One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Georgia To Create State’s First L**T-Only ‘P***e School’ Starting At Pre-K
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 24, 2015 07:31:17   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
This is what I'd like to call "expanding the base".

When the LBGTQ can't get enough of their demented influence to be accepted by the moral majority, they will now indoctrinate the children with only one agenda in mind....THEIRS!

Georgia To Create State’s First L**T-Only ‘P***e School’ Starting At Pre-K thru 8th grade
Geoffrey Grider | February 23, 2015

School organizers hope to initially start P***e School Atlanta this fall with classes from Pre-K to 8th grade.

According to Centers for Disease Control’s National Health Information Survey, people claiming to be L***Q make up less than 5% of America. That’s a really small percentage. Since L***Q people are not able to reproduce naturally, they must either adopt or use a sperm donor to obtain a child. Once having procured the child, indoctrination must then begin if their ranks are ever going to grow. Now they say that they need their own school so training and indoctrination in the L***Q lifestyle will be seamless.

These poor kids will be relentlessly exposed to the q***r lifestyle and bombarded with q***r ideas and “values”. They won’t stand a chance. America in 2015 is a scary place, and getting more bizarre and fragmented with each passing day. Just wait until they add the “P” to the L***Q, and they absolutely will.

Oh....and the "P"....that's for p*******es.
This is just plain SICK!

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=31105

http://www.11alive.com/story/news/education/2015/02/12/gay-community-private-school-atlanta/23322715/

FQA....Future Queers of America
FQA....Future Queers of America...

My Preference for a Teacher
My Preference for a Teacher...

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 07:40:37   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
bdamage wrote:
This is what I'd like to call "expanding the base".

When the LBGTQ can't get enough of their demented influence to be accepted by the moral majority, they will now indoctrinate the children with only one agenda in mind....THEIRS!

Georgia To Create State’s First L**T-Only ‘P***e School’ Starting At Pre-K thru 8th grade
Geoffrey Grider | February 23, 2015

School organizers hope to initially start P***e School Atlanta this fall with classes from Pre-K to 8th grade.

According to Centers for Disease Control’s National Health Information Survey, people claiming to be L***Q make up less than 5% of America. That’s a really small percentage. Since L***Q people are not able to reproduce naturally, they must either adopt or use a sperm donor to obtain a child. Once having procured the child, indoctrination must then begin if their ranks are ever going to grow. Now they say that they need their own school so training and indoctrination in the L***Q lifestyle will be seamless.

These poor kids will be relentlessly exposed to the q***r lifestyle and bombarded with q***r ideas and “values”. They won’t stand a chance. America in 2015 is a scary place, and getting more bizarre and fragmented with each passing day. Just wait until they add the “P” to the L***Q, and they absolutely will.

Oh....and the "P"....that's for p*******es.
This is just plain SICK!

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=31105

http://www.11alive.com/story/news/education/2015/02/12/gay-community-private-school-atlanta/23322715/
This is what I'd like to call "expanding the ... (show quote)









I don't believe you can teach gay, bdamage; you are or you ain't. At about 5 years old, in Parochial school, I knew where my genes wandered. And although I'm still in contact with my first male friend from 1948, the attraction was [and is] purely intellectual.

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 07:43:41   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
robmull wrote:
I don't believe you can teach gay, bdamage; you are or you ain't. At about 5 years old, in Parochial school, I knew where my genes wandered. And although I'm still in contact with my first male friend from 1948, the attraction was [and is] purely intellectual.


Ah....but back then you didn't have people telling you that it is what is expected of you.

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2015 08:28:10   #
She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia
 
As long as the school is private, I have no problem. If you ask for my tax dollars, I have a real problem. Just as my children went to private school to avoid what I saw as academically lacking and very unsafe public schools, these parents have the right to send their children to private schools.

Just do not ask me to fund them. I payed for my choice. Pay for yours.

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 09:00:25   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
She Wolf wrote:
As long as the school is private, I have no problem. If you ask for my tax dollars, I have a real problem. Just as my children went to private school to avoid what I saw as academically lacking and very unsafe public schools, these parents have the right to send their children to private schools.

