snowbear37 Loc: MA.

VERY INTERESTING
THE NEW WELFARE MAP
Make sure you read to the bottom...
Quite an eye opener...

These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!

Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What ' s the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.

Furthermore: There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.

A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:

U.S. 65%

England 46%

Canada 42%


Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:

U.S. 93%

England 15%

Canada 43%


Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:

U.S. 90%

England 15%

Canada 43%


Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:

U.S. 77%

England 40%

Canada 43%


Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:

U.S. 71

England 14

Canada 18


Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":

U.S. 12%

England 2%

Canada 6%


And now for the last statistic:


National Health Insurance?

U.S. NO

England YES

Canada YES

Check this last set of statistics!!

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
You know what the private business sector is; a real-life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages.


T. Roosevelt.................... 38%

Taft................................ 40%

Wilson ........................... 52%

Harding........................... 49%

Coolidge......................... 48%

Hoover ............................ 42%

F. Roosevelt..................... 50%

Truman........................... 50%

Eisenhower................ .... 57%

Kennedy......................... 30%

Johnson.......................... 47%

Nixon.............................. 53%

Ford................................ 42%

Carter............................. 32%

Reagan............................ 56%

GH Bush.......................... 51%

Clinton .......................... 39%

GW Bush........................ 55%

Obama............................. 8%


This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!

That ' s right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?

How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk
about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
They should have been in an employment line.

Poco624

Ha, ha, ha! This is so funny that I can hardly stop laughing. Yep, those "welfare mooching" states that sent Teabaggers to Washington D.C. to shrink the government are now wondering why Washington D.C. is leaving them out in the cold.

An early freak blizzard has k**led over 20,000 cattle in South Dakota and now they need some of that federal money. Ha, ha, ha! The agency they need has been furloughed because of the government shutdown, and there will be no "federal handout" for them. Oh, those "moocher states" are such cry babies.

Gov. Dennis Daugaard said that neighbors need to help neighbors and is asking for donations. Oh, this really should be interesting. How do you dispose of 20,000 cow carcasses? Wow, seriously, I would not want to live in SD or any other surrounding state when those carcasses start to decay.

South Dakota blizzard k**ls, burries cows; shutdown leaves ranchers in the cold (video)
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/10/us/south-dakota-blizzard-k**ls-herds-cattle/

South Dakota Fourth Largest Red-State Moocher
http://madvilletimes.com/2012/12/south-dakota-fourth-largest-red-state-moocher/

What is even more hilarious is the fact that the government shutdown will soon stop the "federal handouts" to those Red State moochers, freeloading deadbeats and gold-digging parasites. It is long pass time for the Blue States to pull the life support plug for those welfare bums.

Chris Christie Stabs Rand Paul In His Red State Moocher Heart
http://defendingthet***h.com/current-events/28299-chris-christie-stabs-rand-paul-his-red-state-moocher-heart.html

astrolite

Hey Poco Intelligencia, Again you lie! But you are getting better...using libtard sites to bolster your lies makes you "sound legit".

John Deere

You're stupidity never stops with your outdated info, probably from the 1930s, you Obama plant.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

I am just going to reply to the medical survive-ability statistics with a story. My grandmother received medical treatment and got to live a miserable existence for 5 years until she died. Be careful with this kind of information because it isn't the whole story: being alive and living are two different scenarios and being alive with endless medical treatment is not living.
No, I am not suggesting death panels or anything else. Why are we so afraid of discussing these issues intelligently? Bravely? Where is the incentive for the medical community to even fight cancer for people in their 50's, 60's. Get your life in order, say goodbye to your friends and family and face it like an adult! We are born to die, not live forever.

Poco624

Lying? No, why, what is wrong? Did you feel sympathy for Rand Paul's "Red State moocher heart problem"?

Poco624

Nope, that info is from 2012 and 2013. Why don't you read before you start complaining? Yeah, I bet it is difficult to find out that your Red States are among the 47% that Romney said wouldn't v**e for him no matter what, and they did. And now they need federal handouts, yep, those Welfare Queen states.

Romney Decries His Red State Southern Base as Lazy Moochers: the 47% (Yep, Romney said that, and it was a real insult to those who v**ed for him.)
http://www.t***h-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/item/17515-romney-decries-his-red-state-southern-base-as-lazy-moochers-the-47

My guess is that the government shutdown will be happening very shortly; those Red States will go bankrupt without their federal money addition.

nana55

I didn't see what states you said this was in so i have to question your sources and report Obviously its not the state I live in where a household of 2 struggle to eat on under 200 a month where food prices are high and that's all the help there is .Medical, Obama care sends a person to a select clinic where they are seen by a PA, vitals are done and then they want you to go to a lab out of town and pay a 50 dollar fee there. or no diagnosis or treatment.and a co payment is paid upfront. Its cheap , useless and of no help to any health issues . One has to have probably about 5 or more illegitimate kids, be pregnant and an illegal here to get near the help you suggested . everyone else struggled to find work and survive and kiss butt for the little help they get

SchoonerPete

This is misleading as it does not tell the whole story. But, since when have the l*****ts ever cared about the whole story - they only like to pick and choose the small bits that supports their warped argument. How about looking at the whole tax & entitlement picture stats from these states, and the rest of the states, and you will see a different picture. Most of these states are small population states with indian reservations, large military bases, large amounts of government land, etc.

Poco624

Wow, really, I just find it very amusing how the right justifies the deadbeats in their party. Texas isn't a small state and that friggin' governor is one of the biggest gold-diggers in your party, and he has an oil rich state.

Seriously, there is no shame among GOP governors who complain about people needing SNAP while sitting in their taxpayer paid Governors Mansions, collecting a taxpayer salary, and freeloading off of the Federal government.

And that is exactly what Texas Gov. Rick Perry did. While bragging about his $6 billion "rainy day fund' he freeloaded $6.4 billion form Obama's "big government".

CNN - Anderson Cooper - KTH: Gov. Rick Perry -Takes Federal Money
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD1vslsaxEU

Who knows what he spends his federal money on, it is common knowledge that it isn't roads since he is letting Texas roads go back to dirt and gravel. Whoopee! Horse and buggy days are just around the corner.

And since education is not a priority for the right, what else does he need that money for?

John Deere

Your map doesn't match up to your chart.

rumitoid

You should add LA, AR, and WV: all get more federal aid than they pay in taxes.

And please provide the site where you obtained these stats.

rumitoid

astrolite if you can counter what you call "lies" then provide a site to verify.

Poco624

I did not print the map, I posted it. It is the same "Non-Payer by State" map that is in the article and it matched up just perfectly with the article. All of the states in red are the biggest "Welfare Deadbeats". Those GOP governors tax the poor and give tax breaks to the rich, so the need government money to balance their budgets.

Maybe the following article will clarify some of wh**ever is confusing you, some of those same states have the highest rate of poverty. At what point do these people wake-up and say "what I am doing is not working".

Americans would not have to guess what the country would look like if the "small-government" ideology were implemented on a national scale.

Why Do Red States Have More Poverty? (yep, the same Red States in the previous article are also in this one)
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/14108704-why-do-red-states-have-more-poverty

WHY DO RED STATES HAVE MORE POVERTY?

astrolite

This is from a l*****t reporter on a liberal rag in Tampa Fl. He calls himself "itobin53" He even quotes "Salon", And lies about our governor! I'm surprised NewsMax put his trash on their site! Being a subscriber I'll have to write a letter about that, "Watch for Moles!"