First, I would like to apologize to anyone that joins this group where I used ugly descriptive terms in reference to a political persuasion that did not match my Progressive opinion in previous threads. It obvious that there are polarized views on political opinion. That being said I would like to have a civil discussion on opinions from those who may identify themselves as Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, Conservative Republicans, Tea Party Republicans, or traditional Republicans. I will not use any terms to describe a person with an opinion that I disagree with using any derogatory name.
I believe that if we take time to use a forum in a constructive as opposed to destructive manner, we may begin to see communications where we agree on some topics, as well as points we don't agree on in a rational civil tone. So let me start...
Blue state, red state. Big government vs. small government. Gun rights vs. gun control. A******n control vs. pro choice. Common good for all Americans vs. Socialism. Today our country is driven by the politics of extremes. To paraphrase a humorist - Republicans think of Democrats as godless, unpatriotic, Volvo-driving, France-loving, elitist latte guzzlers, whereas Democrats dismiss Republicans as ignorant, NASCAR-obsessed, gun-fondling religious fanatics. An exaggeration, for sure, but the reality is still pretty stark. Congress is in a perpetual stalemate today because of the two parties' inability to find middle ground on practically anything - and driving America to revolt.
Don't let these politicians continue to manipulate and divide us. Can I get a consensus we who are republicans and democrats actually agree about the most important things? For instance, I believe republicans and democrats are both fed up with both the republican and democratic parties, because it has become obvious that both parties serve Wall Street and the military-industrial complex at the expense of Americans.
Its an old tactic: Get your opponents to fight amongst themselves so that they will get weaker and you can pick them off one by one. Gaius Julius Caesar coined the phrase divide et impera (divide and conquer) to describe it. He used it in his war against the Gauls, but in the millennia since then it has also become a very common political strategy. Again and again, the ruling classes of various societies at various times have used this trick to keep the people in line, to make ordinary people fight each other - both literally and figuratively - and forget about the people who are really making the mess. It continues to be used today all over the world, sometimes with great success. But sometimes people figure out whats going on, and refuse to be divided.
Whether the wedge being used is religion or employment status or race, the strategy is the same: divide and conquer. Corporate America knows that it cannot fight all Americans at once. So they must turn us against each other if they are to win. If we are to win - WE THE PEOPLE - must stand together!
carolyn wrote:
Our elected officials had the audacity to attempt to again deceive us into believing that the sky was falling.
Are we exaggerating? Consider the fact that p**********l mouthpiece Jay Carney actually went so far as to say that a government shutdown would lead to the collapse of the world economy.
And when the government supposedly shut down, our elected officials somehow forgot to shut down their paychecks... and that's not right.
But our elected officials simply did not neglect to shutdown their salaries... they somehow forgot to tell us that 85% of government expenditures would be unaffected by this so-called shutdown.
That doesn't sound like a shutdown at all...it sounds like something more akin to what the American have been demanding for far too long... fiscal sanity.
Our elected officials had the audacity to attempt ... (
show quote)