Just do not ask me to fund them. I payed for my choice. Pay for yours.


Even though this is a prime target for p*******es?
This is OK with you?

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 09:13:44   #
DamnYANKEE
 
America Only wrote:
Damned q***rs should all be shot....and soon. Yesterday would have been great. Last year even better. This is gone on too much....a q***r school? More than just sick.


Along with Every MUZZY on the PLANET

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 10:44:08   #
She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia
 
bdamage wrote:
Even though this is a prime target for p*******es?
This is OK with you?


My personal opinion is this behavior is wrong. I agree it will be a prime target for p*******es. If we try to stop this school, what will be next? All the parents who wish to send their children to religious private schools will be attacked.

I know people of my faith would never send a child to such a school. I also know people who wish to bring their children up to feel this is an acceptable lifestyle will do so with or without a private school.

I do worry for the children sent to this school but I also know I am not in a position to tell other parents how to rear their children. Just as I will rear mine to believe it is wrong, which I am sure angers a few people. I can not ask for the right to parent my child as I see fit and not allow the same right to others.

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2015 11:07:39   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
She Wolf wrote:
My personal opinion is this behavior is wrong. I agree it will be a prime target for p*******es. If we try to stop this school, what will be next? All the parents who wish to send their children to religious private schools will be attacked.

I know people of my faith would never send a child to such a school. I also know people who wish to bring their children up to feel this is an acceptable lifestyle will do so with or without a private school.

I do worry for the children sent to this school but I also know I am not in a position to tell other parents how to rear their children. Just as I will rear mine to believe it is wrong, which I am sure angers a few people. I can not ask for the right to parent my child as I see fit and not allow the same right to others.
My personal opinion is this behavior is wrong. I ... (show quote)


So....you don't have any message to send to the parents of these children?

You will be OK when these start to pop up in our country...that is if they aren't already here.
Get a grip....children are vulnerable and good people should NEVER just stand by and let evil prevail!!!

Report: Hamas Hosts 10,000 Palestinian Teens for Jihad Camp
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/28/report-hamas-hosts-10000-palestinian-teens-for-jihad-camp/







Reply
Feb 24, 2015 14:01:53   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Growing Up with Gay Parents: What's the Big Deal?
Rick Fitzgibbons,

Sound studies show that the children of LGB parents fare less well than those growing up in other family arrangements

A very large body of social science research going back decades has documented the vital and unique role of mothers and of fathers in childhood development. These studies have also demonstrated the negative psychological, educational and social effects on children who have been deprived of growing up in a home with both biological parents who are married to each other.


A very brief summary of findings on the mothers’ unique and crucial role in childhood development would include these points:

1. Infants and toddlers prefer their mothers to their fathers when they seek solace or relief from hunger, fear, sickness or some other distress
2. Mothers tend to be more soothing
3. Mothers are more responsive to the distinctive cries of infants: they are better able than fathers, for example, to distinguish between their baby’s cry of hunger and cry of pain
4. They are also better than fathers at detecting their children’s emotions by looking at their faces, postures and gestures. Not surprisingly, then,
5. Children who were deprived of maternal care during extended periods in their early lives “lacked feeling, had superficial relationships, and exhibited hostile or antisocial tendencies” as they developed into adulthood. (R. Kobak, 1999)

Fathers also bring an array of distinctive talents to the parenting enterprise.

1. Fathers excel when it comes to providing discipline and play and challenging their children to embrace life’s challenges
2. Fathers provide essential role models for boys
3. A father’s presence in the home protects a child from fear and strengthens a child’s ability to feel safe

The extensive research on the serious psychological, academic and social problems in youth raised in fatherless families demonstrates the importance of the presence of the father in the home for healthy childhood development.

Let’s look, then, at some of the larger, well-designed studies that have shown the risks experienced by children who were deprived of growing up in a home with both biological parents who were married to each other.
Read full article:
http://www.aleteia.org/en/lifestyle/article/growing-up-with-gay-parents-whats-the-big-deal-1-5869643663147008

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 11:54:13   #
the waker Loc: 11th freest nation
 
She Wolf wrote:
As long as the school is private, I have no problem. If you ask for my tax dollars, I have a real problem. Just as my children went to private school to avoid what I saw as academically lacking and very unsafe public schools, these parents have the right to send their children to private schools.

