One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Libralism in America
Sep 14, 2013 23:06:15   #
lone_ghost Loc: Wisconsin
 
What exactly is liberalism. No diatribes, no rhetoric, Just simple fact. Liberals want to eliminate God as a fundamental aspect of human nature. I am not going to give you a whole bunch of websites to verify this, just open your eyes. Liberals believe that every one should be equal and it does not matter if they put forth any effort to be so, they still are entitled to everything that those who do work have earned. Liberals believe that abhorrent behavior is excusable, morality has no meaning, ethics are subjective to the individual. Liberals believe that they can create a utopian society where every one is just as they are. However, they have forgotten human nature. We are independent, the only way they can control us would be through authoritarianism. What seems like a good idea now will turn into a nightmare later. It is inevitable.

Reply
Sep 14, 2013 23:44:39   #
virgil Loc: petal.ms
 
we could outlaw liberalism but that would be against our fore fathers design. But, sooner (I hope) than later they will as will the rest of American find out that our constitution allows for both without keep the god part away from schools, meetings and government business. ALL OF OUR RELIGIONS ARE THE FOUNDATIONS OF OUR COUNTRIES MORALS. Without which we come to what we are today.

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 00:54:38   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
virgil wrote:
we could outlaw liberalism but that would be against our fore fathers design. But, sooner (I hope) than later they will as will the rest of American find out that our constitution allows for both without keep the god part away from schools, meetings and government business. ALL OF OUR RELIGIONS ARE THE FOUNDATIONS OF OUR COUNTRIES MORALS. Without which we come to what we are today.


liberalism could be tolerated in this country but the c*******m that has taken over the democrat party should not be tolerated

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2013 06:56:31   #
4vbs2
 
lone_ghost wrote:
What exactly is liberalism. No diatribes, no rhetoric, Just simple fact. Liberals want to eliminate God as a fundamental aspect of human nature. I am not going to give you a whole bunch of websites to verify this, just open your eyes. Liberals believe that every one should be equal and it does not matter if they put forth any effort to be so, they still are entitled to everything that those who do work have earned. Liberals believe that abhorrent behavior is excusable, morality has no meaning, ethics are subjective to the individual. Liberals believe that they can create a utopian society where every one is just as they are. However, they have forgotten human nature. We are independent, the only way they can control us would be through authoritarianism. What seems like a good idea now will turn into a nightmare later. It is inevitable.
What exactly is liberalism. No diatribes, no rheto... (show quote)


REALLY???? If you are so good at reading minds, perhaps you can tell us what Assad is thinking? Or how the stock market will go today? That is the problem with extreme "Conservatives". They think that they know all of the answers. Why not drop the labels and deal with the issues?

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 08:13:15   #
weneedrubio
 
Even the Pope has said that "sin is going against your conscience and you can get to Heaven without believing in God." Can't get much more liberal then that. Now even the church is no good for answering life's questions.
lone_ghost wrote:
What exactly is liberalism. No diatribes, no rhetoric, Just simple fact. Liberals want to eliminate God as a fundamental aspect of human nature. I am not going to give you a whole bunch of websites to verify this, just open your eyes. Liberals believe that every one should be equal and it does not matter if they put forth any effort to be so, they still are entitled to everything that those who do work have earned. Liberals believe that abhorrent behavior is excusable, morality has no meaning, ethics are subjective to the individual. Liberals believe that they can create a utopian society where every one is just as they are. However, they have forgotten human nature. We are independent, the only way they can control us would be through authoritarianism. What seems like a good idea now will turn into a nightmare later. It is inevitable.
What exactly is liberalism. No diatribes, no rheto... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 08:15:41   #
weneedrubio
 
Liberalism requires equqlity regardless of input, that's c*******m. Just look at our schools and what the liberal movement has done to them. Read Obamacare, e******y of care regardless of input is what it is all about too.
alex wrote:
liberalism could be tolerated in this country but the c*******m that has taken over the democrat party should not be tolerated

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 09:20:08   #
Ve'hoe
 
"In The Future of Liberalism (2009), Alan Wolfe writes that the true heirs to the liberalism of John Locke, Adam Smith, and Thomas Jefferson are not today’s classical liberals (libertarians), but rather the other kind of liberals, those who would use government power to assure autonomy and e******y for all. Such “modern liberalism,” for Wolfe, is simply an updating of the original: In the eighteenth century, political power crushed autonomy and e******y, requiring a free market as the antidote; now private corporate power under capitalism does the same, but this time the remedy is active government." Sheldon Richmond.


"But now I must part ways with Wolfe because he has an utterly self-defeating idea of how to secure everyone’s mastery over his or her own one’s destiny: the welfare state. Judging by the history and nature of the state, we must conclude that Wolfe’s program would lead not to liberation but rather to subjugation of the individual. Wolfe has things turned topsy-turvy: To advocate today what Smith advocated yesterday—a free market unregulated by government—is to foster greater, rather than lesser, dependency and less, rather than more, e******y. . . . [I]n the highly organized and concentrated forms taken by capitalism in the contemporary world, removing government from the marketplace does not allow large numbers of people to become entrepreneurs in ways that enable them to set the terms by which their lives will be led; it instead allows firms to reduce their obligations to their employees and thereby make them more dependent on the vagaries of the market."

