State Department's B******i review let senior officials off the hook: Well, here we go again. The House Committee on government oversight is at it again. Thursday, Septembr 19 they...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Well, here we go again. The House Committee on government oversight is at it again. Thursday, Septembr 19 they have a meeting set to look into B******i further. They have already looked into it further than the department appointed ARB and I just read that the committee is considered the committee against Hillary for 2016. I guess that means that they have no right to look further into B******i just in case they find her more guilty than some think now.

I love to see people like the ranking member on the committee call Deputy Hicks, who did testify before the committee earlier this year, a liar. This one gets more interesting all the time and I will be watching closely Thursday to see Trey Gowdy doing what he does so well in the area of questioning.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/16/state-departments-b******i-review-let-senior-officials-off-hook-report-finds/

Here is some information about the work of that committee from Daily Kos. Enjoy leaners.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/09/16/1239207/-House-Committee-to-Stop-Hillary-Clinton-2016-leaks-B******i-draft-report

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

She was in charge, refused extra secuity and then someone issued a stand down order. Who really should hang for this will be protected at all costs.

oldroy wrote:

Well, here we go again. The House Committee on go... (show quote)

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

She was in charge, refused extra secuity and then someone issued a stand down order. Who really should hang for this will be protected at all costs.

oldroy wrote:

Well, here we go again. The House Committee on go... (show quote)

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

bmac32 wrote:

She was in charge, refused extra secuity and then someone issued a stand down order. Who really should hang for this will be protected at all costs.

It looks like our left leaning "friends" stayed away from this one for some reason. They are so good at saying the GOP is wrong but never point out the ways they are wrong.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

I simply look at this as wrong when they had asked for protection beyond the normal. Who better to know what was needed, those on the ground or those in Washington? Stevens wasn't new at this game, neither were his security people, Clinton has new and it showed.

oldroy wrote:

It looks like our left leaning "friends" stayed away from this one for some reason. They are so good at saying the GOP is wrong but never point out the ways they are wrong.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

bmac32 wrote:

I simply look at this as wrong when they had asked for protection beyond the normal. Who better to know what was needed, those on the ground or those in Washington? Stevens wasn't new at this game, neither were his security people, Clinton has new and it showed.

I have to agree with you but I don't think that Clinton will ever be forced to say anything now. She didn't even have to speak to the ARB because of her "fall" and concussion. Of course, the left will never want to see her have to testify under oath since it may blow up her 2016 bid.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

That was under Bill but shewas out pushing it along with tougher regs on hand guns. It just goes to show that neither party has all the good or bad ideas.

oldroy wrote:

I have to agree with you but I don't think that Clinton will ever be forced to say anything now. She didn't even have to speak to the ARB because of her "fall" and concussion. Of course, the left will never want to see her have to testify under oath since it may blow up her 2016 bid.