Just do not ask me to fund them. I payed for my choice. Pay for yours.


I agree, there needs to be more accountability for the chosen curriculums of public, tax payer funded schools.

:thumbup:

Reply
Feb 26, 2015 02:26:59   #
Ricktloml
 
bdamage wrote:
Growing Up with Gay Parents: What's the Big Deal?
Rick Fitzgibbons,

Sound studies show that the children of LGB parents fare less well than those growing up in other family arrangements

A very large body of social science research going back decades has documented the vital and unique role of mothers and of fathers in childhood development. These studies have also demonstrated the negative psychological, educational and social effects on children who have been deprived of growing up in a home with both biological parents who are married to each other.


A very brief summary of findings on the mothers’ unique and crucial role in childhood development would include these points:

1. Infants and toddlers prefer their mothers to their fathers when they seek solace or relief from hunger, fear, sickness or some other distress
2. Mothers tend to be more soothing
3. Mothers are more responsive to the distinctive cries of infants: they are better able than fathers, for example, to distinguish between their baby’s cry of hunger and cry of pain
4. They are also better than fathers at detecting their children’s emotions by looking at their faces, postures and gestures. Not surprisingly, then,
5. Children who were deprived of maternal care during extended periods in their early lives “lacked feeling, had superficial relationships, and exhibited hostile or antisocial tendencies” as they developed into adulthood. (R. Kobak, 1999)

Fathers also bring an array of distinctive talents to the parenting enterprise.

1. Fathers excel when it comes to providing discipline and play and challenging their children to embrace life’s challenges
2. Fathers provide essential role models for boys
3. A father’s presence in the home protects a child from fear and strengthens a child’s ability to feel safe

The extensive research on the serious psychological, academic and social problems in youth raised in fatherless families demonstrates the importance of the presence of the father in the home for healthy childhood development.

Let’s look, then, at some of the larger, well-designed studies that have shown the risks experienced by children who were deprived of growing up in a home with both biological parents who were married to each other.
Read full article:
http://www.aleteia.org/en/lifestyle/article/growing-up-with-gay-parents-whats-the-big-deal-1-5869643663147008
Growing Up with Gay Parents: What's the Big Deal? ... (show quote)


A new study on homosexual parents tops all precious research

Sociologist Mark Regenrus of the University of Texas at Austin had overturned the conventional wisdom that children suffer no disadvantages when compared to children raised by their mother and father
There are 8 outcome variables where differences between the children of homosexual parents and married parents were not only present, and favorable to married parents, but where these findings were statistically significant for both children of lesbian mothers and gay fathers, both with and without controls. While all findings are important, these are the strongest possible ones-virtually irrefutable compared with children raised by their married parents (IBF), children of homosexual parents (LM) and (GF)

Are much more likely to receive welfare-IBF-17%, LM-69%, GF-57%

Have lower educational attainment

Report less safety and security in their family of origin

Are more likely to suffer depression

Have been arrested more often

If they are female, have had more sexual partners-both male and female

Are more likely to be co-habitating

Are almost 4 times more likely to be currently on public assistance

Are less likely to be currently employed

Are more than 3 times more likely to be unemployed

Nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than heterosexual

Are 3 times more likely to have had an affair while married or co-habitating

Are an astonishing 10 times more likely to have been "TOUCHED SEXUALLY by a PARENT or OTHER ADULT CAREGIVER"

Are 4 times as likely to have been PHYSICALLY FORCED to have SEX AGAINST THEIR WILL

Are more likely to have "attachment" problems related to the ability to depend on others

Use marijuana more frequently

Watch TV for long periods of more frequently

Have more often plead guilty to a non-minor offense

Children should never be allowed around homosexuals

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2015 02:35:14   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Ricktloml wrote:
A new study on homosexual parents tops all precious research

