Nugent said that about President Obama.

The choice is yours. White people can choose to stand up and say “Not in my name” when they see senseless comments like you made in this post, or they can stand mute and be judged by the deeds of their compatriots. However, I don't expect much from you people.

anomoli

Take a look at this picture, a local Tea party group:

http://www.teapartyfortlauderdale.com/publishImages/index~~element286.jpg

Top, Former NFL player and now pastor Rev. Oneal Dozier, Right, Allen West, speaking to this group who helped him get elected. Left, a high school teacher that teaches constitutional principles, (and takes flack from other teachers at his inner city school for it), right, Michael Symonette, staunch republican who knows that it was the democrats that ens***ed b****s all the way up to the late 60's, and says they are still s***es on the plantation to keep v****g in democrats. Has a picture on his website showing Al Gore Sr. laughing at a smoldering black woman and her baby after a lynching.

Get a clue.

dhelix33

Democrats did not ens***e black people - rich white r****t landowners seeking free profit did (similar to rich white r****ts that created the astro turf Teabagger/Tea Party 'movement'.

You pick an image of staged black faced stupidity at a Teabagger meeting to justify ignorant white r****t practices - by singling out black people supporting the centuries old and continuing practice of murderous oppression of black people by white people - these are people who regurgitate the vomit of their white masters (and West is an expert at self h**e). Or the vilest example of a single instance of an ignorant elected Democrat white man in the r****t South of the 20th century.

This is your justification - take a single comment by a black member of congress out of context to remove any responsibility by white people for the murderous r****t practices w****s have subjected b****s to in this country for centuries, as well as today?

There were numerous southern conservative democrats in the mid 19th century of America - and they adamantly opposed abolition - just as conservative republicans did. However, there was a time when white people had - at least a semblance of - decency there was common decency and common sense in American politics.

I will provide you with a bit of actual American history (history which you choose to reinvent to support your w***e s*********ts views). Yes, the fact is 'conservative' r****t democrats were part of the democratic party during the before and during Civil War, during both Reconstructions, and up to the time that the democrat Pres. Johnson (who like republican Pres. Lincoln understood common decency and common sense), passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In protest to common decency and common sense, all the r****t conservative 'Dixiecrats' in the democratic party jumped ship and joined the Republican party during the mid 1960s - culminating in this bat-sh*t crazy minority group of r****ts teabaggers terrorizing the nation today.

I have a clue. You need to read history and understand.

anomoli

First:
For 100 years, the Republicans fought for the freedom and e******y of b****s. Lincoln was a Republican, and he won the freedom from s***ery for b****s. In 1957, Eisenhower sent the U.S. Army to Little Rock to force Democrat Governor Orval Fabus to desegregate the schools.

All of the r****t bigots became Democrats after the Civil War because Lincoln was a Republican. For 100 years, Democrats were the ones who lynched b****s and made laws against b****s.

That's why most b****s were Republicans until the Democrats bought their v**es with welfare in 1964.

But even though the b****s switched parties in 1964, most r****t bigots did not.

How many pre-1964 southern r****t Democrat bigots did NOT join the Republican party after 1964?

Orval Fabus
Benjamin Travis Laney
John Stennis
James Eastland
Allen Ellender
Russell Long
John Sparkman
John McClellan
Richard Russell
Herman Talmadge
George Wallace
Lester Maddox
John Rarick
Robert Byrd
Al Gore, Sr.<--Oh look! See My first reply
Bull Connor

In fact, it seems that MOST of the Dixiecrats did NOT join the Republican party, even though many of them lived long past 1964.

Only a very few of them switched to the GOP, such as Strom Thurmond and Mills Godwin.

And as we all know by now, the LAST admitted former KKK member in Congress was Democrat Robert Byrd, a former KKK Kleagle, a recruiter who persuaded people to join the KKK. He fillibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Second: Civil Rights Act of 1964 roll call v**e breakdown by numbers

House of Representatives:
Democrats for: 152
Democrats against: 96
Republicans for: 138
Republicans against: 34

Senate:
Democrats for: 46
Democrats against: 21
Republicans for: 27
Republicans against: 6

As you can see, more than half of democrats are against the v**e in the house, almost half in senate. While a quarter of republicans in the house, and a fifth in the senate are against. Do the math.

But it was Lyndon "we will have n****rs v****g for us for years" Johnson, (his off the record quote) that signed it and gets all of the credit.

Oh, and Martin Luther King was, and would still be today, a conservative republican. But it was Jessee Jackson that saw the dollar signs.

Ok...now for the clincher. There were actually more s***es owned by free b****s and native Americans than white landowners. There are plenty of places to look up what your black studies professors will try to re indoctrinate, so look here...and READ! (Its a long article, scroll all the way)

http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_s***eowners.htm

Your welcome!

timmh67 Loc: USA...West Coast

You need to stick to the topic, it's only the title of this post... Nothing was said from me of her being a r****t or a r****t pig.
Get a life weirdo...

timmh67 Loc: USA...West Coast

Using the name that Obama used himself for years expose anything other than the fact that for wh**ever reason Barry changed his name a few times?

Liberal cries of r****t! r****t! would have much more impact if you used them when r****m was actually involved.

Or are you also accusing Obama of r****m because he went by the name Barry?

That would seem odd to me, but if there is one thing that liberals do best, it’s odd.

Liberals often miss the point in these debates because they are so focused on race, g****r, sexual orientation, religion, guns and orthography that they can’t see anything else. Pure R****m in America and this now administration.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

rumitoid

House of Representatives:
Democrats for: 152
Democrats against: 96
Republicans for: 138
Republicans against: 34

Senate:
Democrats for: 46
Democrats against: 21
Republicans for: 27
Republicans against: 6

"As you can see, more than half of democrats are against the v**e in the house, almost half in senate. While a quarter of republicans in the house, and a fifth in the senate are against. Do the math."


Your math is off here. To get the correct percentage, you take the total number of members. For the Dems, approximately a third were against. For the Reps, approximately a fifth.

dhelix33

Weirdo. For calling out your r****m.

Here is your title bigot: " The R****t Sheila jackson "Democrat" "

You are pathetic!

anomoli

Well, thanx for the correction, I just did a quick mental approximation. It was still more republicans percentage wise, (including Richard Nixon), that v**ed for.

As far as the martial law comment goes, these psychopaths with too much power like to throw crap at the wall and hope it sticks. Was it her that also said "socialist policies" at a congressional hearing, then caught herself and fumbled around trying to correct what she said?

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

typical case of 'living in the past' by typical left-wing ideologists who even find fault in this country's inception. what jackson was actually saying was...we will impose anything we want on you and there's nothing you can do about it! we'll see about that. left-wingers who can't see that will cause much civil unrest in the future.

timmh67 Loc: USA...West Coast

Once again... stick to the topic or is that to hard for you ?
Typical Lib... Once you trapped in a corner your only answer is to attack someone personally. hahahha, look who is pathetic now !