oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

According to this Congressman a look around would answer that question quite adequately.

http://conservativevideos.com/2013/06/congressman-rips-on-obama-what-would-tyranny-look-like-in-america-look-around/

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

It's pretty obvious that Obama is a treasonous criminal turning the USA into his own dictatorship.

The question is not what is Obama doing?
The question is what are congress and the judicial branch doing to stop him?

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

that's what my remark was going to be

Lasher Loc: Georgia

According to this guy, we're already in deep doo-doo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ&list=PL3436A5163FF1005C

DockyWocky

"What would tyranny look like in America ?"

Actually, it would look an awful lot like what we have going on right now. George Bush was always ridiculed when he called himself the "deciderer."

Now, we have an executive orderer who has recognized no authority beyond himself to restrain his ordering everything that strikes his "so cool" fancies.

"Ignoring Constitutional restraints," is the first line in the definition of tyranny, and hopefully, in the written Congressional legal indictment of our cadaverous tyrant when our long-overdue judgment day finally arrives.

steyr556

So why is that we know what tyranny looks like and we still sit on our hands waiting for someone to do something?

It is everybody's responsibility to do something what the hell do we think the 2nd amendment was put in place for!

LAwrence

AMEN!

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

It seems like it may be time for you to tell us who those NWO people are and how they are working. You know the word you must type, I am sure.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Part of the reason may well be the IRS, the Department of Injustice, the NSA, the Department of Homeland Security and on and on. Too much of those things started before Obama came along but he was very willing to use those people to do what he has done up to now.

Seriously, I believe that too many people are afraid of the tyrant and his people.

Lasher Loc: Georgia

Oldman, stop baiting me. You post the word, I am already called an anti-JEW.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

You have said the word, over and over, and now can't say it. You may be more cowardly than I originally thought.

Lasher Loc: Georgia

Oldfart, why don't you take a dose of castor oil and go to bed?

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Yep, you are too cowardly to repeat that word now. Maybe you need something to put you to sleep so the rest of us can get some rest.

Adagio

It would look like a Republican trolling Neshoba County Mississippi for r****t v**es in order to keep minorities from v****g.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan began his campaign, not with a speech on supply side economics. He began it with a speech supporting “states rights” just outside Philadelphia, Mississippi at the Neshoba County Fair, the very community where three civil rights workers were murdered in 1964. This was a deliberate appeal to white r****ts that he was on their side and was part of a Republican strategy going back to the 1960’s to build a conservative majority on the basis of r****m.

Situationally, conservatism is defined as the ideology arising out of a distinct but recurring type of historical situation in which a fundamental challenge is directed at established institutions and in which the supporters of those institutions employ the conservative ideology in their defense. Thus, conservatism is that system of ideas employed to justify any established social order, no matter where or when it exists, against any fundamental challenge to its nature or being, no matter from what quarter. Conservatism in this sense is possible in the United States today only if there is a basic challenge to existing American institutions which impels their defenders to articulate conservative values.

The Civil Rights movement was a direct challenge to the existing institutions of the time, and
conservatism as an ideology is thus a reaction to a system under challenge, a defense of the status – quo in a period of intense ideological and social conflict.

The very notion of a race of people that was; at our beginnings as a country, only considered to be 3/5’s of a human being, now having equal footing with those that actually believed in this idea, is a direct challenge to a long held social concept. It denied the idea of w***e s*******y as legitimate. It’s surprising how many people still cling to this idea, and will go to extreme lengths to perpetuate it.

The idea that a person that could have been your s***e at one time, could today be your boss, or even President of the United States, is more than some people can deal with on an emotional level. W***e s*******y as an institution is renounced, discredited, and dismantled, and that is a major blow to an existing order, and conservatism is always a reaction to a challenge to an existing order. These are people that desperately need somebody to look down to in order to validate their own self-worth. “Sure, life is tough. But at least I’m White.” They can no longer rely on a policy that used to be institutionally enforceable. When that is removed by law, hostility is the result; hostility for those that have been emancipated by law and elevated to equal status, and hostility for the law itself including those that proposed it and passed it.

Thus, hatred for African-Americans and for the Liberal’s and liberal policies that endorse their equal status is fully embraced by the conservative.

Lasher Loc: Georgia

Do you mean "Z*****t?"