That pretty much describes what we have now,,,, and it isn't working...our capitalism has wiped out the mom/pop entrepreneurs,,, and our corporate capitalism has become more like corporate piracy...aided a great deal by our v**ed in corrupt leadership.....


weneedrubio wrote:
Liberalism requires equqlity regardless of input, that's c*******m. Just look at our schools and what the liberal movement has done to them. Read Obamacare, e******y of care regardless of input is what it is all about too.

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2013 09:55:42   #
vernon
 
4vbs2 wrote:
REALLY???? If you are so good at reading minds, perhaps you can tell us what Assad is thinking? Or how the stock market will go today? That is the problem with extreme "Conservatives". They think that they know all of the answers. Why not drop the labels and deal with the issues?


i think political parties should be outlawed.they do nothing for the country ,they they just perpuate their own their own existance

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 10:58:37   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
vernon wrote:
i think political parties should be outlawed.they do nothing for the country ,they they just perpuate their own their own existance


as long as people have choice there will be political parties what you are advocating is that people should have no choice

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 11:25:02   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
4vbs2 wrote:
REALLY???? If you are so good at reading minds, perhaps you can tell us what Assad is thinking? Or how the stock market will go today? That is the problem with extreme "Conservatives". They think that they know all of the answers. Why not drop the labels and deal with the issues?


It has been said that the Founders were Liberals. They were, but now in today's sense of the word. Their Liberalism was that of John Locke, the 17th Century philosopher credited with establishing this as a viable system of beliefs. Liberalism, in it's original packaging, was a great deal like modern day Libertarianism, in that the Liberalism of the Founders, and of Locke, advocated large amounts of personal freedom, but recognized the need for large amounts of personal responsibility as it's concomitant. The Liberalism of the Founders included a belief in a Lassez Faire or free market economy, rather than the discredited (to everyone but modern day "liberals") Keynesian model requiring massive governmental interference.

Modern day Liberalism, unlike that of the Founders, is an abdication of personal responsibility, and freedom to the clutches of some faceless, omniscient "Authority," (hereinafter known as government), that, despite all evidence to the contrary, in the Liberal dream world, is somehow always benevolent. Just let "Authority" run everything, and there will be a chicken in every pot, 2 cars in every garage, and ice cream for Sunday dinner, all paid for with someone else's money. Exactly who that someone is, is never really explained.

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 13:30:24   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
banjojack wrote:
It has been said that the Founders were Liberals. They were, but now in today's sense of the word. Their Liberalism was that of John Locke, the 17th Century philosopher credited with establishing this as a viable system of beliefs. Liberalism, in it's original packaging, was a great deal like modern day Libertarianism, in that the Liberalism of the Founders, and of Locke, advocated large amounts of personal freedom, but recognized the need for large amounts of personal responsibility as it's concomitant. The Liberalism of the Founders included a belief in a Lassez Faire or free market economy, rather than the discredited (to everyone but modern day "liberals") Keynesian model requiring massive governmental interference.

Modern day Liberalism, unlike that of the Founders, is an abdication of personal responsibility, and freedom to the clutches of some faceless, omniscient "Authority," (hereinafter known as government), that, despite all evidence to the contrary, in the Liberal dream world, is somehow always benevolent. Just let "Authority" run everything, and there will be a chicken in every pot, 2 cars in every garage, and ice cream for Sunday dinner, all paid for with someone else's money. Exactly who that someone is, is never really explained.
It has been said that the Founders were Liberals. ... (show quote)


Dayum banjo why do I agree with you? :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2013 13:58:34   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
Dayum banjo why do I agree with you? :lol: :thumbup:


Hopefully because I'm right.

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 15:55:42   #
vernon
 
alex wrote:
as long as people have choice there will be political parties what you are advocating is that people should have no choice


Alex how is that taking away from choice.i believe it would increase choice because increase particitation.these parties just nominate the people that are for party not country.

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 16:07:36   #
Ve'hoe
 
Assad is thinking: HAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA,,,, deeeeeeep breath)..HAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I should have gone to Havuud! HAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHA


4vbs2 wrote:
REALLY???? If you are so good at reading minds, perhaps you can tell us what Assad is thinking? Or how the stock market will go today? That is the problem with extreme "Conservatives". They think that they know all of the answers. Why not drop the labels and deal with the issues?

Reply
Sep 15, 2013 16:11:04   #
vernon
 
4vbs2 wrote:
REALLY???? If you are so good at reading minds, perhaps you can tell us what Assad is thinking? Or how the stock market will go today? That is the problem with extreme "Conservatives". They think that they know all of the answers. Why not drop the labels and deal with the issues?


4vbs you talk about extreme , how can you v**e for a demorat it is the most extreme party in the history of the us

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.