Sociologist Mark Regenrus of the University of Texas at Austin had overturned the conventional wisdom that children suffer no disadvantages when compared to children raised by their mother and father
There are 8 outcome variables where differences between the children of homosexual parents and married parents were not only present, and favorable to married parents, but where these findings were statistically significant for both children of lesbian mothers and gay fathers, both with and without controls. While all findings are important, these are the strongest possible ones-virtually irrefutable compared with children raised by their married parents (IBF), children of homosexual parents (LM) and (GF)

Are much more likely to receive welfare-IBF-17%, LM-69%, GF-57%

Have lower educational attainment

Report less safety and security in their family of origin

Are more likely to suffer depression

Have been arrested more often

If they are female, have had more sexual partners-both male and female

Are more likely to be co-habitating

Are almost 4 times more likely to be currently on public assistance

Are less likely to be currently employed

Are more than 3 times more likely to be unemployed

Nearly 4 times more likely to identify as something other than heterosexual

Are 3 times more likely to have had an affair while married or co-habitating

Are an astonishing 10 times more likely to have been "TOUCHED SEXUALLY by a PARENT or OTHER ADULT CAREGIVER"

Are 4 times as likely to have been PHYSICALLY FORCED to have SEX AGAINST THEIR WILL

Are more likely to have "attachment" problems related to the ability to depend on others

Use marijuana more frequently

Watch TV for long periods of more frequently

Have more often plead guilty to a non-minor offense

Children should never be allowed around homosexuals
A new study on homosexual parents tops all preciou... (show quote)


WOW!
Very eye-opening!

Reply
Feb 26, 2015 02:42:48   #
Haughty Lib Loc: Boston, NYC, D.C.
 
bdamage wrote:
This is what I'd like to call "expanding the base".

When the LBGTQ can't get enough of their demented influence to be accepted by the moral majority, they will now indoctrinate the children with only one agenda in mind....THEIRS!

Georgia To Create State’s First L**T-Only ‘P***e School’ Starting At Pre-K thru 8th grade
Geoffrey Grider | February 23, 2015

School organizers hope to initially start P***e School Atlanta this fall with classes from Pre-K to 8th grade.

According to Centers for Disease Control’s National Health Information Survey, people claiming to be L***Q make up less than 5% of America. That’s a really small percentage. Since L***Q people are not able to reproduce naturally, they must either adopt or use a sperm donor to obtain a child. Once having procured the child, indoctrination must then begin if their ranks are ever going to grow. Now they say that they need their own school so training and indoctrination in the L***Q lifestyle will be seamless.

These poor kids will be relentlessly exposed to the q***r lifestyle and bombarded with q***r ideas and “values”. They won’t stand a chance. America in 2015 is a scary place, and getting more bizarre and fragmented with each passing day. Just wait until they add the “P” to the L***Q, and they absolutely will.

Oh....and the "P"....that's for p*******es.
This is just plain SICK!

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=31105

http://www.11alive.com/story/news/education/2015/02/12/gay-community-private-school-atlanta/23322715/
This is what I'd like to call "expanding the ... (show quote)


Only someone who secretly want to have sex with someone of the same sex believes in gay indoctrination.

Secondly, most p*******es are white straight men.

Reply
Feb 26, 2015 02:51:50   #
Haughty Lib Loc: Boston, NYC, D.C.
 
Ricktloml wrote:
A new study on homosexual parents tops all precious research

Sociologist Mark Regenrus of the University of Texas at Austin .....


Ex-Gay Therapists Join H**e Groups In Praising Flawed Parenting Study

" by Zack Ford Posted on June 22, 2012 at 9:01 am

The National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), the professional organization for ex-gay therapists, sang the praises yesterday of Mark Regenrus’ completely flawed study that claimed to evaluate same-sex parenting. Rather than acknowledge that the paper provided a negligible amount of data about committed same-sex couples with planned families, NARTH suggested it was the most accurate study on same-sex parenting ever:

'In a historic study of children raised by homosexual parents, sociologist Mark Regnerus of the University of Texas at Austin has overturned the conventional academic wisdom that such children suffer no disadvantages when compared to children raised by their married mother and father. Just published in the journal Social Science Research, the most careful, rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted on this issue found numerous and significant differences between these groups–with the outcomes for children of homosexuals rated “suboptimal” (Regnerus’ word) in almost every category.'


