Dave wrote:
You are clearly in denial - you make a claim even she didn't - she admits to using her private server and claims she turned over the work related to the Dept of State.
When one denies even the facts that she admits to in defense of her one is clearly so blinded as to render themselves incapable of intellectually honest discussion.
--------
Sir, your reading comprehension is very sub-par. Re-read my post. I said "...they DID NOT use their private emails for government business, ONLY." "Only" denotes an exclusivity. "Did not" denotes that the action was not done. Is Engish not your first language; or do you have a reading disorder?
BOTH HRC AND POWELL, PUBLICALLY STATED that used their personal emails for work AND personal emails. Geez. Now I know that in addition to being partisan, you're myopic and in dire need of glasses.
She said she turned over 55,000 pages of emails. Thus far, the partisan committee looking into them hasn't said they discovered anything that broke the law. Nor, has the FBI said they've found any 'smoking guns.' Again, innocent until proven guilty, unless you're a candidate that Dave dislikes; then, it's guilty until proven innocent.
Unless you're an active member of the Committee investigating HRC, and until they release findings proving her guilt, the fact that you've already found her lacking proves my claim that you're very partisan. I'm no where near D.C. at present and am not privy to the inner workings of the committee looking into HRC. Seemingly, you have info not even the Committee has released. Why don't you share it so the rest of us can see it for ourselves. Who knows, I might change my opinion of her, too.
Until then, 'you got nuttin' but a very vocal animosity toward her, based only on what you've heard from the media. Of course, that's all you conservatives need to decide someone is bad for the country and especially your political points of view. And, especially if the info comes from Fox Entertainment News.
Like Bernie Sanders said at the Democratic debate, "I'm tired of hearing about her damn emails." All this is is a partisian which-hunt and you're just a sidelines fanatic shouting from the stands for someone to, "pound her into the dirt."
Unless and until you, Dave, can provide me/us with some facts that can prove HRC's guilty of anything criminal, then please, don't waste our time with any more hypotheticals about HRC and "...her damn emails." If you don't like her, fine, I get that. But, after watching both Republican debates and the one Democratic debate, HRC, in my mind, is the best candidate based on her experience and knowledge of the issues.
I also think Jim Webb would make a fine Sec of Defense and Bernie Sanders a good VP. I think Kasich would do a good job in a Clinton administration in a Cabinet position, as would Ben Carson be a good Surgeon General. Even Chris Christie would be a good pick for a Cabinet position.
Lastly, I really wish Joe Biden had already tossed his hat into the ring. To do so now, I think, would do the Democratic candidates, already running, a disservice and COULD turn the Democratic primary into a clown-circus, just like the GOPTP.
BTW- Just so you know, I'm a registered Republican. Unfortunately, I feel the GOP left me back in the 80's. People like Rush Limbaugh and his ilk, the "unofficial spokespersons for the GOPTP," who only know how to insult, tell lies and twist the truth, caused me to question the GOP's political direction. They no longer cared about the people. All they cared about was demonizing the opponent to the point they were seen, literally, as the devil; not just someone with a different political point of view. The GOP quit being civil and became uncivil, uncompromising and dis-unifying.
As a country, we don't need or desire that brand of politics. And, now, the GOPTP only cares about the top 10% while expecting the middle class to carry the load for the rest of the country. I also dislike how the GOPTP uses religion (Christianity) and patriotism as weapons against its opponents.
Whatever happened to, "From him that much was given, much is expected." Is that not in the Bible? I don't think God created the poor and needy just to give us people to blame our woes on. People, by their own greedy actions created the poor and needy. Now, God is watching us to see how we take care of what we created. Somehow, I don't think we're doing very well. People are very protective of their possessions. But, how many armored cars follow a hearse to a funeral? Christ said for us to give away everything we own and to follow Him. As the richest country on Earth, how well are we following His command? With the GOPTP saying that the poor and immigrants are bankrupting the country, and that we need to cut social programs and deport 11 million people, how does that mesh with Jesus' words? I don't see it.
The GOPTP has been able to get its followers to think in a "us vs them" mentality. Gone are the days of what's best for the majority. Now, the special interest groups openly buy and sell politicians like candy. Perhaps we should force politicians to wear badges, like NASCAR drivers, advertising who the politicians are owned by and who they owe political favors to.
I won't deny I sound very partisian. But it's out of a sad change, in a once good party, that I now have these feelings. Special interest groups have taken over the GOPTP, just like the Dems. Unfortunately, to me at least, the GOPTP has become far more hypocritical in its words and actions. All one need do is look at recent history, beginning with the Clinton administration, with an open mind, and it's very obvious where MOST of the obstructionism and favoritism in government originated and continues to originate. Just saying...