One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Americans Died, Obama Lied
Feb 18, 2015 19:57:08   #
Mollypitcher1
 
The Obama administration held on to British-sourced intelligence that could have saved the lives of American hostages held by ISIS in Syria, according to a report that all but pins the deaths of James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Kayla Mueller on that decision.

The Daily Beast, a website that’s no enemy of the Obama administration, alleged in a scathing report last week that the White House frustrated British officials by sitting on the intelligence reports, waiting an entire month after receiving them only to stage a (failed) rescue attempt — based, in the end, on the exact same intelligence.

“White House Stalled ISIS Rescue. Foley, Sotloff, and Mueller Died,” the Beast’s headline reads.

Here’s more:

Toward the end of May, the British government had identified two or three locations in and around the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State, where the militants had moved hostages during the previous weeks and months. But the British were not absolutely sure in which location the Westerners were held. The captives included American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, as well aid worker Kayla Mueller. The information — based on debriefings of European captives who had been released, satellite and drone surveillance, and electronic eavesdropping — was not definitive in May.

Then, in early June, London had a “positive identification and that information was shared with Washington,” said a British source. The delay of nearly a month before the rescue bid was mounted remains a source of bewilderment for British officials.

But a U.S. official said that inside the White House, Obama’s senior national-security advisers were not willing to base a raid on intelligence developed by a foreign service. “The issue was that they didn’t trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn’t our own,” said the U.S. official, who asked to remain anonymous when discussing sensitive hostage-rescue efforts.

“They got the information. They just didn’t trust it. And they did sit on it, there’s no doubt about that,” the official said.

After Americans began dying, one by one, in gruesome and public events tailor-made for the media-consumer culture, the victims’ families began to question the Obama administration’s decisions.

“The State Department said they were connecting with the French and everybody at the highest levels,” Foley’s mother, Diane, told the Beast. “Very specific information was available as early as mid-March. And that’s what’s been so tough for us as families, because apparently they were held in the same place all those months.”

Reply
Feb 18, 2015 20:04:11   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
The Obama administration held on to British-sourced intelligence that could have saved the lives of American hostages held by ISIS in Syria, according to a report that all but pins the deaths of James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Kayla Mueller on that decision.

The Daily Beast, a website that’s no enemy of the Obama administration, alleged in a scathing report last week that the White House frustrated British officials by sitting on the intelligence reports, waiting an entire month after receiving them only to stage a (failed) rescue attempt — based, in the end, on the exact same intelligence.

“White House Stalled ISIS Rescue. Foley, Sotloff, and Mueller Died,” the Beast’s headline reads.

Here’s more:

Toward the end of May, the British government had identified two or three locations in and around the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State, where the militants had moved hostages during the previous weeks and months. But the British were not absolutely sure in which location the Westerners were held. The captives included American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, as well aid worker Kayla Mueller. The information — based on debriefings of European captives who had been released, satellite and drone surveillance, and electronic eavesdropping — was not definitive in May.

Then, in early June, London had a “positive identification and that information was shared with Washington,” said a British source. The delay of nearly a month before the rescue bid was mounted remains a source of bewilderment for British officials.

But a U.S. official said that inside the White House, Obama’s senior national-security advisers were not willing to base a raid on intelligence developed by a foreign service. “The issue was that they didn’t trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn’t our own,” said the U.S. official, who asked to remain anonymous when discussing sensitive hostage-rescue efforts.

“They got the information. They just didn’t trust it. And they did sit on it, there’s no doubt about that,” the official said.

After Americans began dying, one by one, in gruesome and public events tailor-made for the media-consumer culture, the victims’ families began to question the Obama administration’s decisions.

“The State Department said they were connecting with the French and everybody at the highest levels,” Foley’s mother, Diane, told the Beast. “Very specific information was available as early as mid-March. And that’s what’s been so tough for us as families, because apparently they were held in the same place all those months.”
The Obama administration held on to British-source... (show quote)


These people are pure evil. Barry and Hillary do not care about American lives. They put in motion the events that got our people k**led in Ben Ghazi too and then did nothing to help them when we could. Barry probably watched it live in the situation room then just went to bed around 8:30. Barry also tells our enemy what our plans are in advance. That is treason and calls for death by firing squad.

Reply
Feb 18, 2015 20:04:23   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
The Obama administration held on to British-sourced intelligence that could have saved the lives of American hostages held by ISIS in Syria, according to a report that all but pins the deaths of James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Kayla Mueller on that decision.

The Daily Beast, a website that’s no enemy of the Obama administration, alleged in a scathing report last week that the White House frustrated British officials by sitting on the intelligence reports, waiting an entire month after receiving them only to stage a (failed) rescue attempt — based, in the end, on the exact same intelligence.

“White House Stalled ISIS Rescue. Foley, Sotloff, and Mueller Died,” the Beast’s headline reads.

Here’s more:

Toward the end of May, the British government had identified two or three locations in and around the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State, where the militants had moved hostages during the previous weeks and months. But the British were not absolutely sure in which location the Westerners were held. The captives included American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, as well aid worker Kayla Mueller. The information — based on debriefings of European captives who had been released, satellite and drone surveillance, and electronic eavesdropping — was not definitive in May.

Then, in early June, London had a “positive identification and that information was shared with Washington,” said a British source. The delay of nearly a month before the rescue bid was mounted remains a source of bewilderment for British officials.

But a U.S. official said that inside the White House, Obama’s senior national-security advisers were not willing to base a raid on intelligence developed by a foreign service. “The issue was that they didn’t trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn’t our own,” said the U.S. official, who asked to remain anonymous when discussing sensitive hostage-rescue efforts.

