rom the very first moments of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in B******i on September 11, 2012, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides were advised that the compound was under a terrorist attack. In fact, less than two hours into the attack, they were told that the al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility.
These revelations and others are disclosed by a trove of e-mails and other documents pried from the State Department by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The FOIA litigation focuses on Mrs. Clintons involvement in the government actions before, during, and after the B******i attack, in which Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, was murdered by terrorists. Also k**led in the attack were State Department information management officer Sean Smith, and two former Navy SEALs, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who were contract security employees and who had fought heroically, saving numerous American lives. At least ten other Americans were wounded, some quite seriously.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414500/hillary-clintons-top-aides-knew-first-minutes-b******i-was-terrorist-attack-e-mails
We all know, even the clueless libs that Hilary and the administration lied. They just don't care. After all it was just four w***e A******ns not some wanna be thug.
bmac32 wrote:
rom the very first moments of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in B******i on September 11, 2012, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides were advised that the compound was under a terrorist attack. In fact, less than two hours into the attack, they were told that the al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility.
These revelations and others are disclosed by a trove of e-mails and other documents pried from the State Department by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The FOIA litigation focuses on Mrs. Clintons involvement in the government actions before, during, and after the B******i attack, in which Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, was murdered by terrorists. Also k**led in the attack were State Department information management officer Sean Smith, and two former Navy SEALs, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who were contract security employees and who had fought heroically, saving numerous American lives. At least ten other Americans were wounded, some quite seriously.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414500/hillary-clintons-top-aides-knew-first-minutes-b******i-was-terrorist-attack-e-mailsrom the very first moments of the terrorist attack... (
show quote)
Democrats have made a lot of mistakes and the lying will be brought up during the debates and refresh v**ers minds.
JFlorio wrote:
We all know, even the clueless libs that Hilary and the administration lied. They just don't care. After all it was just four w***e A******ns not some wanna be thug.
bmac32 wrote:
Democrats have made a lot of mistakes and the lying will be brought up during the debates and refresh v**ers minds.
You conspiracy theorists do realize that the FOI, is getting already rehashed info, nothing new. These great revelations, are the same old BS. There is nothing there and never will be.
You and your kind can only hope it's conspiracy but your conspiracy seems to be in State Department emails which are official.
moldyoldy wrote:
You conspiracy theorists do realize that the FOI, is getting already rehashed info, nothing new. These great revelations, are the same old BS. There is nothing there and never will be.
moldyoldy wrote:
You conspiracy theorists do realize that the FOI, is getting already rehashed info, nothing new. These great revelations, are the same old BS. There is nothing there and never will be.
It's true that it was obvious all along thar Rice lied and Hilly wasn't nearly as stupid as she pretended to be.
Super Dave wrote:
It's true that it was obvious all along thar Rice lied and Hilly wasn't nearly as stupid as she pretended to be.
Yes, and all those 'lost' e-mails of Lois Lerner have been 'found'. Now it will be 'Katy bar the door' time.
moldyoldy wrote:
You conspiracy theorists do realize that the FOI, is getting already rehashed info, nothing new. These great revelations, are the same old BS. There is nothing there and never will be.
Hillary for president. She will lose. :lol: :lol: :lol:
bmac32 wrote:
rom the very first moments of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in B******i on September 11, 2012, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides were advised that the compound was under a terrorist attack. In fact, less than two hours into the attack, they were told that the al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility.
These revelations and others are disclosed by a trove of e-mails and other documents pried from the State Department by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The FOIA litigation focuses on Mrs. Clintons involvement in the government actions before, during, and after the B******i attack, in which Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, was murdered by terrorists. Also k**led in the attack were State Department information management officer Sean Smith, and two former Navy SEALs, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who were contract security employees and who had fought heroically, saving numerous American lives. At least ten other Americans were wounded, some quite seriously.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414500/hillary-clintons-top-aides-knew-first-minutes-b******i-was-terrorist-attack-e-mailsrom the very first moments of the terrorist attack... (
show quote)
C'mon bmac - the National Review is a William F. Buckley, way right and often wrong propaganda sheet. The screams of outrage from Republican screamies and their badly twisted claims have been repeatedly proved nonsense by Republican, Democratic, and mixed investigations.
Where you been?
Neal wrote:
C'mon bmac - the National Review is a William F. Buckley, way right and often wrong propaganda sheet. The screams of outrage from Republican screamies and their badly twisted claims have been repeatedly proved nonsense by Republican, Democratic, and mixed investigations.
Where you been?
And where have you been 'h*****g out', MSNBC and CNN?
Been napping I see, William F. Buckley died in 2008, nice nap?
Neal wrote:
C'mon bmac - the National Review is a William F. Buckley, way right and often wrong propaganda sheet. The screams of outrage from Republican screamies and their badly twisted claims have been repeatedly proved nonsense by Republican, Democratic, and mixed investigations.
Where you been?
As a former drinker, seek some help and this only a suggestion.
Super Dave wrote:
Drunken binge maybe?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.