One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Leaning Left
In 1951 a poor woman's cells were taken without permission
Sep 14, 2015 10:53:40   #
moldyoldy
 
In 1951 a poor woman's cells were taken without permission, and they revolutionised medicine

SCIENCEALERT STAFF 22 APR 2014


The Lacks Family via NPR

Henrietta Lacks' immortal cells are one of the most important and prolific tools in medicine, used in developing the polio vaccine, cloning and gene mapping.

Henrietta Lacks was a 31-year-old mother of five when she died of cervical cancer on 4 October 1951. While the poor tobacco farmer was being treated at the John Hopkins Hospital, two samples of her cervix were removed - a healthy part and a cancerous part - without her permission or knowledge.

These cells were passed onto Dr George Otto Gey, who discovered they could do something never seen before in humans cells - be kept alive and keep growing indefinitely. Before this, cultured cells had only survived a few days in the lab.

Gey was able to isolate one specific cell and start the first ever immortal cell line, which he named HeLa after Henrietta.

Since then these cells have been exposed to toxins, viruses and raidation, sent into space and replicated countless times. They've been involved in thousands of medical breakthroughs and helped to develop the polio vaccine, cloning and gene mapping.

Scientists have grown around 20 tons of HeLa cells, and there are almost 11,000 patents involving HeLa cells. One researcher has estimated that if you laid all the HeLa cells in existence end-to-end, they'd wrap around the planet at least three times.

In 2010, a tube of HeLa cells was selling for around US$260. But unfortunately Henrietta's family were never compensated for her donation and most of them could't afford health insurance.

Journalist Rebecca Skloot wrote a best-selling book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the subject in 2010.

After reading it, Dr Roland Pattillo of the Morehouse School of Medicine in the US donated a headstone for Lacks. For decades, her grave had been unmarked.

The headstone, which is shaped like a book, reads:

Henrietta Lacks, August 01, 1920 – October 04, 1951.

In loving memory of a phenomenal woman, wife and mother who touched the lives of many.

Here lies Henrietta Lacks (HeLa). Her immortal cells will continue to help mankind forever.

Eternal Love and Admiration, From Your Family

Thank you, Henrietta.

Sources: Smithsonian, The Guardian,Wikipedia, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks



Reply
Sep 15, 2015 11:07:18   #
jelun
 
moldyoldy wrote:
In 1951 a poor woman's cells were taken without permission, and they revolutionised medicine

SCIENCEALERT STAFF 22 APR 2014


The Lacks Family via NPR

Henrietta Lacks' immortal cells are one of the most important and prolific tools in medicine, used in developing the polio vaccine, cloning and gene mapping.

Henrietta Lacks was a 31-year-old mother of five when she died of cervical cancer on 4 October 1951. While the poor tobacco farmer was being treated at the John Hopkins Hospital, two samples of her cervix were removed - a healthy part and a cancerous part - without her permission or knowledge.

These cells were passed onto Dr George Otto Gey, who discovered they could do something never seen before in humans cells - be kept alive and keep growing indefinitely. Before this, cultured cells had only survived a few days in the lab.

Gey was able to isolate one specific cell and start the first ever immortal cell line, which he named HeLa after Henrietta.

Since then these cells have been exposed to toxins, viruses and raidation, sent into space and replicated countless times. They've been involved in thousands of medical breakthroughs and helped to develop the polio vaccine, cloning and gene mapping.

Scientists have grown around 20 tons of HeLa cells, and there are almost 11,000 patents involving HeLa cells. One researcher has estimated that if you laid all the HeLa cells in existence end-to-end, they'd wrap around the planet at least three times.

In 2010, a tube of HeLa cells was selling for around US$260. But unfortunately Henrietta's family were never compensated for her donation and most of them could't afford health insurance.

Journalist Rebecca Skloot wrote a best-selling book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks on the subject in 2010.

After reading it, Dr Roland Pattillo of the Morehouse School of Medicine in the US donated a headstone for Lacks. For decades, her grave had been unmarked.

The headstone, which is shaped like a book, reads:

Henrietta Lacks, August 01, 1920 – October 04, 1951.

In loving memory of a phenomenal woman, wife and mother who touched the lives of many.

Here lies Henrietta Lacks (HeLa). Her immortal cells will continue to help mankind forever.

Eternal Love and Admiration, From Your Family

Thank you, Henrietta.

Sources: Smithsonian, The Guardian,Wikipedia, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
In 1951 a poor woman's cells were taken without pe... (show quote)



Must be bad choices that brought this about.
Henrietta Lacks should never gone to have her cancer treated and then her family would not have been cheated in order for pharmaceutical corporations to make millions while it never occurred to any of them that compensation might be appropriate.
Thank you, Henrietta Lacks for preventing polio for so many, and for contributing to so many other health improvements.

Reply
Sep 15, 2015 12:46:12   #
moldyoldy
 
jelun wrote:
Must be bad choices that brought this about.
Henrietta Lacks should never gone to have her cancer treated and then her family would not have been cheated in order for pharmaceutical corporations to make millions while it never occurred to any of them that compensation might be appropriate.
Thank you, Henrietta Lacks for preventing polio for so many, and for contributing to so many other health improvements.


I would really love to know what was different about her.

In law and ethics[edit]

Neither Lacks nor her family gave her physician permission to harvest the cells. At that time, permission was neither required nor customarily sought.[36] The cells were later commercialized. In the 1980s, family medical records were published without family consent. A similar issue was brought up in the Supreme Court of California case of Moore v. Regents of the University of California. On July 9, 1990, the court ruled that a person's discarded tissue and cells are not their property and can be commercialized.[37]

In March 2013, German researchers published the DNA code, or genome, of a strain of HeLa cells without permission from the Lacks family.[38] Later, in August 2013, an agreement by the family and the National Institutes of Health was announced that gave the family some control over access to the cells' DNA code and a promise of acknowledgement in scientific papers. In addition, two family members will join a six-member committee which will regulate access to the code.

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2015 14:12:40   #
jelun
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I would really love to know what was different about her.


I don't suppose we will ever know. It could be the stage of cancer when they operated, I have recently heard about some immunity development, maybe genetics had a piece in it.
It just would have been nice for her or her family to be asked for a donation.



Quote:
In law and ethics[edit]

Neither Lacks nor her family gave her physician permission to harvest the cells. At that time, permission was neither required nor customarily sought.[36] The cells were later commercialized. In the 1980s, family medical records were published without family consent. A similar issue was brought up in the Supreme Court of California case of Moore v. Regents of the University of California. On July 9, 1990, the court ruled that a person's discarded tissue and cells are not their property and can be commercialized.[37]

In March 2013, German researchers published the DNA code, or genome, of a strain of HeLa cells without permission from the Lacks family.[38] Later, in August 2013, an agreement by the family and the National Institutes of Health was announced that gave the family some control over access to the cells' DNA code and a promise of acknowledgement in scientific papers. In addition, two family members will join a six-member committee which will regulate access to the code.
In law and ethics edit br br Neither Lacks nor ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 15, 2015 14:57:35   #
moldyoldy
 
The gov. stole their blood samples, and medical history without consent. We will never know the truth.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Leaning Left
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.