“They got the information. They just didn’t trust it. And they did sit on it, there’s no doubt about that,” the official said.

After Americans began dying, one by one, in gruesome and public events tailor-made for the media-consumer culture, the victims’ families began to question the Obama administration’s decisions.

“The State Department said they were connecting with the French and everybody at the highest levels,” Foley’s mother, Diane, told the Beast. “Very specific information was available as early as mid-March. And that’s what’s been so tough for us as families, because apparently they were held in the same place all those months.”
The Obama administration held on to British-source... (show quote)


These people are pure evil. Barry and Hillary do not care about American lives. They put in motion the events that got our people k**led in Ben Ghazi too and then did nothing to help them when we could. Barry probably watched it live in the situation room then just went to bed around 8:30. Barry also tells our enemy what our plans are in advance. That is treason and calls for death by firing squad.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2015 20:04:32   #
United States girl
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
The Obama administration held on to British-sourced intelligence that could have saved the lives of American hostages held by ISIS in Syria, according to a report that all but pins the deaths of James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Kayla Mueller on that decision.

The Daily Beast, a website that’s no enemy of the Obama administration, alleged in a scathing report last week that the White House frustrated British officials by sitting on the intelligence reports, waiting an entire month after receiving them only to stage a (failed) rescue attempt — based, in the end, on the exact same intelligence.

“White House Stalled ISIS Rescue. Foley, Sotloff, and Mueller Died,” the Beast’s headline reads.

Here’s more:

Toward the end of May, the British government had identified two or three locations in and around the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State, where the militants had moved hostages during the previous weeks and months. But the British were not absolutely sure in which location the Westerners were held. The captives included American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, as well aid worker Kayla Mueller. The information — based on debriefings of European captives who had been released, satellite and drone surveillance, and electronic eavesdropping — was not definitive in May.

Then, in early June, London had a “positive identification and that information was shared with Washington,” said a British source. The delay of nearly a month before the rescue bid was mounted remains a source of bewilderment for British officials.

But a U.S. official said that inside the White House, Obama’s senior national-security advisers were not willing to base a raid on intelligence developed by a foreign service. “The issue was that they didn’t trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn’t our own,” said the U.S. official, who asked to remain anonymous when discussing sensitive hostage-rescue efforts.

“They got the information. They just didn’t trust it. And they did sit on it, there’s no doubt about that,” the official said.

After Americans began dying, one by one, in gruesome and public events tailor-made for the media-consumer culture, the victims’ families began to question the Obama administration’s decisions.

“The State Department said they were connecting with the French and everybody at the highest levels,” Foley’s mother, Diane, told the Beast. “Very specific information was available as early as mid-March. And that’s what’s been so tough for us as families, because apparently they were held in the same place all those months.”
The Obama administration held on to British-source... (show quote)


He is Arab. all I have to say. Saudia Arabia uses all kinds of confusing names to k**l, steal, destroy the way of life for Jew and Christians. He keeps quiet on the subject.

Reply
Feb 18, 2015 20:05:18   #
United States girl
 
United States girl wrote:
He is Arab. all I have to say. Saudia Arabia uses all kinds of confusing names to k**l, steal, destroy the way of life for Jew and Christians. He keeps quiet on the subject.

Reply
Feb 18, 2015 20:15:08   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
United States girl wrote:
He is Arab. all I have to say. Saudia Arabia uses all kinds of confusing names to k**l, steal, destroy the way of life for Jew and Christians. He keeps quiet on the subject.


:thumbup: Yes he is. He is an instrument of Satan and Satan comes to k**l, steal and destroy.

Reply
Feb 18, 2015 20:44:08   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
The Obama administration held on to British-sourced intelligence that could have saved the lives of American hostages held by ISIS in Syria, according to a report that all but pins the deaths of James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Kayla Mueller on that decision.

The Daily Beast, a website that’s no enemy of the Obama administration, alleged in a scathing report last week that the White House frustrated British officials by sitting on the intelligence reports, waiting an entire month after receiving them only to stage a (failed) rescue attempt — based, in the end, on the exact same intelligence.

“White House Stalled ISIS Rescue. Foley, Sotloff, and Mueller Died,” the Beast’s headline reads.

Here’s more:

Toward the end of May, the British government had identified two or three locations in and around the Syrian city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the so-called Islamic State, where the militants had moved hostages during the previous weeks and months. But the British were not absolutely sure in which location the Westerners were held. The captives included American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, as well aid worker Kayla Mueller. The information — based on debriefings of European captives who had been released, satellite and drone surveillance, and electronic eavesdropping — was not definitive in May.

Then, in early June, London had a “positive identification and that information was shared with Washington,” said a British source. The delay of nearly a month before the rescue bid was mounted remains a source of bewilderment for British officials.

But a U.S. official said that inside the White House, Obama’s senior national-security advisers were not willing to base a raid on intelligence developed by a foreign service. “The issue was that they didn’t trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn’t our own,” said the U.S. official, who asked to remain anonymous when discussing sensitive hostage-rescue efforts.

“They got the information. They just didn’t trust it. And they did sit on it, there’s no doubt about that,” the official said.

After Americans began dying, one by one, in gruesome and public events tailor-made for the media-consumer culture, the victims’ families began to question the Obama administration’s decisions.

“The State Department said they were connecting with the French and everybody at the highest levels,” Foley’s mother, Diane, told the Beast. “Very specific information was available as early as mid-March. And that’s what’s been so tough for us as families, because apparently they were held in the same place all those months.”
The Obama administration held on to British-source... (show quote)


Over on the thread about cops k*****g someone every 8 hours, ROD RIDDLE claims he works for the OPP Admin...PLEASE go find that post and report him.....thanks.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.