Generic porno question
Mar 4, 2015 08:45:21 #
Could someone please explain to me why the presence of a camera makes prostitution legal?
Mar 4, 2015 09:09:02 #
Mar 4, 2015 09:09:35 #
autocthon wrote:
Could someone please explain to me why the presence of a camera makes prostitution legal?
Because none of the Congressmen want to be recorded..........
Mar 4, 2015 09:29:00 #
MrEd wrote:
Because none of the Congressmen want to be recorded..........
Too true, but I was actually thinking of a more generic reason. I never could figure out WHY porn wasn't treated the same as prostitution. I mean, with the exception of a camera and crew, it's all money for sex.
Mar 4, 2015 10:26:08 #
no propaganda please
Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
MrEd wrote:
Because none of the Congressmen want to be recorded..........
you are probably right. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 4, 2015 13:55:00 #
autocthon wrote:
Could someone please explain to me why the presence of a camera makes prostitution legal?
Well, technically the performers are not paying each other for sex, so they aren't involved in prostitution per se. And the viewer isn't having any direct sexual interaction with the film, so that's not technicality purchasing sexual activity either. I'm pretty certain it comes under freedom of expression (like in printed books).
I personally have no problem with the idea of porn itself. But I do have a problem with the system which manipulates and abuses vulnerable people (mostly women). In addition it tends to set up impossible body standards that can make the average person feel inadequate. I mean, from my extensive research you know. :shock:
Mar 4, 2015 14:59:00 #
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
PaulPisces wrote:
Well, technically the performers are not paying ea... (show quote)
it has always been beyond my imagination how anyone could get a kick out of watching two other people have sex, I went to one sex movie in Guam it was so exciting I went to sleep 10 min. into it
Mar 4, 2015 15:01:51 #
PaulPisces wrote:
Well, technically the performers are not paying ea... (show quote)
Yeah, my "personal" experience came from 'Nam. Most people didn't know that the 3rd Mar Div actually "unofficially" sanctioned a skivvy house there.
But, anyway, if I invited someone with with a camera phone and someone to watch and paid through the watcher it would be legal?
And before the smart-ass comments: I'm too old and hopefully too smart to do that again.
Mar 5, 2015 20:58:12 #
autocthon wrote:
Could someone please explain to me why the presence of a camera makes prostitution legal?
did Obama make that law too??
Mar 6, 2015 09:35:59 #
badbobby wrote:
did Obama make that law too??
Naw, I think it conflicts with Sharia law or something.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.