If that weren’t enough, NARTH then linked to analyses from the following four sources:

The Family Research Council, an anti-gay h**e group.

Dr. Mark Yarhouse of Regent University, whose own pro-ex-gay research found that ex-gay therapy and behavior does nothing to change sexual orientation.

Townhall columnist Jeff Jacoby, who regularly attacks the L**T community and who has said that same-sex marriage “interferes with the core elements of wedlock.”

The Alliance Defense Fund, an anti-gay h**e group.

There’s never been any doubt about NARTH’s motives, but this clearly shows that ex-gay therapists align with h**e groups to distort science for the sake of demonizing gays. It’s because of the antipathy these groups inject into society that anybody’s same-sex attractions are “unwanted” to begin with, demonstrating the artificial cycle of internalized homophobia they all depend upon. "

Reply
Feb 26, 2015 03:00:00   #
Haughty Lib Loc: Boston, NYC, D.C.
 
The Shamelessness of Professor Mark Regnerus

Quote:
There’s one problem: Regnerus’ research doesn’t show what he says it does. Not remotely. No research ever has. Yet Regnerus, unchastened by a chorus of professional criticism correctly pointing out the obvious flaws in his work—including a formal reprimand in an audit assigned by the journal that published his piece.....

.....
The claim sounds reasonable enough. But since Regnerus never actually studied “children of same-sex parents,” as he claims, his conclusions are equivalent to calling a 747 the fastest plane without ever testing the Concorde. Kids raised in “planned” same-sex households—as opposed to kids from divorced families where one parent later came out—are still statistically rare, and out of his much-ballyhooed sample size of 3,000, Regnerus was unable to find a valid sample of kids who were actually reared by same-sex parents. Instead, all but two—yes, two—came from households originally led by a different-sex couple, usually the kids’ biological parents, that had suffered a family break-up, the one variable that’s most clearly known to raise risks for children. Since the kids in his data set who come from households with what he calls a “gay” or “lesbian” parent nearly all come from broken homes, his conclusions merely restated what everyone already knew: that instability raises risks for kids. But since Regnerus refers to these subjects as “children of same-sex parents,” which he didn’t actually examine, his study is nothing short of dishonest.
Regnerus’ research made waves for another reason. It had the massive weight of a religious conservative money and marketing machine behind it, and it quickly became clear that the study was only incidentally an academic product.

After concerns mounted that the peer-review process might have been rushed, both the publishing journal and independent parties launched investigations. Two hundred social scientists signed a letter citing “serious concerns about the scholarly merit of this paper.” The journal that published the paper commissioned an audit assessing problems with the peer-review process. The audit found “serious flaws and distortions that were not simply ignored, but lauded” in the review process. It found blatant conflicts of interest in that “all three of the respondents to these papers have ties to the Witherspoon Institute,” the conservative religious organization that funded the study with roughly $700,000. Referring to the Regnerus study and a companion piece, the audit concluded that “neither paper should have been published.” In a separate interview with the Chronicle of Higher Education, Darren E. Sherkat, the designated reviewer, dismissed the entire study as “bulls**t.”
Scholarship has to be funded by someone. But disclosures and t***sparency are supposed to let readers know this. Instead, Regnerus was caught lying about the role of conservative funding in his work. In the study, Regnerus writes that “the funding sources played no role at all in the design or conduct of the study, the analyses, the interpretations of the data, or in the pr********n of this manuscript.” Yet in emails obtained using the Freedom of Information Act, Regnerus flatly contradicts this claim, showing Witherspoon was intimately involved with shaping the study. Regnerus wrote that he would like “more feedback” from Witherspoon’s president about the study’s “boundaries,” “optimal timelines,” and “hopes for what emerges from this project,” and he refers to a meeting hosted by the conservative Heritage Foundation, in which key supporters of Regnerus’ study discussed the need to generate research to help oppose gay marriage. According to live blog reports of today’s testimony, one of Regnerus’ emails asked what the study’s supporters “expect” from his research.
There’s one problem: Regnerus’ research doesn’t sh... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.