McCain, Graham call US-Russia agreement on Syria 'meaningless': Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham criticized the U.S.-Russia agreement Saturday to disarm Syria of its chemical...

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham criticized the U.S.-Russia agreement Saturday to disarm Syria of its chemical weapons, calling it meaningless and saying the agreement sends the wrong signal to Iran, which is suspected of building a nuclear weapon.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/mccain-graham-call-us-russia-agreement-meaningless/

TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon

He also said recently:

"I dont want to be one of these old guys that shouldve shoved off.

Sorry, John, TOO LATE!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/322141-mccain-hints-at-retirement-in-2016

Lou Loc: Florida

TroubleshooterTim wrote:

He also said recently:

"I dont want to be one of these old guys that shouldve shoved off.

Sorry, John, TOO LATE!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/322141-mccain-hints-at-retirement-in-2016

I say get a two seat F-16 jet fighter , and let McCain and Graham launch a bombing run on Damascus . If they get shot down and captured , we'll back'em up .

joe1941

Lou wrote:

I say get a two seat F-16 jet fighter , and let McCain and Graham launch a bombing run on Damascus . If they get shot down and captured , we'll back'em up .

That's a great idea!

Pogo Loc: New Mexico via Carolinas

Lou wrote:

I say get a two seat F-16 jet fighter , and let McCain and Graham launch a bombing run on Damascus . If they get shot down and captured , we'll back'em up .

I agree, as long as we "back'em up" in the same manner as those we lost in B******i.

McCain is a genuine war hero, and was at one time an effective senator. It's time for him to sit down, and STFU.

Lou Loc: Florida

Pogo wrote:

I agree, as long as we "back'em up" in the same manner as those we lost in B******i.

McCain is a genuine war hero, and was at one time an effective senator. It's time for him to sit down, and STFU.

You mean like Reagan backed up those 265 US Marines in the Embassy in Beirut ?

bluejacket

Pogo wrote:

I agree, as long as we "back'em up" in the same manner as those we lost in B******i.

McCain is a genuine war hero, and was at one time an effective senator. It's time for him to sit down, and STFU.

I do not know if what is happening in Syria will result in peace , but just try and if the nerve gas is removed all the better , if Assad wins I do not want him to have nerve gas and if the rebels win I sure as hell do not want them to have nerve gas.
McCain and Graham just want a war irespective of the damage it will do to us.

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

Lou wrote:

You mean like Reagan backed up those 265 US Marines in the Embassy in Beirut ?

And, who would Reagan retaliate against? The group Islamic Jihad, affiliated with Hezbollah and ultimately Iran, claimed responsibility for both attacks. An attack on Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard barracks was approved by Reagan, but Defense Secretary Weinberger lobbied successfully against the mission, because at the time it was not certain that Iran was behind the attack. But, Reagan did want revenge, they just didn't have a real target to go after. They did leave several U.S. Navy ships in the area (including the battleship New Jersey) for several months.

Lou Loc: Florida

OldSchool wrote:

And, who would Reagan retaliate against? The grou... (show quote)

Weinberger was Reagans boy , if Weinberger wanted it he would have got it .
But that's not my point ./

WHAT GOT THOSE MARINES K**LED ?

WHO GAVE THE ORDER THAT THOSE MARINES GUARDING THE ENTRANCE AT THE EMBASSY GATE SHOULD NOT HAVE LIVE AMMO ?

WHO ?

THEY WATCHED AS THE TRUCK AND DRIVER DROVE RIGHT BY AND BLEW UP THE EMBASSY , IT COULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED SAVING 265 US MARINES .

WHERE WAS THE INQUIRY , WHO WAS HELD RESPONSIBLE ?

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

Lou wrote:

Weinberger was Reagans boy , if Weinberger wanted it he would have got it .
But that's not my point ./

WHAT GOT THOSE MARINES K**LED ?

WHO GAVE THE ORDER THAT THOSE MARINES GUARDING THE ENTRANCE AT THE EMBASSY GATE SHOULD NOT HAVE LIVE AMMO ?

WHO ?

THEY WATCHED AS THE TRUCK AND DRIVER DROVE RIGHT BY AND BLEW UP THE EMBASSY , IT COULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED SAVING 265 US MARINES .

WHERE WAS THE INQUIRY , WHO WAS HELD RESPONSIBLE ?

Who Who Who what are you...a fucking owl??? I knew I shouldn't have replied to that post, I guess I was naive enough to think maybe I would get into a civilized debate with you on something. Shame on me for thinking like that.

Lou Loc: Florida

OldSchool wrote:

Who Who Who what are you...a fucking owl??? I knew I shouldn't have replied to that post, I guess I was naive enough to think maybe I would get into a civilized debate with you on something. Shame on me for thinking like that.

What's the matter oldschool ? Asking a question is too much for your pidgeon brain to absorb ?
You're right , you shouldn't have , you should have just kept you're fu**ing dumbass mouth shut , because you're a mealy mouthed know nothing , a brainless programmed parrot that repeats what it's told . SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING STUPID .

NOT TO MENTION , YOU SO CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT THOSE 265 AMERICAN MARINES , WHY AND HOW THEY DIED , YOU PATHETIC SYCOPHANT P.O.S.

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

Lou wrote:

What's the matter oldschool ? Asking a question is too much for your pidgeon brain to absorb ?
You're right , you shouldn't have , you should have just kept you're fu**ing dumbass mouth shut , because you're a mealy mouthed know nothing , a brainless programmed parrot that repeats what it's told . SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING STUPID .

NOT TO MENTION , YOU SO CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT THOSE 265 AMERICAN MARINES , WHY AND HOW THEY DIED , YOU PATHETIC SYCOPHANT P.O.S.

And, FU you POS!!!!!! I'm amazed you can see to write because you have your head so far up your moronic ass!

Lou Loc: Florida

OldSchool wrote:

And, FU you POS!!!!!! I'm amazed you can see to write because you have your head so far up your moronic ass!

As usual , no answer , just a smokescreen of stupidity .

VladimirPee

It is sort of meaningless. Without boots on the ground , which I oppose, there is simply no way of knowing how many Chem or Bio weapons they have. We never had an inventory and we must take Assads word on the quantity. And of course Putin will be covering for Assad.

OldSchool wrote:

Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham criticized the U.S.-Russia agreement Saturday to disarm Syria of its chemical weapons, calling it meaningless and saying the agreement sends the wrong signal to Iran, which is suspected of building a nuclear weapon.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/mccain-graham-call-us-russia-agreement-meaningless/

bluejacket

DennisDee wrote:

It is sort of meaningless. Without boots on the ground , which I oppose, there is simply no way of knowing how many Chem or Bio weapons they have. We never had an inventory and we must take Assads word on the quantity. And of course Putin will be covering for Assad.

yes Putin is the question mark, it all depends on his intent and seriousness on the subject